Difference between revisions of "Katherine Forrest"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - " Salon.com" to " Salon.com")
(description, tidy references)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|image=Katherine_B._Forrest.jpg
 
|image=Katherine_B._Forrest.jpg
 
|constitutes=judge
 
|constitutes=judge
 +
|description=NY Judge in the cases 'U.S.A. v. Ulbricht', where she refused the defense attorney's efforts to get facts about corrupt [[DEA]] agents into the court record; and in 'Hedges v. Obama'.
 
|alma_mater=Wesleyan University, New York University
 
|alma_mater=Wesleyan University, New York University
|birth_date=1964-02-13
+
|birth_date=February 13, 1964
 
|birth_name=Katherine Bolan Forrest
 
|birth_name=Katherine Bolan Forrest
 
|birth_place=New York City, New York, U.S.
 
|birth_place=New York City, New York, U.S.
Line 10: Line 11:
 
|title=Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
 
|title=Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
 
|start=October 17, 2011
 
|start=October 17, 2011
|end=
+
|end=September 11, 2018
 
}}
 
}}
 
}}
 
}}
 +
'''Katherine Bolan Forrest''' is a partner at New York law firm [[Cravath, Swaine & Moore]] LLP, and a former [[United States District Judge]] of the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]].
  
 
==Career==
 
==Career==
On May 4, 2011, [[Barack Obama]] nominated Forrest to fill a judicial seat on the [[United States District Court]] for the Southern District of New York that had been vacated by Judge [[Jed S. Rakoff]], who took [[senior status]] at the end of 2010.<ref>{{Cite web | author=The White House: Office of the Press Secretary | url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/04/nomination-s-sent-senate | title=Nominations Sent to the Senate | work=[[whitehouse.gov]] | date=May 4, 2011 | accessdate=May 7, 2011}}</ref> Forrest was nominated by Obama to the bench in May 2011 on the recommendation of U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York.<ref name="Bloomberg20130206">{{cite news|title=Military Arrest in Doubt as U.S. Fights Rookie Judge|url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-06/obama-appointed-judge-faces-test-over-ruling-against-terror-law|accessdate=6 February 2013|newspaper=Bloomberg Businessweek|date=6 February 2013|author=Bob Van Voris}}</ref>
+
On May 4, 2011, [[Barack Obama]] nominated Forrest to fill a judicial seat on the [[United States District Court]] for the Southern District of New York that had been vacated by Judge [[Jed S. Rakoff]], who took [[senior status]] at the end of 2010.<ref>http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/04/nomination-s-sent-senate</ref> Forrest was nominated by Obama to the bench in May 2011 on the recommendation of U.S. Senator [[Charles Schumer]] of New York.<ref name="Bloomberg20130206">{http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-02-06/obama-appointed-judge-faces-test-over-ruling-against-terror-law</ref>
  
 
== Significant cases ==
 
== Significant cases ==
  
 
===Hedges v. Obama===
 
===Hedges v. Obama===
On May 16, 2012, in ''[[Hedges v. Obama]]'', Forrest blocked enforcement the [[National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012|National Defense Authorization Act]]'s indefinite detention provision.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/16/us-usa-security-lawsuit-idUSBRE84F1HS20120516 Judge blocks indefinite military detention provision], Reuters. By Basil Katz. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2012.</ref> The ruling came as part of a suit challenging the NDAA as infringing "free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution."<ref>[http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/ Federal court enjoins NDAA], [[Salon.com]]. By Glenn Greenwald. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 17 May 2012.</ref><ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-16/military-detention-law-blocked-by-new-york-judge.html Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge], Bloomberg-News. By Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado. 17 May 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2012.</ref>  Forrest's ruling was unanimously reversed by a [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|appellate court]] panel on July 17th, 2013.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/hedges.pdf | author = United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | date = 17 July 2013 | title = Hedges v. Obama, 12-3176 (L)}}</ref>
+
On May 16, 2012, in ''[[Hedges v. Obama]]'', Forrest blocked enforcement the [[National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012|National Defense Authorization Act]]'s indefinite detention provision.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/16/us-usa-security-lawsuit-idUSBRE84F1HS20120516 Judge blocks indefinite military detention provision], Reuters. By Basil Katz. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2012.</ref> The ruling came as part of a suit challenging the NDAA as infringing "free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution."<ref>[http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/ Federal court enjoins NDAA], [[Salon.com]]. By Glenn Greenwald. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 17 May 2012.</ref><ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-16/military-detention-law-blocked-by-new-york-judge.html Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge], Bloomberg-News. By Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado. 17 May 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2012.</ref>  Forrest's ruling was unanimously reversed by a [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|appellate court]] panel on July 17th, 2013.<ref>http://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/hedges.pdf </ref>
  
 
===Price Fixing===
 
===Price Fixing===
In August 2014, Forrest dismissed a price-fixing suit against [[Goldman Sachs]], [[JP Morgan Chase]], and [[Glencore]]. She held that, although the defendant's actions did affect the aluminum marketplace, the plaintiffs failed to show the defendants had intended to manipulate prices.<ref>{{cite news | title = U.S. judge dismisses aluminum price-fixing litigation | date = 29 August 2014 | author = Stempel, Jonathan | work = Reuters | url = http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0QZ2KO20140829?irpc=932}}</ref>
+
In August 2014, Forrest dismissed a price-fixing suit against [[Goldman Sachs]], [[JP Morgan Chase]], and [[Glencore]]. She held that, although the defendant's actions did affect the aluminum marketplace, the plaintiffs failed to show the defendants had intended to manipulate prices.<ref>http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0QZ2KO20140829?irpc=932</ref>
  
 
===U.S.A. v. Ulbricht===
 
===U.S.A. v. Ulbricht===
In 2015, Forrest presided over a jury trial in ''[[U.S.A. v. Ulbricht]]'', where [[Ross William Ulbricht]] was accused of running the [[Silk_Road_(marketplace)|Silk Road]] online drug marketplace.<ref>{{cite news | author = Raymond, Nate | date = 12 January 2015 | title = Accused Silk Road creator goes to trial amid U.S. scrutiny of bitcoin | work = Reuters | accessdate = 30 May 2015 | url = http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/12/us-usa-bitcoin-trial-idUSKBN0KL0AW20150112}}</ref> She ruled that [[emoji]] are permissible court evidence.
+
In 2015, Forrest presided over a jury trial in ''[[U.S.A. v. Ulbricht]]'', where [[Ross William Ulbricht]] was accused of running the [[Silk_Road_(marketplace)|Silk Road]] online drug marketplace.<ref>http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/12/us-usa-bitcoin-trial-idUSKBN0KL0AW20150112</ref> She ruled that [[emoji]] are permissible court evidence.
  
She repeatedly rebuffed defense attorney [[Joshua Dratel]]'s efforts to get facts about the corrupt DEA agents into the court record. "The government’s considerable efforts at keeping this monumental scandal from being aired at Ross Ulbricht’s trial is itself scandalous,” said Dratel in a statement.  “It is clear from this (Bridges’) Complaint that fundamentally the government’s investigation of Mr. Ulbricht lacked any integrity, and was wholly and fatally compromised from the inside.” In response to a motion from prosecutors, Judge Forrest ruled that key portions of the testimony of [[Mark Karpeles]] (Mt. Gox CEO) would retroactively be declared inadmissible and removed from the trial record.<ref>http://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info/content/read_more/complexInfobox/site_news/infobox/elements/template/default/active_id/14790</ref>
+
She repeatedly rebuffed defense attorney [[Joshua Dratel]]'s efforts to get facts about the corrupt DEA agents into the court record. "The government’s considerable efforts at keeping this monumental scandal from being aired at Ross Ulbricht’s trial is itself scandalous,” said Dratel in a statement.  “It is clear from this (Bridges’) Complaint that fundamentally the government’s investigation of Mr. Ulbricht lacked any integrity, and was wholly and fatally compromised from the inside.” In response to a motion from prosecutors, Judge Forrest ruled that key portions of the testimony of [[Mark Karpeles]] (Mt. Gox CEO) would retroactively be declared inadmissible and removed from the trial record.<ref>http://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info/content/read_more/complexInfobox/site_news/infobox/elements/template/default/active_id/14790</ref><ref>http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Welcome+future+Emoji+admissable+court/10775243/story.html </ref>  
  
<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Welcome+future+Emoji+admissable+court/10775243/story.html | title = Welcome to the future: Emoji are admissable in court | work = Vancouver Sun | author = Rosen, Daniel | date = 30 January 2015 | accessdate = 20 May 2015}}</ref> During the course of the trial, Forrest was [[doxing|doxed]] on [[8chan]], where her full mailing address, phone number, and [[Social Security number]] were posted on the ''baphomet'' subboard.<ref name="silkroad">{{Cite web| title = Notorious 8chan "subboard" has history wiped after federal judge's doxing| first = Sam |last = Machkovech|work = Ars Technica| date = February 12, 2015| accessdate = February 13, 2015| url = http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/02/notorious-8chan-subboard-has-history-wiped-after-federal-judges-doxing/}}</ref> She sentenced Ulbricht to life in prison without the possibility of parole.<ref>{{cite news | author = Greenberg, Andy | date = 29 May 2015 | title = Silk Road Creator Ross Ulbricht Sentenced to Life in Prison | work = Wired | accessdate = 30 May 2015 | url = http://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-creator-ross-ulbricht-sentenced-life-prison/}}</ref>
+
During the course of the trial, Forrest was [[doxing|doxed]] on [[8chan]], where her full mailing address, phone number, and [[Social Security number]] were posted on the ''baphomet'' subboard.<ref name="silkroad">http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/02/notorious-8chan-subboard-has-history-wiped-after-federal-judges-doxing/</ref> She sentenced Ulbricht to life in prison without the possibility of parole.<ref>http://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-creator-ross-ulbricht-sentenced-life-prison/</ref>
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 06:21, 29 July 2021

Person.png Katherine Forrest  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(judge)
Katherine B. Forrest.jpg
BornKatherine Bolan Forrest
February 13, 1964
New York City, New York, U.S.
Alma materWesleyan University, New York University
NY Judge in the cases 'U.S.A. v. Ulbricht', where she refused the defense attorney's efforts to get facts about corrupt DEA agents into the court record; and in 'Hedges v. Obama'.

Katherine Bolan Forrest is a partner at New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Career

On May 4, 2011, Barack Obama nominated Forrest to fill a judicial seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that had been vacated by Judge Jed S. Rakoff, who took senior status at the end of 2010.[1] Forrest was nominated by Obama to the bench in May 2011 on the recommendation of U.S. Senator Charles Schumer of New York.[2]

Significant cases

Hedges v. Obama

On May 16, 2012, in Hedges v. Obama, Forrest blocked enforcement the National Defense Authorization Act's indefinite detention provision.[3] The ruling came as part of a suit challenging the NDAA as infringing "free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution."[4][5] Forrest's ruling was unanimously reversed by a appellate court panel on July 17th, 2013.[6]

Price Fixing

In August 2014, Forrest dismissed a price-fixing suit against Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and Glencore. She held that, although the defendant's actions did affect the aluminum marketplace, the plaintiffs failed to show the defendants had intended to manipulate prices.[7]

U.S.A. v. Ulbricht

In 2015, Forrest presided over a jury trial in U.S.A. v. Ulbricht, where Ross William Ulbricht was accused of running the Silk Road online drug marketplace.[8] She ruled that emoji are permissible court evidence.

She repeatedly rebuffed defense attorney Joshua Dratel's efforts to get facts about the corrupt DEA agents into the court record. "The government’s considerable efforts at keeping this monumental scandal from being aired at Ross Ulbricht’s trial is itself scandalous,” said Dratel in a statement. “It is clear from this (Bridges’) Complaint that fundamentally the government’s investigation of Mr. Ulbricht lacked any integrity, and was wholly and fatally compromised from the inside.” In response to a motion from prosecutors, Judge Forrest ruled that key portions of the testimony of Mark Karpeles (Mt. Gox CEO) would retroactively be declared inadmissible and removed from the trial record.[9][10]

During the course of the trial, Forrest was doxed on 8chan, where her full mailing address, phone number, and Social Security number were posted on the baphomet subboard.[11] She sentenced Ulbricht to life in prison without the possibility of parole.[12]

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References