Difference between revisions of "Bruce Anderson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Stub) |
(desc expand) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{person | {{person | ||
| − | | | + | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Anderson_%28columnist%29 |
| − | |constitutes= | + | |constitutes=journalist, editor, deep state actor |
| − | |description=Le Cercle | + | |image=Bruce Anderson.jpg |
| − | }} | + | |description=UK pro-torture [[spooky]] journalist, [[Le Cercle]], attended a "[[terrorism]]" related conference chaired by [[Harold Elletson]] in 2009. |
| + | |nationality=UK | ||
| + | |birth_date=1949 | ||
| + | |birth_place=Orkney Islands | ||
| + | }}'''Bruce Anderson''' is a [[UK]] political [[columnist]], who as of 2015 was working as a freelancer. Formerly he was a political editor at ''[[The Spectator]]'' and as of 2015 he was still writing for them.<ref>http://new.spectator.co.uk/2015/05/david-cameron-is-too-happy-to-be-a-great-warrior-politician/</ref> Anderson has written for the ''[[Daily Mail]]'', and wrote for the ''[[The Independent]]'' newspaper from 2003 to September 2010, and ''[[ConservativeHome]]'' until 2012. | ||
| − | + | ==Activities== | |
| + | [[Francis Elliot]] and [[James Hanning]] state that it may have been Anderson who recommended the young [[David Cameron]] to [[UK Prime Minister]] [[John Major]] as part of his question time team in the early 1990s.<ref>https://isgp-studies.com/Le_Cercle_membership_list</ref> | ||
| − | + | ==Opinions== | |
| − | + | Bruce Anderson argued against extending the right to | |
| − | ==Advocacy of torture== | + | {{SMWQ |
| + | |date= | ||
| + | text=If a [[terrorist]] suspect is worth detaining for four days, let alone 42, we need to know everything about his plans in hours, if not minutes. His arrest might provoke his associates – uninterested in their own survival – to accelerate their atrocity. If [[MI5]] needs another £100m to ensure that captured information is analysed as fast as possible, no money could be better spent. | ||
| + | |source_URL=https://web.archive.org/web/20080702010621/http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/bruce-anderson/bruce-anderson-the-government-is-pursuing-the-42day-law-for-the-basest-of-party-political-reasons-842801.html | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Advocacy of torture=== | ||
Bruce Anderson has been an advocate of [[torture]] in [[ticking time bomb scenario]]s, even before [[9-11]] brought the question to greater public prominence. In February 2010 he wrote a column for ''[[The Independent]]'', arguing that the British government would have not just the right, but the duty, to torture if there was a ticking bomb, and that they should torture children if they believed that doing so would yield information that would avert a terrorist attack: | Bruce Anderson has been an advocate of [[torture]] in [[ticking time bomb scenario]]s, even before [[9-11]] brought the question to greater public prominence. In February 2010 he wrote a column for ''[[The Independent]]'', arguing that the British government would have not just the right, but the duty, to torture if there was a ticking bomb, and that they should torture children if they believed that doing so would yield information that would avert a terrorist attack: | ||
{{QB|It came, in the form of a devilish intellectual challenge. "Let's take your hypothesis a bit further. We have captured a terrorist, but he is a hardened character. We cannot be certain that he will crack in time. We have also captured his wife and children". After much agonising, I have come to the conclusion that there is only one answer to Sydney's question. Torture the wife and children.<ref>Bruce Anderson [http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/bruce-anderson/bruce-anderson-we-not-only-have-a-right-to-use-torture-we-have-a-duty-1899555.html "We not only have a right to use torture. We have a duty"], ''The Independent'', 16 February 2010</ref>}} | {{QB|It came, in the form of a devilish intellectual challenge. "Let's take your hypothesis a bit further. We have captured a terrorist, but he is a hardened character. We cannot be certain that he will crack in time. We have also captured his wife and children". After much agonising, I have come to the conclusion that there is only one answer to Sydney's question. Torture the wife and children.<ref>Bruce Anderson [http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/bruce-anderson/bruce-anderson-we-not-only-have-a-right-to-use-torture-we-have-a-duty-1899555.html "We not only have a right to use torture. We have a duty"], ''The Independent'', 16 February 2010</ref>}} | ||
| − | == Deep | + | == Deep Political connections== |
He attended [[Le Cercle]]. | He attended [[Le Cercle]]. | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:18, 23 February 2020
 Bruce Anderson    (journalist, editor, deep state actor) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | 1949 Orkney Islands |
| Nationality | UK |
| Member of | Le Cercle |
UK pro-torture spooky journalist, Le Cercle, attended a "terrorism" related conference chaired by Harold Elletson in 2009. | |
Bruce Anderson is a UK political columnist, who as of 2015 was working as a freelancer. Formerly he was a political editor at The Spectator and as of 2015 he was still writing for them.[1] Anderson has written for the Daily Mail, and wrote for the The Independent newspaper from 2003 to September 2010, and ConservativeHome until 2012.
Contents
Activities
Francis Elliot and James Hanning state that it may have been Anderson who recommended the young David Cameron to UK Prime Minister John Major as part of his question time team in the early 1990s.[2]
Opinions
Bruce Anderson argued against extending the right to
Advocacy of torture
Bruce Anderson has been an advocate of torture in ticking time bomb scenarios, even before 9-11 brought the question to greater public prominence. In February 2010 he wrote a column for The Independent, arguing that the British government would have not just the right, but the duty, to torture if there was a ticking bomb, and that they should torture children if they believed that doing so would yield information that would avert a terrorist attack:
It came, in the form of a devilish intellectual challenge. "Let's take your hypothesis a bit further. We have captured a terrorist, but he is a hardened character. We cannot be certain that he will crack in time. We have also captured his wife and children". After much agonising, I have come to the conclusion that there is only one answer to Sydney's question. Torture the wife and children.[3]
Deep Political connections
He attended Le Cercle.
Event Participated in
| Event | Start | End | Location(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security and Defence Learning/2009 | 2 December 2009 | 2 December 2009 | Berlin Hotel InterContinental | 5th of a series of 8 spooky conferences |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ http://new.spectator.co.uk/2015/05/david-cameron-is-too-happy-to-be-a-great-warrior-politician/
- ↑ https://isgp-studies.com/Le_Cercle_membership_list
- ↑ Bruce Anderson "We not only have a right to use torture. We have a duty", The Independent, 16 February 2010
