Difference between revisions of "Ukraine Riots 2013-14"
m (→The reality: tweek) |
(tidy) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
This video is a comprehensive exploration of what has been happening in the Ukraine both leading up to and since the violence in Kiev began in late November 2013. Following the violent ousting of the democratically elected government in Mid-February 2014 (an election certified as 'free and fair' by all international observers), the legal basis on which Russia rests its position and reaction to those events is threefold: | This video is a comprehensive exploration of what has been happening in the Ukraine both leading up to and since the violence in Kiev began in late November 2013. Following the violent ousting of the democratically elected government in Mid-February 2014 (an election certified as 'free and fair' by all international observers), the legal basis on which Russia rests its position and reaction to those events is threefold: | ||
− | #Viktor Yanukovych remains | + | #Viktor Yanukovych remains the ''only'' constitutionally comstituted legal representative of the Ukraininan State |
− | #The Kiev vote which claims to have deposed him was made by a rump of its 450 elected members (the remainder having fled to their Eastern constituencies in fear for their lives), acting outside its standing orders with no quorum and with those members who | + | #The Kiev vote which claims to have deposed him was made by a rump of its 450 elected members (the remainder having fled to their Eastern constituencies in fear for their lives), acting outside its standing orders with no quorum and with those members who ''did'' vote doing so under threat of violence by armed men inside the parliament chamber - in other words under duress. |
− | #Russian forces of up to 27,000 personnel are authorised, by | + | #Russian forces of up to 27,000 personnel are authorised, by treaty with the legal Ukrainian State, to be present in the Crimea and to conduct the operational maneuvers Russia deems necessary to protect the Black Sea Fleet naval base at Sevastopol. |
− | As of 3 March 2014, Russia claims | + | As of 3 March 2014, Russia claims ''not'' to have imported any personnel not authorised under the treaty and, in the absence of a legal authority in Kiev, to have merely undertaken patrolling activities requested of it by the legally elected authorities in Crimea itself. |
Russia also claims that it has been requested in writing by the Ukrainian President Yanukovych to use its military to restore legal authority to Ukraine <ref>[http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/721881 Churkin: Yanukovych requests Russia to use armed forces to restore order in Ukraine] - ITAR-TASS 4 March 2014</ref>. | Russia also claims that it has been requested in writing by the Ukrainian President Yanukovych to use its military to restore legal authority to Ukraine <ref>[http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/721881 Churkin: Yanukovych requests Russia to use armed forces to restore order in Ukraine] - ITAR-TASS 4 March 2014</ref>. | ||
− | As one of the contributors to the | + | As one of the contributors to the video says: an apt analogy for the respective Russian and US actions since the crisis began is that ''" Russia is playing chess while the US is playing poker and American football - bluffing brute force with a pair of sevens"''. President Putin is calling the US bluff and it is to be hoped that the West really IS bluffing because Putin certainly isn't. |
It should also be clear to rational observers that, despite western faux-outrage at their claimed ''"Russian military invasion of a sovereign state"'', were it not for Russia's actions to date [4 March 2014] and the fact that Russia continues to recognise it as a Unitary State, the Ukraine would have fragmented into civil war. Were Russia to withdraw its recognition, there can be little doubt that open civil war would be the result. | It should also be clear to rational observers that, despite western faux-outrage at their claimed ''"Russian military invasion of a sovereign state"'', were it not for Russia's actions to date [4 March 2014] and the fact that Russia continues to recognise it as a Unitary State, the Ukraine would have fragmented into civil war. Were Russia to withdraw its recognition, there can be little doubt that open civil war would be the result. |
Revision as of 15:12, 4 March 2014
Date | 2013 - Present |
---|
Contents
Official Narrative
This is still being written. The western commercially-controlled media is full of 'the wrath of the righteous', pompous demonisation of Russia and little of substance - the usual establishment-loyal tub-thumping propaganda IOW. The leaked telephone call between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt has also complicated the construction of a half-way credible Official Narrative too so, along with the legal status of the new Kiev authorities being - at best - murky, it is simply ignored.
The reality
A comprehensive run-down on events in the Ukraine
This video is a comprehensive exploration of what has been happening in the Ukraine both leading up to and since the violence in Kiev began in late November 2013. Following the violent ousting of the democratically elected government in Mid-February 2014 (an election certified as 'free and fair' by all international observers), the legal basis on which Russia rests its position and reaction to those events is threefold:
- Viktor Yanukovych remains the only constitutionally comstituted legal representative of the Ukraininan State
- The Kiev vote which claims to have deposed him was made by a rump of its 450 elected members (the remainder having fled to their Eastern constituencies in fear for their lives), acting outside its standing orders with no quorum and with those members who did vote doing so under threat of violence by armed men inside the parliament chamber - in other words under duress.
- Russian forces of up to 27,000 personnel are authorised, by treaty with the legal Ukrainian State, to be present in the Crimea and to conduct the operational maneuvers Russia deems necessary to protect the Black Sea Fleet naval base at Sevastopol.
As of 3 March 2014, Russia claims not to have imported any personnel not authorised under the treaty and, in the absence of a legal authority in Kiev, to have merely undertaken patrolling activities requested of it by the legally elected authorities in Crimea itself.
Russia also claims that it has been requested in writing by the Ukrainian President Yanukovych to use its military to restore legal authority to Ukraine [1].
As one of the contributors to the video says: an apt analogy for the respective Russian and US actions since the crisis began is that " Russia is playing chess while the US is playing poker and American football - bluffing brute force with a pair of sevens". President Putin is calling the US bluff and it is to be hoped that the West really IS bluffing because Putin certainly isn't.
It should also be clear to rational observers that, despite western faux-outrage at their claimed "Russian military invasion of a sovereign state", were it not for Russia's actions to date [4 March 2014] and the fact that Russia continues to recognise it as a Unitary State, the Ukraine would have fragmented into civil war. Were Russia to withdraw its recognition, there can be little doubt that open civil war would be the result.
Reports of Sponsorship
In "US and EU Are Paying Ukrainian Rioters & Protesters", a Boiling Frogs Post article from February 2014, Dr Paul Craig Roberts alleged that "A number of confirmations have come in from readers that Washington is fueling the violent protests in Ukraine with [US] taxpayer dollars".[2]
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:After Yugoslavia, Ukraine? | article | 14 February 2014 | Thierry Meyssan | Telling parallels and juxtapositions between the 2013-14 rioting in Ukraine and the dissolution of Yugoslavia |
Document:Costs President Obama is about to pay for Ukraine | article | 1 March 2014 | Andre Fomine | Oriental Review's prognosis for the denouement of US-Western sponsored 'regime-change' efforts in Ukraine |
Document:Is Ukraine drifting toward civil war and Great Power confrontation? | article | 20 February 2014 | Paul Craig Roberts | The solution to a 'problem' requires that the nature of the problem be accurately diagnosed and understood; the mass of the worlds populations - especially in the West are uniformly miss and dis-informed about major issues rendering genuine 'solutions' impossible - it is the SOP of US-Western Power |
Document:Leaked phone call on Ukraine lays bare Washington’s gangsterism | article | 10 February 2014 | Bill Van Auken | A short, readable resume of US foreign affairs diplomatic gangsterism, illustrated by the "Ukraine-Gate" intercepted telephone conversation between US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US ambassador to the Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. |
Document:Russia’s “Save Ukraine” Memorandum: Prevent the Ukraine from “Going Fascist” | article | 13 February 2014 | The geo-politics of the 2013-14 Ukraine riots and the US push for 'Regime-change' from the perspective of a high-level Russian think-tank. | |
Document:Spring fails in Ukrainian plunderland | article | 5 March 2014 | Pepe Escobar | Acerbic commentary and wit on the 2013-14 US sponsored coup in the Ukraine. |
Document:The Anglo-American Axis: Losing Ukraine, Losing Europe | article | 13 December 2013 | Umberto Pascali | A Russian perspective on dealing with the Anglo-American globalisation thrust in general and the unrest in Ukraine in particular |
Document:The Brown Revolution in Ukraine | article | 24 February 2014 | Israel Shamir | Israel Shamir's take on the February 2014 events in Western Ukraine with a pithy, numbered outline of this particular 'Regime-change' modus-operandi - one which is becoming wearily predictable and familiar to students of these things. |
Document:The Massive PSYOP Employed against Ukraine by GCHQ and NSA | article | 28 February 2014 | Wayne Madsen | The rapidly developing internet and electroic communications-based PSYOPS capabilities of US-UK intelligence agencies and their targeted use against the government of the Ukraine |
Document:The Rape of Ukraine: Phase Two Begins | article | 28 February 2014 | William Engdahl | NATO-backed para-military mercenary organisation UNA-UNSO involved in Gladio-style murder of 'protestors' in Ukraine |
Document:The geopolitics of the Ukrainian conflict | article | 20 February 2014 | 'The Saker' | A 'eureka!' article about the geopolitics of the 2013-14 civil conflict in Ukraine. |
Document:Ukraine: One ‘Regime Change’ Too Many? | article | 1 March 2014 | Ray McGovern | A veteran CIA analyst's take on the US-NATO regime change push in the Ukraine |
Document:Ukraine: another piece in US-NATO-EU neo-con puzzle | article | 21 February 2014 | John Robles | The 2014 coup in Ukraine is further confirmation of the US foreign policy goal outlined by then Secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz in a 2001 memo: "...we’ve got about 5 or 10 years to clean up those old Soviet regimes before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us" |
Document:Understanding the crisis in Ukraine | article | 5 March 2014 | Christopher Bollyn | Suppressed facts about the linked neo-nazi and Jewish connections to the 2014 coup in Ukraine |