Difference between revisions of "Drone"
(weaponised drones legal in North Dakota) |
(fix ref) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Non-combat use== | ==Non-combat use== | ||
− | In 2015, North Dakota became the first use state to allow Police use of drones armed with less than lethal weapons such as [[taser]]s, [[rubber bullet]]s and [[tear gas]] after a last-minute push by a lobbyist.<ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/26/first-state-legalizes-armed-drones-for-cops-thanks-to-a-lobbyist.html<ref> | + | In 2015, North Dakota became the first use state to allow Police use of drones armed with less than lethal weapons such as [[taser]]s, [[rubber bullet]]s and [[tear gas]] after a last-minute push by a lobbyist.<ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/26/first-state-legalizes-armed-drones-for-cops-thanks-to-a-lobbyist.html</ref> |
==Surveillance drones== | ==Surveillance drones== |
Revision as of 14:38, 27 August 2015
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Type | technology |
Interest of | • Josh Begley • Peter Burt |
Contents
Combat use
Drone technology was developed for use by militaries in combat, then rolled out for use on civilians.
Non-combat use
In 2015, North Dakota became the first use state to allow Police use of drones armed with less than lethal weapons such as tasers, rubber bullets and tear gas after a last-minute push by a lobbyist.[1]
Surveillance drones
The BBC announced in 2015 that UK Police would start routine use of drones for mass surveillance, as part of the "war on terror". They also reported that the UK Police would take over responsibility for drone monitoring from the Civil Aviation Authority, effectively preventing oversight of drone use by UK police.[2]
Monitoring workers
In 2015, drones were used to capture video footage that shows construction progress at the Sacramento Kings’ new stadium in California. Drones capture video which is fed into a computer to create a 3d model of the progress of the construction.[3]
An example
Page name | Description |
---|---|
Heterogeneous Aerial Reconnaissance Team |
A Drone victim on Wikispooks
Title | Description |
---|---|
'Jihadi John' | A British Arab man alleged to be the person seen in several atrocity videos obtained and published by SITE Intelligence Group - hard to tell fact from spin in the story, he is possibly a Wag the Dog person. |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Activism on trial: The Elbit Eight and Palestine solidarity | Article | 16 November 2023 | Fatimah Yasmin Ahmed | Eight activists are on trial this week at London’s Snaresbrook Crown Court for disrupting a lethal link in Israel’s military supply chain within the UK. Over the next six weeks, the Elbit Eight will fight in court to prove that Elbit Systems is guilty, and they are not. |
Document:Exclusive: I Can Reveal the Legal Advice on Drone Strikes, and How the Establishment Works | article | 9 September 2015 | Craig Murray | Craig Murray reveals how Sir Daniel Bethlehem continues to bring a Zionist perspective to any legal advice emanating from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office |
Document:Off the Leash: How the UK is developing the technology to build armed autonomous drones | Article | 10 November 2018 | Peter Burt | The United Kingdom should make an unequivocal statement that it is unacceptable for machines to control, determine, or decide upon the application of force in armed conflict and give a binding political commitment that the UK would never use fully autonomous weapon systems |
Document:Spot-Shoot | article | 13 July 2010 | Jonathan Cook | On the use of drones against Palestinians |
Document:The slandering of a Russian “Elon Musk” | article | 19 October 2020 | 'Rhys James' | A tongue-in-cheek analysis of strange goings-on in the Russian Drone design and manufacturing industry; but with a hard edge to it which plausibly suggests Isaeli-Mossad shenanigans |
File:Living under drones.pdf | paper | September 2012 | International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic |