Difference between revisions of "COVID-19/Legislation"
m (→UK) |
("Fake News") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==By nation== | ==By nation== | ||
==Hungary== | ==Hungary== | ||
| − | [[Hungarian Prime Minister]] [[Viktor Orbán]] passed a “coronavirus” law passed, "allowing him rule by decree during the [[state of emergency]] for an indefinite period."<ref>https://rsf.org/en/news/orbans-orwellian-law-paves-way-information-police-state-hungary</ref> | + | [[Hungarian Prime Minister]] [[Viktor Orbán]] passed a “coronavirus” law passed, "allowing him rule by decree during the [[state of emergency]] for an indefinite period." The legislation includes a provision for sentences of up to five years in prison for spreading "[[fake news]]". [[Reporters Without Borders]] stated that "in reality it is the government that can, at the outset, arbitrarily decide whether a media report is true or false."<ref>https://rsf.org/en/news/orbans-orwellian-law-paves-way-information-police-state-hungary</ref> |
==Israel== | ==Israel== | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 6 April 2020
 COVID-19/Legislation(legislation)   | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Westminster Foundation For Democracy |
Many nation states have passed legislation with a titular connection to the coronavirus. Generally this circumvents existing legal restrictions or civil liberties for the "national interest" of slowing virus transmission rates.
By nation
Hungary
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán passed a “coronavirus” law passed, "allowing him rule by decree during the state of emergency for an indefinite period." The legislation includes a provision for sentences of up to five years in prison for spreading "fake news". Reporters Without Borders stated that "in reality it is the government that can, at the outset, arbitrarily decide whether a media report is true or false."[1]
Israel
UK
Although the UK government stated that "As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK",[2] the 329 page 2020 Coronavirus Bill was introduced to parliament on 22 March and made law on 25 March.[3] Silkie Carlo, termed it "the greatest loss of liberty in our history".[4]
Purposes
Many nation states used cellphone data to track citizens. By early April 2020 this included Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Israel,[5] Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and the US. Poland offered people in quarantine a choice: "either receive unexpected visits from the police, or download this app".[6]
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Face mask | From an obscure phenomenon, face masks became a central part of the COVID-19 psychological operation starting in March 2020. |
| Online Safety Bill | Proposed piece of landmark legislation which will enable internet censorship in Great Britain |
| PCSC Bill | UK law |
References
- ↑ https://rsf.org/en/news/orbans-orwellian-law-paves-way-information-police-state-hungary
- ↑ https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
- ↑ https://services.parliament.uk/Bills/2019-21/coronavirus.html
- ↑ https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/03/25/coronavirus-bill-the-greatest-loss-of-liberty-in-our-history/
- ↑ https://www.cnet.com/news/israel-is-tracking-phone-location-data-to-fight-covid-19-reports-say/
- ↑ https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-tracking-citizens-phones-coronavirus-2020-3
