Difference between revisions of "Human rights"
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{concept | {{concept | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights | ||
+ | |name=IHRL | ||
+ | |constitutes=law | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''International human rights law''' ('''IHRL''') is the body of [[international law]] designed to promote human rights on social, regional, and domestic levels. As a form of [[international law]], [[international human rights law]] is primarily made up of treaties, agreements between sovereign states intended to have binding legal effect between the parties that have agreed to them; and customary international law. Other international human rights instruments, while not legally binding, contribute to the implementation, understanding and development of [[IHRL]] and have been recognised as a source of political obligation.<ref>''[https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0 "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)"]''</ref> | '''International human rights law''' ('''IHRL''') is the body of [[international law]] designed to promote human rights on social, regional, and domestic levels. As a form of [[international law]], [[international human rights law]] is primarily made up of treaties, agreements between sovereign states intended to have binding legal effect between the parties that have agreed to them; and customary international law. Other international human rights instruments, while not legally binding, contribute to the implementation, understanding and development of [[IHRL]] and have been recognised as a source of political obligation.<ref>''[https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-additional-geneva-conventions-12-august-1949-and-0 "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)"]''</ref> |
Latest revision as of 12:01, 21 November 2024
International human rights law (IHRL) is the body of international law designed to promote human rights on social, regional, and domestic levels. As a form of international law, international human rights law is primarily made up of treaties, agreements between sovereign states intended to have binding legal effect between the parties that have agreed to them; and customary international law. Other international human rights instruments, while not legally binding, contribute to the implementation, understanding and development of IHRL and have been recognised as a source of political obligation.[1]
“Ironically, in light of its long-stated commitment to upholding human rights at home and in its foreign policy, the US government today poses a threat to the universality of human rights.”
Human Rights Watch (1999) [2]
Contents
Official narrative
Problems
Children have a right to be forced to go to school:- "Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory."[3]
Examples
Page name | Description |
---|---|
Bioethics | The study of the ethical issues emerging from advances in biology, medicine and technologies. The field was marked by several treaties protecting individual rights, but during COVID-19, bioethical academics surpassed each other in supporting blatantly unethical schemes. |
Declaration of Helsinki | A set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation developed originally in 1964 for the medical community by the World Medical Association regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics |
Right to a fair trial |
Related Quotations
Page | Quote | Author | Date |
---|---|---|---|
"State of emergency" | “Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away, They're privileges.” | George Carlin | |
"Strike Hard Campaign" | “The Strike Hard Campaign has shown complete disregard for the rights of Turkic Muslims to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. In Xinjiang, authorities have created a system that considers individuals suspicious based on broad and dubious criteria, and then generates lists of people to be evaluated by officials for detention. Official documents state that individuals “who ought to be taken, should be taken,” suggesting the goal is to maximize the number of people they find “untrustworthy” in detention. Such people are then subjected to police interrogation without basic procedural protections. They have no right to legal counsel, and some are subjected to torture and mistreatment, for which they have no effective redress, as we have documented in our September 2018 report. The result is Chinese authorities, bolstered by technology, arbitrarily and indefinitely detaining Turkic Muslims in Xinjiang en masse for actions and behavior that are not crimes under Chinese law.” | 1 May 2019 | |
Harry Ferguson | “Sadly, my advice today to any aspiring recruit who values the defence of human rights would be to stay away and do something better with their lives. The intelligence services are not what they were. Above all, they have forgotten the lessons that we learned during the struggle against Irish terrorism: that brutality and injustice are not the answer, they simply fuel the next generation of terrorists.” | Harry Ferguson | |
Alex Karp | “Palantir CEO Alex Carp, whose company’s data-mining software helps the IDF killing machine to select targets including 18,000 innocent children, says we need to scrap the First Amendment to target antisemitism in America…🇮🇱🇺🇸” | Alex Karp Pelham | 5 September 2024 |
Related Documents
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:House Negro | book extract | 1 March 2012 | Denis Rancourt | |
Document:Human Rights Record of the United States in 2013 | report | 28 February 2014 | China | A report on the Human rights record of the USA through 2013. An official publication of the government of the Peoples Republic of China. A response to the hypocricy of the US government in publishing similar reports on 200 countries and excluding itself - Clearly the US considers itself exempt in such matters. |
Document:Severe humanitarian disasters caused by US aggressive wars against foreign countries | report | 11 April 2021 | The China Society for Human Rights Studies | |
Document:UK PM Covers Up Crimes Against Humanity – Lectures Sri Lanka on Crimes Against Humanity | article | 19 November 2013 | Felicity Arbuthnot | A juxtaposition of the sanctimonious posturing of UK PM David Cameron at the opening of the Commonwealth heads of government conference over Sri Lanka's human rights record, with his own machinations to prevent the Chilcot Inquiry publishing papers fundamental to the understanding of how Blair and Bush engineered the Iraq war. |
File:EstablishingNewNormal.pdf | report | July 2010 | American Civil Liberties Union | Under the Obama Administration |
File:ICJ report 16-2-09.pdf | report | 2009 | This report of the Eminent Jurists Panel, based on one a comprehensive surveys on counter-terrorism and human rights, illustrates how 9-11 has influenced the rollback of civil liberties. | |
File:The CIA in Western Europe and the Abuse of Human Rights.pdf | paper | October 2006 | Daniele Ganser | A paper addressing assertions from the US State Department that US Field Manual FM30-31B was a Soviet forgery. |
File:UN-Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.pdf | report | 4 January 2011 | UN Working Group | The report of the UN Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1. |
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights | Wikispooks Page | UNESCO | UNESCO Declaration stating that "Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice." |
References
- ↑ "Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)"
- ↑ 1999 World Report Introduction
- ↑ Article 26, Universal Declaration of Human Rights