Difference between revisions of "Document:Why Barnard Castle"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|image_caption=Why [[Barnard Castle]]? Ask [[Dominic Cummings|Cummings]] & [[GSK]]
 
|image_caption=Why [[Barnard Castle]]? Ask [[Dominic Cummings|Cummings]] & [[GSK]]
 
|subjects=GlaxoSmithKline, Dominic Cummings, Barnard Castle
 
|subjects=GlaxoSmithKline, Dominic Cummings, Barnard Castle
|description=On 12 April 2020 [[Dominic Cummings]] was seen in Castle Barnard during [[COVID-19/Lockdown|lockdown]]. Two days later, [[GSK]] of [[Barnard Castle]] signed an agreement to develop and manufacture a vaccine with [[Sanofi]] of [[France]].
+
|description=On 12 April 2020 [[Dominic Cummings]] was seen in [[Castle Barnard]] during [[COVID-19/Lockdown|lockdown]]. Two days later, [[GSK]] of [[Barnard Castle]] signed an agreement to develop and manufacture a vaccine with [[Sanofi]] of [[France]].
 
}}
 
}}
 
In 2012 [[GlaxoSmithKline]] were fined $3 billion for fraud, overcharging and making false claims about medicines in the [[USA]].<ref>''[https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/business/glaxosmithkline-agrees-to-pay-3-billion-in-fraud-settlement.html "Glaxo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion in Fraud Settlement"]''</ref> In 2016, [[GlaxoSmithKline]] were fined £37.6 million in the [[UK]] for bribing companies not to produce generic copies of their out of patent drugs, thus overcharging the [[NHS]].<ref>''[https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/12/glaxosmithkline-fined-anti-competitive-behaviour-seroxat "Glaxo fined £37.6m for 'illegal behaviour' over Seroxat deals"]''</ref>
 
In 2012 [[GlaxoSmithKline]] were fined $3 billion for fraud, overcharging and making false claims about medicines in the [[USA]].<ref>''[https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/business/glaxosmithkline-agrees-to-pay-3-billion-in-fraud-settlement.html "Glaxo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion in Fraud Settlement"]''</ref> In 2016, [[GlaxoSmithKline]] were fined £37.6 million in the [[UK]] for bribing companies not to produce generic copies of their out of patent drugs, thus overcharging the [[NHS]].<ref>''[https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/12/glaxosmithkline-fined-anti-competitive-behaviour-seroxat "Glaxo fined £37.6m for 'illegal behaviour' over Seroxat deals"]''</ref>

Revision as of 14:34, 25 May 2020

On 12 April 2020 Dominic Cummings was seen in Castle Barnard during lockdown. Two days later, GSK of Barnard Castle signed an agreement to develop and manufacture a vaccine with Sanofi of France.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png blog post  by Craig Murray dated 24 May 2020
Subjects: GlaxoSmithKline, Dominic Cummings, Barnard Castle
Source: Craig Murray's blog (Link)

★ Start a Discussion about this document
Why Barnard Castle



In 2012 GlaxoSmithKline were fined $3 billion for fraud, overcharging and making false claims about medicines in the USA.[1] In 2016, GlaxoSmithKline were fined £37.6 million in the UK for bribing companies not to produce generic copies of their out of patent drugs, thus overcharging the NHS.[2]

Despite the fines, these frauds were still massively profitable for GlaxoSmithKline.[3] A perfunctory search on the company brings up similar frauds and fines it perpetrated in South Africa and India. All this within the last decade. I cannot find any information that anyone was jailed, or even sacked, for these criminal activities. It is absolutely astonishing that such an habitually criminal enterprise carries on serenely in the UK. And what is particularly interesting today is that it carries on its crooked activity from its massive manufacturing and research base in Barnard Castle, County Durham.

On 12 April 2020 Dominic Cummings was seen in Castle Barnard during lockdown.[4] Two days later, GlaxoSmithKline of Barnard Castle signed an agreement to develop and manufacture a vaccine with Sanofi of France.[5]

Of course, that could be coincidence. As a child I lived in nearby Peterlee and I know families may go to Barnard Castle just for relaxation. Even when that is illegal. But GlaxoSmithKline Barnard Castle has been working 24/7 during the coronavirus crisis including the weekends.[6] It was working.

The government’s extraordinary refusal to confirm or deny Cummings visit to Barnard Castle appears to make little sense if he just went there for a walk.

But surely if he was discussing vaccine business on behalf of the government, that would answer all the critics of his trip, would it not? They would want to trumpet it from the hills? I mean to believe otherwise, you would have to propound a crazed conspiracy theory. You would have to believe that criminal activity may be occurring again involving GlaxoSmithKline of the kind which might lead to fines of 37.6 million pounds for overcharging the NHS, or of three billion dollars for fraudulent medical claims in the USA. Nobody sane believes that kind of thing, do they?

UPDATED: I should never be surprised by the puerile nature of debate on the Internet, but I frequently am. There appears to be organised pushback stating that this article is only speculation. Of course it is. It states a number of facts not generally known, and wonders if there is a connection. It does not claim to have proof Cummings visited GSK, let alone of what he did when there. But both GSK and Cummings are known bad actors.

The even sillier argument is that Barnard Castle is the research and manufacturing centre and not the corporate HQ and therefore no deal could have been done there. Because when a company is involved in a massive criminal conspiracy, as GSK undeniably was in the multi-billion fraud in the USA or its price-fixing to the NHS, such criminal actions obviously can only be arranged in the main London company boardroom during normal working hours with lots of people around and the maximum chance of inconvenient people finding out what is happening? That is a stupid argument.

Equally, those who claim I have uncovered a criminal conspiracy are wrong. I have not. All I have done is put together some circumstances around Cummings denied trip to Barnard Castle, that could potentially provide a more reasonable explanation for why he would take the risk of going there, and why the government would stake all politically on denying it, than a day trip for a walk for his wife’s birthday. I have not proven anything.

Support this website

Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.[7]

References