Difference between revisions of "Wall Street Journal"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(change type)
(const)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{publication
 
{{publication
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wall_Street_Journal
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wall_Street_Journal
|constitutes=newspaper
+
|constitutes=newspaper, corporate media
 
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=wall_street_journal_1
 
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=wall_street_journal_1
 
|start=1889-07-08
 
|start=1889-07-08
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|powerbase=http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Wall_Street_Journal
 
|powerbase=http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Wall_Street_Journal
 
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Wall_Street_Journal
 
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Wall_Street_Journal
 +
|description=A US newspaper
 
}}
 
}}
 
The '''Wall Street Journal''' is a US [[newspaper]].
 
The '''Wall Street Journal''' is a US [[newspaper]].
 +
==Reporting==
 +
Reporting on [[John McMurtry]]'s speech about the deeper purposes of [[9-11]], the ''Wall Street Journal'' termed him "Osama McMurtry".<ref>https://bsahely.com/2018/07/13/the-human-vocation-an-autobiography-of-higher-education-by-prof-john-mcmurtry-2008/</ref><ref>[[Document:The_Moral_Decoding_of_9-11]]</ref>
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
{{Stub}}
+
==References==
 +
{{Reflist}}

Latest revision as of 01:29, 6 March 2019

Publication.png Wall Street Journal 
(newspaper,  corporate mediaPowerbase SourcewatchRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
The Wall Street Journal first issue.jpg
Typefile of unspecified type
Founded1889-07-08
Author(s)
A US newspaper

The Wall Street Journal is a US newspaper.

Reporting

Reporting on John McMurtry's speech about the deeper purposes of 9-11, the Wall Street Journal termed him "Osama McMurtry".[1][2]

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Anatoly Kurmanaev“"Every journalist has an audience he caters for and in my case, it’s the financial community. You are a mercenary in a sense. You’re there to provide information to a particular client that they find important and it's not good or bad, it’s just the way it is...A couple of times from my experience you try to use, I wouldn’t call them 'cheap tricks', but yeah, kind of sexy tricks. Just last week we had a story about condom shortages in Venezuela. At the official exchange rate condoms were at like $750 dollars or something and the headline was something like ‘$750 dollar condom in Venezuela’ and everyone clicks it, everyone is like 'Jesus, why do they sell it for like $750?'" (We don't learn until the ninth paragraph of Kurmanaev's article that a pack of condoms actually cost about the same as it did in the US at the time.)”Anatoly Kurmanaev2019
Whitney Webb“Epstein was involved in a lot of things, and not only with underage females. Delving into all the publicly available material on Epstein, investigative journalist Whitney Webb needed two volumes to trace Epstein’s complex and mysterious career. She meticulously reconstructs the elaborate nebula of his connections to the world not just of finance, but also of espionage and crime. Her two volumes were published last year with the title, “One Nation Under Blackmail.”

Given all the chatter the WSJ’s articles have generated, at breakfast this morning I thought it appropriate to raise the question not so much of Epstein’s story itself, but of the way the press responds to the public’s need for information. After reminding Chad of the context, I shared these thoughts with Chad.

“The Journal appears to confirm, though only partially and obliquely, much of what Webb has described. Because of the implications — including the inevitable embarassment for people who have carefully crafted their public image of respectability — the Journal should either release the documents or, as Wikileaks was wont to do, share them with a number of serious newspapers to ensure a minimum level of objectivity and transparency. This story and all its implications are of vital interest to the public in a democracy. What, apart from the commercial interest of owning a scoop, explains the Wall Street Journal’s reluctance to do so?””
Whitney Webb
Peter Isackson
May 2023

 

Employees on Wikispooks

EmployeeJobAppointedEndDescription
Paul GigotColumnist and editor1980
Frederick KempeJournalist and editor19812007From 2007 President and CEO of Atlantic Council
Anatoly KurmanaevVenezuela ReporterOctober 2015February 2019"Every journalist has an audience he caters for and in my case, it’s the financial community. You are a mercenary in a sense."
William Lewis (journalist)CEO of Dow Jones and Company9 May 20148 April 2020Publisher of Wall Street Journal
Peggy NoonanJournalist2000Attended Bilderberg/2012, Bilderberg/2016, Bilderberg/2017, Bilderberg/2018
Jerry SeibWashington bureau chief19782016Attended spooky 1981 Colloquium on Clandestine Collection.

 

Documents sourced from Wall Street Journal

TitleTypeSubject(s)Publication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Hillary Clinton Did ItArticleHillary Clinton
Russiagate
John Durham
Fusion GPS
US/2016 Presidential Election
Steele dossier
Robby Mook
Michael Sussmann
CrowdStrike
20 May 2022WSJ Editorial BoardAppearing as a witness in John Durham’s trial of Michael Sussmann, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager, Robby Mook, says she personally approved a plan to give a false 'Trump, Russia' claim to the news media.
Document:No Need to Panic About Global Warmingarticle"Climate change"28 January 2012Editorial staff
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References