Difference between revisions of "Wikispooks:Editor Undertakings"
(less bold) |
(update and simplify policy) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''The existing editors require that all new members of their team agree to act in good faith''', as explained below: | '''The existing editors require that all new members of their team agree to act in good faith''', as explained below: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
| − | Spam and vandalism lead to a registered users only policy for editing. This restriction was not taken lightly, but it is considered necessary because ''WikiSpooks is NOT intended to reflect corporate-sponsored worldviews but | + | Spam and vandalism lead to a registered users only policy for editing. This restriction was not taken lightly, but it is considered necessary because ''WikiSpooks is NOT intended to reflect corporate-sponsored worldviews but to facilitate those whose careful study of the evidence has lead them to fundamentally question the narratives told by the {{ccm}}.'' Editing this site is a privilege which can and will be removed should this undertaking be persistently breached. The aim of requiring editors to register, and making registration conditional on acceptance of this undertaking is to exclude those who are fundamentally opposed to the entire [[Project:Site Rationale|site rationale]] and its existence. |
== Party politics == | == Party politics == | ||
{{FA|Party politics}} | {{FA|Party politics}} | ||
| − | [[image:Vote-squeezer.jpg|left| | + | [[image:Vote-squeezer.jpg|left|266px]] |
'''Neither left nor right is superior; they are merely two sides of the same [[establishment]] coin'''. | '''Neither left nor right is superior; they are merely two sides of the same [[establishment]] coin'''. | ||
| − | [[Deep Politics]] posits that existing establishment groups are more or less hopelessly co-opted by [[deep state]] groups. The function of established political parties is to preserve the status quo by promoting an endless energy-sapping and distracting dispute between their respective adherents over relative trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable. Far from being opposites, Left or Right, in the political sense are both ''de facto'' supporters of the establishment. Whether [[war]]s are fought for | + | [[Deep Politics]] posits that existing establishment groups are more or less hopelessly co-opted by [[deep state]] groups. The function of established political parties is to preserve the status quo by promoting an endless energy-sapping and distracting dispute between their respective adherents over relative trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable. Far from being opposites, Left or Right, in the political sense are both ''de facto'' supporters of the establishment. Whether [[war]]s are fought for "[[humanitarian intervention]]", to "fight [[terrorism]]" or for whatever other superficial [[casus belli]], makes no difference. The ''real'' reasons - ''the elephants in the room'' - remain hidden and discussion of them off limits. For practical evidence of this thesis, consider the gulf between [[Barack Obama]]'s campaign promises and his actions on assuming the [[US Presidency]]. |
==No barrier to debate== | ==No barrier to debate== | ||
| − | None of this is intended as a barrier to | + | None of this is intended as a barrier to evidence-based contributions that are intended to refine our collective understanding of [[deep political]] phenomena. It is simply to make it crystal clear that WikiSpooks is ''not'' the place for the promotion of [[Project:Definitions|Establishment]] organisations or [[Project:Definitions|official narrative]]s. |
== Editor undertakings == | == Editor undertakings == | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
#*ii) for money or any other consideration of personal material benefit</li> | #*ii) for money or any other consideration of personal material benefit</li> | ||
#If my edits are reversed by another editor: | #If my edits are reversed by another editor: | ||
| − | #*i) I will ''not'' simply re-reverse the edit without launching a | + | #*i) I will ''not'' simply re-reverse the edit without launching a discussion on the corresponding talk page; |
#*ii) If agreement is not reached, I will ask site administrator to help arbitrate any such dispute; | #*ii) If agreement is not reached, I will ask site administrator to help arbitrate any such dispute; | ||
#*iii) I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to differences of opinion. | #*iii) I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to differences of opinion. | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 28 October 2017
The existing editors require that all new members of their team agree to act in good faith, as explained below:
Introduction
Spam and vandalism lead to a registered users only policy for editing. This restriction was not taken lightly, but it is considered necessary because WikiSpooks is NOT intended to reflect corporate-sponsored worldviews but to facilitate those whose careful study of the evidence has lead them to fundamentally question the narratives told by the commercially-controlled media. Editing this site is a privilege which can and will be removed should this undertaking be persistently breached. The aim of requiring editors to register, and making registration conditional on acceptance of this undertaking is to exclude those who are fundamentally opposed to the entire site rationale and its existence.
Party politics
- Full article: Party politics
- Full article: Party politics
Neither left nor right is superior; they are merely two sides of the same establishment coin.
Deep Politics posits that existing establishment groups are more or less hopelessly co-opted by deep state groups. The function of established political parties is to preserve the status quo by promoting an endless energy-sapping and distracting dispute between their respective adherents over relative trivia, whilst cultivating a solid consensus on epoch-defining issues - usually by ignoring them totally until they become unavoidable. Far from being opposites, Left or Right, in the political sense are both de facto supporters of the establishment. Whether wars are fought for "humanitarian intervention", to "fight terrorism" or for whatever other superficial casus belli, makes no difference. The real reasons - the elephants in the room - remain hidden and discussion of them off limits. For practical evidence of this thesis, consider the gulf between Barack Obama's campaign promises and his actions on assuming the US Presidency.
No barrier to debate
None of this is intended as a barrier to evidence-based contributions that are intended to refine our collective understanding of deep political phenomena. It is simply to make it crystal clear that WikiSpooks is not the place for the promotion of Establishment organisations or official narratives.
Editor undertakings
By registering, editors agree that:
- I understand and am broadly sympathetic to the rationale and purpose of the WikiSpooks site.
- I will cite appropriate evidence to support my edits where possible.
- I will not edit...
- i) at the behest of any third party - especially not an "authoritative" third party
- ii) for money or any other consideration of personal material benefit
- If my edits are reversed by another editor:
- i) I will not simply re-reverse the edit without launching a discussion on the corresponding talk page;
- ii) If agreement is not reached, I will ask site administrator to help arbitrate any such dispute;
- iii) I will at all times maintain a courteous approach to differences of opinion.
- I understand that although vigorous debate is welcome, ad hominem[1] attacks are not.
References
| ||||||
|
