Difference between revisions of "Civil asset forfeiture"
(maritime law) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|description=A "controversial" US government policy in which property is forcibly transferred to government agencies from its legal owners because they suspect it may have been derived from criminal activity. | |description=A "controversial" US government policy in which property is forcibly transferred to government agencies from its legal owners because they suspect it may have been derived from criminal activity. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''Civil asset forfeiture''', or '''Civil seizure''' is the forced removal of property by [[authorities]] without having to prove that it was gained illegally. While people are assumed innocent unless proved guilty, this is not sufficient in some countries (notably the [[USA]]) to prevent their property being forfeit. If they wish to try to get back the seized property, owners must prove, at their own expense, that it was not accrued through criminal activity. In 2014, the total value of property taken by USA government agencies exceeded the amount stolen from USA citizens by burglars. | + | '''Civil asset forfeiture''', or '''Civil seizure''' is the forced removal of property by [[authorities]] without having to prove that it was gained illegally. While people are assumed innocent unless proved guilty, this is not sufficient in some countries (notably the [[USA]]) to prevent their property being forfeit. If they wish to try to get back the seized property, owners must prove, at their own expense, that it was not accrued through criminal activity. In [[2014]], the total value of property taken by USA government agencies exceeded the amount stolen from USA citizens by burglars. |
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[image:asset forfeitures surpass burglaries.png|left|480px|thumbnail|Image credit: Washington Post]] | [[image:asset forfeitures surpass burglaries.png|left|480px|thumbnail|Image credit: Washington Post]] | ||
The practice is widespread in USA, but was abolished in [[New Mexico]] in 2015. Different standards of proof are required in different states. [[NYPD]] has draconian civil asset forfeiture laws.<ref>http://theantimedia.org/nypd-steals-18000-knife-law/</ref> | The practice is widespread in USA, but was abolished in [[New Mexico]] in 2015. Different standards of proof are required in different states. [[NYPD]] has draconian civil asset forfeiture laws.<ref>http://theantimedia.org/nypd-steals-18000-knife-law/</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Fees== | ||
| + | Even in cases when assets ''are'' returned to victims, legal costs are not refunded unless a formal judgment is returned, leading some agencies (including the [[DEA]]) to deliberately conclude a case by returning the forfeited assets at the conclusion of a case which they are going to lose, to prevent the verdict which would allows the victims to reclaim legal expenses. This has resulted in an 88% non-contest rate, according to one 2015 estimate.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/police-take-girls-birthday-cash-and-stick-mother-with-fees</ref> | ||
==Rise and rise== | ==Rise and rise== | ||
In USA, according to official statistics, some $93.7 million of property were seized in [[1986]]. By 2004, this had risen to $567 million,<ref>http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/08/property-civil-forfeiture.html</ref> and $1.6 billion by 2008. In 2010, it was $2.5 billion. The ''[[Washington Post]]'' reported in November 2015 that "in 2014, for the first time ever, law enforcement officers took more property from American citizens than burglars did."<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/</ref> | In USA, according to official statistics, some $93.7 million of property were seized in [[1986]]. By 2004, this had risen to $567 million,<ref>http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/08/property-civil-forfeiture.html</ref> and $1.6 billion by 2008. In 2010, it was $2.5 billion. The ''[[Washington Post]]'' reported in November 2015 that "in 2014, for the first time ever, law enforcement officers took more property from American citizens than burglars did."<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/</ref> | ||
| + | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:39, 5 December 2019
 Civil asset forfeiture  (theft)   | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interest of | • DEA • Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| A "controversial" US government policy in which property is forcibly transferred to government agencies from its legal owners because they suspect it may have been derived from criminal activity. | |
Civil asset forfeiture, or Civil seizure is the forced removal of property by authorities without having to prove that it was gained illegally. While people are assumed innocent unless proved guilty, this is not sufficient in some countries (notably the USA) to prevent their property being forfeit. If they wish to try to get back the seized property, owners must prove, at their own expense, that it was not accrued through criminal activity. In 2014, the total value of property taken by USA government agencies exceeded the amount stolen from USA citizens by burglars.
Official narrative
Civil asset forfeiture was introduced under Ronald Reagan's expansion of the "war on drugs" although the practice of seizing assets dates back "at least to 17th-century maritime law, under which ships illegally transporting goods would be seized, along with the contraband inside."[1]
In 2016, California banned the practice unless the victims were found guilty of committing a crime.[2] As of 2017, the practice is drawing increasing criticism for bringing the law into disrepute[3] and even Wikipedia admits that the practice is "controversial".[4]
Prevalence
The practice is widespread in USA, but was abolished in New Mexico in 2015. Different standards of proof are required in different states. NYPD has draconian civil asset forfeiture laws.[5]
Fees
Even in cases when assets are returned to victims, legal costs are not refunded unless a formal judgment is returned, leading some agencies (including the DEA) to deliberately conclude a case by returning the forfeited assets at the conclusion of a case which they are going to lose, to prevent the verdict which would allows the victims to reclaim legal expenses. This has resulted in an 88% non-contest rate, according to one 2015 estimate.[6]
Rise and rise
In USA, according to official statistics, some $93.7 million of property were seized in 1986. By 2004, this had risen to $567 million,[7] and $1.6 billion by 2008. In 2010, it was $2.5 billion. The Washington Post reported in November 2015 that "in 2014, for the first time ever, law enforcement officers took more property from American citizens than burglars did."[8]
References
- ↑ http://www.nationalreview.com/article/448942/asset-forfeiture-police-abuse-it-all-time
- ↑ http://thefreethoughtproject.com/theft-robbery-police-ban-california/
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/03/06/justice-thomas-sharply-criticizes-civil-forfeiture-laws/
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States&oldid=765229752
- ↑ http://theantimedia.org/nypd-steals-18000-knife-law/
- ↑ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/police-take-girls-birthday-cash-and-stick-mother-with-fees
- ↑ http://www.forbes.com/2011/06/08/property-civil-forfeiture.html
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/
