Difference between revisions of "Deep state/Supranational nature"
(better lede) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|description=The ''supranational'' deep state is a recognition that the deep state knows no borders, that flags assigned to different political entities are no more meaningful than those political structures are autonomous. In the 21st century, it is a mistake to see deep state groups as fundamentally separate. While still subject to internecine fueds and rivalry, deep state factions work so closely together and have such a common interests that it is a mistake to seem them as truly separate. | |description=The ''supranational'' deep state is a recognition that the deep state knows no borders, that flags assigned to different political entities are no more meaningful than those political structures are autonomous. In the 21st century, it is a mistake to see deep state groups as fundamentally separate. While still subject to internecine fueds and rivalry, deep state factions work so closely together and have such a common interests that it is a mistake to seem them as truly separate. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | <!-- One off loose markup -->[[Has subGroup::Safari Club| ]][[Has subGroup::Booz Allen Hamilton| ]] | + | <!-- One off loose markup -->[[Has subGroup::Safari Club| ]][[Has subGroup::Booz Allen Hamilton| ]]<!-- |
| − | + | for intelligence agencies which are more supranational than anything else | |
| − | The name "deep state" suggests an immediate parallel with [[nation state]], which is not altogether misleading, at least historically, since it is hard for more than one such group to effectively control the key organs of a national government. However, a clear correspondence cannot exist since deep state groups, although originating in particular localities, are interlocking in nature and are looser structures lacking formal definition. | + | --> |
| + | The name "'''[[deep state]]'''" suggests an immediate parallel with [[nation state]], which is not altogether misleading, at least historically, since it is hard for more than one such group to effectively control the key organs of a national government. However, a clear correspondence cannot exist since deep state groups, although originating in particular localities, are interlocking in nature and are looser structures lacking formal definition. The '''''supra''national''' angle is a reflection that the global deep state collaboration eclipses individual national governments and employs a range of methods to manipulate them. | ||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 8 October 2016
 Deep state/Supranational nature  | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Start | 1976 |
| The supranational deep state is a recognition that the deep state knows no borders, that flags assigned to different political entities are no more meaningful than those political structures are autonomous. In the 21st century, it is a mistake to see deep state groups as fundamentally separate. While still subject to internecine fueds and rivalry, deep state factions work so closely together and have such a common interests that it is a mistake to seem them as truly separate. | |
The name "deep state" suggests an immediate parallel with nation state, which is not altogether misleading, at least historically, since it is hard for more than one such group to effectively control the key organs of a national government. However, a clear correspondence cannot exist since deep state groups, although originating in particular localities, are interlocking in nature and are looser structures lacking formal definition. The supranational angle is a reflection that the global deep state collaboration eclipses individual national governments and employs a range of methods to manipulate them.
Origins
Peter Dale Scott suggests that a key turning point in the development of the international deep state was the success of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Although partially compromised, their scrutiny of the CIA following the high profile assassinations carried out in the 1960s (e.g. of JFK, RFK, MLK, Malcolm X) was effective enough to introduce monitoring that imperilled the CIA's ability to carry out unsupervised black operations. In response, operations were offshored to foreign intelligence agencies, most notably through the Safari Club:
“The complex milieu of Khashoggi, the BCCI, and the Safari Club can be characterized as a supranational deep state, whose organic links to the CIA may have helped consolidate it. It is clear however that decisions taken at this level by the Safari Club and BCCI were in no way guided by the political determinations of those elected to power in Washington.”
Peter Dale Scott (2014) [1]
Emphasis added
Cover-up
The commercially-controlled media, more or less an agent of deep state forces, remains dedicated to the obscuring the key facts that
- Most if not all of the so-called "democracies" are in fact no such thing, the public politicians are in fact puppets of deep politicians
- These deep politicians have relationships, rivalries and alliances which pay no heed to political borders.
The business of 21st century deep politics knows no political boundaries.
Exposure
In an unguarded moment, Prince Turki bin Faisal al-Saud remarked: “In 1976, after the Watergate matters took place here, your intelligence community was literally tied up by Congress. It could not do anything. It could not send spies, it could not write reports, and it could not pay money. In order to compensate for that, a group of countries got together in the hope of fighting Communism and established what was called the Safari Club. The Safari Club included France, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Iran.”
Supranational nature
Just as "globalisation" has created multi-national corporations which operate with a significant degree of independence from individual nation states, so too for deep state groups. Peter Dale Scott refers in a recent essay to "A Supranational Deep State", noting how their international integration effectively allows deep states to evade even the limited control national governments had in the early 20th century.[2] This is a de facto reversal the public power relationship, a process being codified into international law by the wealth of new supranational treaties being brought in under the banner of free trade.
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld | paper | 10 March 2014 | Peter Dale Scott | An recommended and highly referenced overview of the deep state in action centering on the complex milieu of Khashoggi, the BCCI, and the Safari Club. |
References
- ↑ Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld
- ↑ Document:The State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld
