Difference between revisions of "Petrodollar"
(+recycling agreement +ref) |
(+more real story and less WP) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar | |wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar | ||
|type=commercial | |type=commercial | ||
− | |description= | + | |description=Denomination of the majority of the worlds oil in U.S. dollars has been the backbone of U.S. dollar hegemony since the U.S. unilateraly terminated the rights of foreign central banks to convert dollars to gold in 1971. |
− | |start= | + | |start=1974 |
}} | }} | ||
− | '''Petrodollar''' | + | '''Petrodollar''' may be simply defined as oil revenues denominated in U.S. dollars. <ref>Oweiss, Ibrahim M. (1974) Petrodollars: Problems and Prospects, Address before the Conference on The World Monetary Crisis |
+ | Arden House, Harriman Campus, Columbia University http://faculty.georgetown.edu/imo3/petrod/define.htm</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consequently to buy oil, dollars are needed. On a large scale exchanging local currency for dollars is too costly. The prefered way for countries to get dollars is therefore to export goods and sevices for dollars - or to get a loan from banks who hold enough dollar denominated assets, ie. the IMF or other big western banks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the other hand the term "revenues" includes surpluses on such a scale that the oil producing countries could buy up a large proportion of Western assets. The term '''Petrodollar''' refers also to the management of these revenues. Walter Levy, speaker at the [[Bilderberg Conference]] 1973 made clear that "Serious problems would be caused by unprecedented foreign exchange accumulations of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi." <ref name=CoW>Engdahl, F.W. (2004) A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. London: Pluto ISBN 0-7453-2309-X, p.143</ref>These OPEC countries were advised on how to invest their surpluses by Western investment bankers and subsequently signed contracts with the U.S. on military bases, large arms deals, military training and cooperation on governmental and economic levels. Their dependency on U.S. specialists remains unchanged to the present day.<ref>Christopher M. Blanchard (2014) Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service 7-5700 http://www.crs.gov RL33533</ref> | ||
==Origin== | ==Origin== |
Revision as of 15:45, 1 November 2014
Petrodollar | |
---|---|
Type | commercial |
Start | 1974 |
Interest of | US/Federal Reserve |
Subpage(s) | •Petrodollar/Recycling |
Denomination of the majority of the worlds oil in U.S. dollars has been the backbone of U.S. dollar hegemony since the U.S. unilateraly terminated the rights of foreign central banks to convert dollars to gold in 1971. |
Petrodollar may be simply defined as oil revenues denominated in U.S. dollars. [1]
Consequently to buy oil, dollars are needed. On a large scale exchanging local currency for dollars is too costly. The prefered way for countries to get dollars is therefore to export goods and sevices for dollars - or to get a loan from banks who hold enough dollar denominated assets, ie. the IMF or other big western banks.
On the other hand the term "revenues" includes surpluses on such a scale that the oil producing countries could buy up a large proportion of Western assets. The term Petrodollar refers also to the management of these revenues. Walter Levy, speaker at the Bilderberg Conference 1973 made clear that "Serious problems would be caused by unprecedented foreign exchange accumulations of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi." [2]These OPEC countries were advised on how to invest their surpluses by Western investment bankers and subsequently signed contracts with the U.S. on military bases, large arms deals, military training and cooperation on governmental and economic levels. Their dependency on U.S. specialists remains unchanged to the present day.[3]
Contents
Origin
In 1971 Richard Nixon was forced to close the gold window taking the U.S. off the gold standard and setting into motion a devaluation of the U.S. dollar.[4] In an effort to prop up the value of the dollar Nixon negotiated a deal with Saudi Arabia that in exchange for arms and protection they would denominate all future oil sales in U.S. dollars. Subsequently, the other OPEC countries agreed to similar deals thus ensuring a global demand for U.S. dollars and allowing the U.S. to export some of its inflation.[5] Since these dollars did not circulate within the country they were not part of the normal money supply, economists felt another term was necessary to describe the dollars received by petroleum exporting countries (OPEC) in exchange for oil, so the term petrodollar was coined by Georgetown University economics professor, Ibrahim Oweiss.
Because the United States was the largest producer and consumer of oil in the world, the world oil market had been priced in United States dollars since the end of World War II. [6] International oil prices were based on discounts or premiums relative to that for oil in the Gulf of Mexico.[7] But, although oil sales prior to 1973 were denominated in U.S. dollars nothing precluded settlement in local currency.
In October 1973, OPEC declared an oil embargo in response to the United States' and Western Europe's support of Israel in the Yom Kippur War and this tension (and new power of OPEC) led to fear that the dollar would become insignificant in the oil trade.
Financial impact
Petrodollars and petrodollar surpluses are by definition denominated in U.S. dollars, so purchasing power is dependent on the U.S. rate of inflation and the rate at which the U.S. dollar is exchanged (whenever there is need for convertibility) by other currencies in international money markets. It follows that whenever economic or other factors affect the U.S. dollar, petrodollars will be affected to the same magnitude. The link, therefore, between the U.S. dollar and petrodollar surpluses, in particular, has significant economic, political, and other implications.
The placement of petrodollar surpluses of oil exporting nations in the United States may be regarded politically as "hostage capital". In the event of a major political conflict between the United States and an oil-exporting nation, the former with all its military power can confiscate or freeze these assets or otherwise limit their use. It can impose special regulations or at least use regulations for a time, in order to attain certain political, economic, or other goals. It may be argued that such actions are un-American, since they are a direct violation of the sacred principles of capitalism and economic freedom. Nevertheless, the U.S. government resorted to such weapons twice in the 1980s against Iranian and Libyan assets. It follows, therefore, that governments placing their petrodollar surpluses in the United States may lose part of their economic and political independence. Consequently, the more petrodollar surpluses are placed in the United States by a certain oil-exporting nation, the less independent such a nation becomes. [8]
Large inflows of petrodollars into a country often has an impact on the value of its currency. For Canada it was shown that an increase of 10% in the price of oil increases the Canadian dollar value versus the US dollar by 3%[9] and vice versa.
Opposition
News outlets in mid-2000-2002 carried articles about Saddam's efforts to sell oil on markets exclusively in Euros.[10][11] This may have been viewed as a push by Iraq to influence other OPEC states to challenge the reserve currency status in oil trading of the USD. This may have been an unacceptable outcome in the global economy with respect to the flow of petrodollars. through the region.
Since the beginning of 2003, Iran has required euro in payment of exports toward Asia and Europe. The government opened an Iranian Oil Bourse on the free trade zone on the island of Kish,[12][13] for the express purpose of trading oil priced in other currencies, including euros.
Libya decided to challenge the petrodollar system and stop selling all their oil for dollars, shortly before it was attacked. Qaddafi initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Qaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency. … The initiative was viewed negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French president Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi continued his push for the creation of a united Africa. Gaddafi’s proposal to introduce a gold dinar for Africa revived the notion of an Islamic gold dinar floated in 2003 by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, as well as by some Islamist movements. The notion, which contravenes IMF rules and is designed to bypass them, has had trouble getting started.
But today the countries stocking more and more gold rather than dollars include not just Libya and Iran, but also China, Russia, India and Brazil. [14] [15] In May 2014, China agreed to buy $400 billion of Russian-produced natural gas over 30-years, valued in domestic currencies, in what was touted as Gazprom’s biggest contract ever. In August, Russia signed a historic deal with Iran to purchase $20 billion of oil in rubles, bypassing Western sanctions against Iran while hastening the petrodollar’s decline. Aug 14 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday Russia should aim to sell its oil and gas for Roubles globally because the dollar monopoly in energy trade was damaging Russia's economy. [16]
Recycling
- Full article: Petrodollar/recycling
- Full article: Petrodollar/recycling
Petrodollar recycling is the handling of the oil producing countries' surpluses. These surpluses are commonly turned into either U.S. government securities (allowing the printing of more U.S. dollars[17] which are in turn used to buy oil and other goods and services) or are spent in arms deals including payments for U.S. military bases in the Middle East.
The framework for this recycling scheme was layed down by an agreement between the U.S. Treasury and the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA), whose mission was "to establish a new relationship through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with the [U.S.] Treasury borrowing operation. Under this arrangement, SAMA will purchase new US Treasury securities with maturities of at least one year".[18]
It is noteworthy that under this agreement a higher oil price leads to a rising demand for U.S. dollars on a global scale without negatively affecting key parts of the U.S. economy.
Alternative meanings
In addition to the United States petrodollar, a petrodollar can also refer to the Canadian dollar in transactions that involve the sale of Canadian oil to other nations. In this sense, the term petrodollar is related to but should not be confused with petrocurrency which refers to the actual national currency of each petroleum exporting country.
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:What are the Real Targets of the E.U. Oil Embargo against Iran? | article | 31 January 2012 | Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya | |
Document:Will Iran Kill the Petrodollar? | article | 25 January 2012 | Marin Katusa | The possibility of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons is largely a smoke-screen used by the Western powers to obfuscate the real reasons for their escalating confrontation with Iran. |
File:Of Money Part 1.pdf | essay | 2008 | Guido Preparata | Part 1 outlines the history of global monetary/financial systems since the end of WWI and their progressive domination by the United States Federal Reserve system. The essay explains any move by non-WTO countries to conduct trade in currencies other than Dollars, or construct non-Dollar trading blocks, have been so ruthlessly dealt with by the US and its NATO Allies. |
Document:The Libyan War, American Power and the Decline of the Petrodollar System | paper | 17 April 2011 | Peter Dale Scott | A collection of insights that provide a more realistic explanation of the deep political background to the attacks on Libya. |
References
- ↑ Oweiss, Ibrahim M. (1974) Petrodollars: Problems and Prospects, Address before the Conference on The World Monetary Crisis Arden House, Harriman Campus, Columbia University http://faculty.georgetown.edu/imo3/petrod/define.htm
- ↑ Engdahl, F.W. (2004) A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. London: Pluto ISBN 0-7453-2309-X, p.143
- ↑ Christopher M. Blanchard (2014) Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service 7-5700 http://www.crs.gov RL33533
- ↑ Nixon and the End of the Bretton Woods System, 1971–1973
- ↑ "Oil, Petrodollars and Gold".Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ Historical Oil Shocks - Hamilton, James D. Department of Economics. University of California, San Diego. Revised: February 1, 2011
- ↑ Adelman, M. A. (1972). The World Petroleum Market, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, Chapter5.
- ↑ Definition of Petrodollars
- ↑ Correlation between the oil prices and the Canadian dollar
- ↑ Foreign Exchange: Saddam Turns His Back on Greenbacks
- ↑ Radio Free Europe - Iraq: Baghdad Moves To Euro
- ↑ Kish Oil Exchange Planned, Iran Daily, January 24, 2006
- ↑ A frenzied Persian new year, March 22, 2006, Asia Times
- ↑ The Libyan War, American Power and the_Decline of the_Petrodollar System
- ↑ The Wars That Really Are About The Oil - spectator 30 August 2014
- ↑ Putin: 'The petrodollar must die' - WND 15 August 2014
- ↑ http://www.robinupton.com/people/WizardsOfMoney/ WIZARDS OF MONEY - 1. How Money is Created
- ↑ Letter of Jack F. Bennett (assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury) to Henry Kissinger, February 1975. ‘Subject: Special Arrangements for Purchase of U.S. Government Securities by the Saudi Arabian Government.’ International Currency Review. Vol. 20, no. 6, January 1991.
Further reading
- Spiro, David E. (1999). The hidden hand of American hegemony : petrodollar recycling and international markets. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
- "Petrodollar profusion", "The Economist", Apr 26th 2012
Page credit
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here