Difference between revisions of "John Young"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (quote from j young added) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|website=http://cryptome.org | |website=http://cryptome.org | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Young_(Cryptome) | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Young_(Cryptome) | ||
− | |interests=Tor | + | |interests=Tor, leaks, National security, CIA |
|spouses=Deborah Natsios | |spouses=Deborah Natsios | ||
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/John_Young | |sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/John_Young | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''John Young''' was born in 1935.<ref>[[Document:Secrets and Lies]]</ref> | '''John Young''' was born in 1935.<ref>[[Document:Secrets and Lies]]</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Well, conspiracy theory was invented by the spies. No one does more more conspiracy theory than spies do. The national security apparatus cooks up conspiracy theories all the time, but they put out this story that is just conspiracy theory, as though it's contemptible. But in fact, they're the ones who cook up the threats that are far more complex and bizarre than anything we ordinary people could ever cook up and they get billions to fight it. So they're almost diabolically conspiratorially. So let me call myself a sceptic and I'm willing to learn, welcome criticism. I don't mind these terms of being a dissident, a conspiracy theorist. Those are all throwaway terms. (interview with RT Jan 2, 2011)<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMRUiB_8tTc saved at [http://archive.is/lOPbw Archive.is]</ref> | ||
+ | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | {{reflist}} | ||
+ | {{stub}} |
Revision as of 18:55, 20 April 2020
John Young | |
---|---|
Born | 1935 |
Spouse | Deborah Natsios |
Founder/Owner of | Cryptome |
Interests | • Tor • leaks • “National security” • CIA |
John Young was born in 1935.[1]
Well, conspiracy theory was invented by the spies. No one does more more conspiracy theory than spies do. The national security apparatus cooks up conspiracy theories all the time, but they put out this story that is just conspiracy theory, as though it's contemptible. But in fact, they're the ones who cook up the threats that are far more complex and bizarre than anything we ordinary people could ever cook up and they get billions to fight it. So they're almost diabolically conspiratorially. So let me call myself a sceptic and I'm willing to learn, welcome criticism. I don't mind these terms of being a dissident, a conspiracy theorist. Those are all throwaway terms. (interview with RT Jan 2, 2011)[2]
Documents by John Young
Title | Document type | Publication date | Subject(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Anonymous Surpasses Wikileaks | article | 17 February 2011 | Wikileaks 'Anonymous' Barrett Brown HBGary | |
Document:NYT and Guardian on Wikileaks | article | 4 February 2011 | Wikileaks The Guardian New York Times | |
Document:Nothing too Threatening to Publish | article | 10 July 2011 | Cryptome | |
Document:Review of "Freedom and the Future of the Internet" | book review | 30 November 2012 | Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet | |
Document:Snowden Civil War | article | 5 December 2013 | Surveillance State Edward Snowden Affair | A pithy and on-the-button forecast from John Young about the how the Edward Snowden affair will likely pan out: if the NSA does not yet have effective control of the Snowden leaks, then they are going to make sure that those that have not been published already (i.e. >99% of Snowden's cache) never see the light of day. This is authoritative stuff from a seasoned professional. |
Document:UK Library Spies | 7 January 2011 | Surveillance State |
Related Quotation
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
Cryptome | “Cryptome raises serious questions that nobody else on the left or in the media want to talk about, including how Omidar has created a business from Snowden's cache; what exactly Snowden may have been doing while he was working for the CIA prior to his time at NSA (and what else he may have been doing at NSA itself); and why Snowden and The Intercept continue to proselytize for Tor, the anonymization tool, despite its massive funding from the U.S. government, the Pentagon and the national security state.” | Tim Shorrock | February 2016 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Secrets and Lies | article | 1 September 2007 | John Cook | |
Document:That's Outrageous | article | 1 March 2005 | Michael Crowley | A Readers Digest contributor is outraged, OUTRAGED I say, that a web site like Cryptome should be 'allowed to exist'. He does not intend humour at all, he is deadly serious - which is precisely what makes the piece so funny. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.