Difference between revisions of "Crown Prosecution Service"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(elm guest house)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Prosecution_Service
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Prosecution_Service
 
|type=legal
 
|type=legal
 +
|image=Crown Prosecution Service.svg
 
|description=The principal public prosecuting authority, a non-ministerial UK government department that conducts (almost) all criminal prosecutions in England and Wales.
 
|description=The principal public prosecuting authority, a non-ministerial UK government department that conducts (almost) all criminal prosecutions in England and Wales.
 
|start=1986
 
|start=1986
Line 9: Line 10:
 
|headquarters=Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS
 
|headquarters=Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS
 
|num_staff=6840
 
|num_staff=6840
 +
|leader=Attorney General
 +
|powerbase=http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Crown_Prosecution_Service
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
Line 15: Line 18:
 
==Control==
 
==Control==
 
Although the official leader of the CPS is the [[Director of Public Prosecutions]], the [[Attorney General for England and Wales]] "superintends" the CPS's work by having regular meetings and also answers for it in the [[UK Parliament]]. A small number of offences (including any under the [[Official Secrets Act]]) specifically require the Attorney’s permission to prosecute, and the Attorney can also claim "[[national security]]" grounds to influence the conduct of prosecutions.
 
Although the official leader of the CPS is the [[Director of Public Prosecutions]], the [[Attorney General for England and Wales]] "superintends" the CPS's work by having regular meetings and also answers for it in the [[UK Parliament]]. A small number of offences (including any under the [[Official Secrets Act]]) specifically require the Attorney’s permission to prosecute, and the Attorney can also claim "[[national security]]" grounds to influence the conduct of prosecutions.
 +
 +
==Failure to prosecute==
 +
The CPS is notable for its ''failure'' to prosecute people, particularly in connection with the ''[[VIPaedophile]]'' case. [[Keir Starmer]] twice failed to prosecute [[Jimmy Saville]].{{cn}}
  
 
===VIPaedophile===
 
===VIPaedophile===
[[image:CPS-Elm_Guest-house.jpg|right|thumbnail|300px|The CPS reportedly destroyed a file of [[Elm Guest House]] suspects in 2007]]
+
[[image:CPS-Elm_Guest-house.jpg|right|thumbnail|440px|The CPS reportedly destroyed a file of [[Elm Guest House]] suspects in 2007]]
 +
 
 +
The CPS, by its own admission{{whose}} failed on 3 separate occasions to prosecute both [[Cyril Smith]] and  [[Greville Janner]]. They also orighinally declined to prosecute [[Gordon Anglesea]], who was later convicted of [[child sexual abuse]].<ref name=bcfm>http://radio4all.net/responder.php/download/97477/107081/119029/?url=http://www.radio4all.net/files/tony@cultureshop.org.uk/2149-1-20180511190000.mp3</ref>
 +
 
 
[[The Mirror]] reported in 2015 that the claim of "[[national security]]" was used to prevent investigation into [[paedophilia]] amongst senior officials back in the 1980s.<ref>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ex-cop-claims-royal-paedophile-ring-5379159</ref>
 
[[The Mirror]] reported in 2015 that the claim of "[[national security]]" was used to prevent investigation into [[paedophilia]] amongst senior officials back in the 1980s.<ref>http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ex-cop-claims-royal-paedophile-ring-5379159</ref>
  
The CPS reported in response to a 2014 [[FOIA]] request that a file of [[Elm Guest House]] suspects was destroyed on 11 April 2007.<ref>https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/category/elm-guest-house/</ref>
+
The CPS reported in response to a 2014 [[FOIA]] requesnt that a file of [[Elm Guest House]] suspects was destroyed on 11 April 2007.<ref>https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/category/elm-guest-house/</ref>
 +
 
 +
===Operation Lydd===
 +
The CPS announced in June 2016 that it would not bring any charges in [[Operation Lydd]], a police investigation into the UK government’s role in the March 2004 to [[kidnap]] and send to Libya two families (including a pregnant woman and children aged 6 to 12) where they were regularly [[torture]]d over a period of 6 years.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/31/met-libya-abduction-rendition-cps</ref> The CPS sat on a 28,000 page police file for almost two years before they said there was ‘insufficient evidence’ to charge anyone at MI6 over the kidnap and torture of the Belhaj and al-Saadi families.<ref>http://www.scottishlegal.com/2016/08/23/government-secrecy-in-renditions-prosecution-challenged/</ref>
 +
 
 +
The [[head of MI5]] at the time, [[Eliza Manningham-Buller]], wrote to [[Tony Blair]] to protest [[MI6]]’s involvement in [[CIA]] "[[extraordinary rendition]]" and [[torture]], and the ''[[Sunday Times]]'' has reported claims from intelligence sources that [[Jack Straw]] approved the rendition.<ref>http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/23321</ref>
 +
 
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 14:39, 3 September 2020

Group.png Crown Prosecution Service   Powerbase WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Crown Prosecution Service.svg
Formation1986
Parent organizationUK
HeadquartersRose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS
LeaderDirector of Public Prosecutions
TypeLaw.jpg legal
Staff6,840
Owner ofCrown Prosecution Service web site
Founder ofCrown Prosecution Service web site
The principal public prosecuting authority, a non-ministerial UK government department that conducts (almost) all criminal prosecutions in England and Wales.

Official narrative

The main responsibilities of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are to provide legal advice to the police and other investigative agencies during the course of criminal investigations, to decide whether a suspect should face criminal charges following an investigation and to conduct prosecutions both in the magistrates' courts and the Crown Court.

Control

Although the official leader of the CPS is the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Attorney General for England and Wales "superintends" the CPS's work by having regular meetings and also answers for it in the UK Parliament. A small number of offences (including any under the Official Secrets Act) specifically require the Attorney’s permission to prosecute, and the Attorney can also claim "national security" grounds to influence the conduct of prosecutions.

Failure to prosecute

The CPS is notable for its failure to prosecute people, particularly in connection with the VIPaedophile case. Keir Starmer twice failed to prosecute Jimmy Saville.[citation needed]

VIPaedophile

The CPS reportedly destroyed a file of Elm Guest House suspects in 2007

The CPS, by its own admission[Whose?] failed on 3 separate occasions to prosecute both Cyril Smith and Greville Janner. They also orighinally declined to prosecute Gordon Anglesea, who was later convicted of child sexual abuse.[1]

The Mirror reported in 2015 that the claim of "national security" was used to prevent investigation into paedophilia amongst senior officials back in the 1980s.[2]

The CPS reported in response to a 2014 FOIA requesnt that a file of Elm Guest House suspects was destroyed on 11 April 2007.[3]

Operation Lydd

The CPS announced in June 2016 that it would not bring any charges in Operation Lydd, a police investigation into the UK government’s role in the March 2004 to kidnap and send to Libya two families (including a pregnant woman and children aged 6 to 12) where they were regularly tortured over a period of 6 years.[4] The CPS sat on a 28,000 page police file for almost two years before they said there was ‘insufficient evidence’ to charge anyone at MI6 over the kidnap and torture of the Belhaj and al-Saadi families.[5]

The head of MI5 at the time, Eliza Manningham-Buller, wrote to Tony Blair to protest MI6’s involvement in CIA "extraordinary rendition" and torture, and the Sunday Times has reported claims from intelligence sources that Jack Straw approved the rendition.[6]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References