Nicholson Baker

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 04:26, 30 August 2021 by UKpeacelibertyfreedom (talk | contribs) (Created the page.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Person.png Nicholson Baker   TwitterRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(writer)
NationalityAmerican
American writer

Nicholson Baker is an American writer.

In January 2021, he wrote an article in The New Yorker where he criticised the ON around COVID.[1]


 

Quotes by Nicholson Baker

PageQuoteDateSource
COVID-19/Censorship“If one of the first thoughts that goes through the head of a lab director at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is that the new coronavirus could have come from her lab, then we are obliged to entertain the scientific possibility that it could indeed have come from her lab. Right then, there should have been a comprehensive, pockets-inside-out, fully public investigation of the Virology Institute, along with the other important virus labs in Wuhan, including the one close by the seafood market, headquarters of the Wuhan CDC. There should have been interviews with scientists, interviews with biosafety teams, close parsings of laboratory notebooks, freezer and plumbing and decontamination systems checks — everything. It didn’t happen. The Wuhan Institute of Virology closed down its databases of viral genomes, and the Chinese Ministry of Education sent out a directive: “Any paper that traces the origin of the virus must be strictly and tightly managed.””4 January 2021The New Yorker
Anthony Fauci“After the 9/11 attacks, and the mysterious anthrax mailings that began a week later (which said, “TAKE PENACILIN [sic] NOW / DEATH TO AMERICA / DEATH TO ISRAEL / ALLAH IS GREAT”), the desire for biopreparedness became all consuming. Now there were emerging biothreats from humans as well as from the evolving natural world. Fauci’s anti-terror budget went from $53 million in 2001 to $1.7 billion in 2003.”4 January 2021The New Yorker
New York Times“On January 8, 2012, the New York Times published a scorcher of an editorial, “An Engineered Doomsday.” “We cannot say there would be no benefits at all from studying the virus,” the Times said. “But the consequences, should the virus escape, are too devastating to risk.””4 January 2021The New Yorker
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References