Adam Larson

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 14:03, 26 November 2018 by Patrick Haseldine (talk | contribs) (Inaugurating)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Person.png Adam Larson Facebook TwitterRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(blogger)
Adam Larson.png
Member ofJustice for Megrahi, Working Group on Syria Propaganda and Media
Interests • 9/11
• Pan Am Flight 103

Adam J Larson whose screen name is Caustic Logic began blogging on the James Randi Educational Foundation ("an educational resource on the paranormal, pseudoscientific and the supernatural") website in 2007, where he sought "to get a better grip on some aspects of the 9/11 attacks and test my own half-informed hunches."[1]

In 2009, Caustic Logic proceeded to cooperate with Rolfe (Morag Kerr) on the JREF forum in taking a skeptical look at the Lockerbie bombing Official Narrative, and he subsequently created the Lockerbie Divide website.[2]

Seven-year absence

In November 2018, Adam Larson wrote:

I haven't added to this site or to Lockerbie studies since early 2011, off looking into allegations behind the Libya campaign, similar in Syria, and other places. This was, like many things, a passing intense interest, with only a mild long-term investment. Though Syria has really caught my attention solidly from 2012 to now, I tend to dig in, figure out, move on to figure out other things. It all adds up over time. And I do revisit things sometimes...

But as the 30th anniversary of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 draws near, I was approached by the well-read Kevin Bannon to publish this essay on Abdelbaset al-Megrahi's conviction. It seems like a solid an informative analysis, focusing on the central identification evidence of the compromised and malleable star witness Tony Gauci. Of course this is not the only serious weakness in the case, but perhaps the most important one. And it's really, really weak.

Bannon's analysis of trial transcripts and other available evidence covers the issues thoroughly, adding some details I wasn't aware of, especially regarding the extremely flawed legal defence Mr Megrahi received at the 2000 trial, and at what was then a first and only appeal in 2002. This becomes a second focus of the essay, with the flawed defence "laid bare" in its failure to tear Gauci's testimony apart like it really deserved.

After losing the appeal, Megrahi would have been doomed but for a new law in Scotland, allowing a second appeal under circumstances he was deemed to meet. He was pursuing this into 2009 - with new counsel and a new strategy - when cancer and unclear agreements entered the picture. Something disputed in that mix led Megrahi to abandon his promising appeal, and led Scottish authorities to set the "Lockerbie bomber" free. He was flown home to Libya to live his final 33 months (not 3 as predicted) amid celebrations, then the chaos of Libya's "humanitarian" ruination in 2011.

This is where I first stopped poring over this case so many others like my old colleague Morag Kerr (whose book is amazing, and well-illustrated), and Kevin Bannon here, have covered so well. I felt more needed elsewhere, but the struggle for proper justice continues. As the UN trial observer Dr Hans Köchler is cited explaining below, Megrahi was never given a fair trial, in large part because he lacked effective defence counsel. We can't say just what caused it, be it simple ineptitude or some level of conspiracy, but the defence was demonstrably flawed in some very serious ways. Certainly, with a case this important to the UK and US governments, and also this fragile and deeply-flawed, the stakes and likelihood of somehow compromising the judges and/or the defence should be seen as high enough to really wonder about. They certainly got to Tony Gauci, for one. But that's my own thought. Now I turn it over to one of those still on the case, for the details.[3]

Larson's blogs

Adam Larson operates the following blogs:

 

Documents by Adam Larson

TitleDocument typePublication dateSubject(s)Description
Document:The Political Scientists of Lockerbie - Allen Feradayblog post26 October 2010Gibraltar shootings
Danny McNamee
Pan Am Flight 103/The Trial
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi
Alan Feraday
Defence Evaluation and Research Agency
Brighton bombing
John Berry
Hassan Assali
"Patrick Haseldine’s famously deleted Wikipedia page on Alan Feraday sums up nicely that he 'has appeared as an expert witness at criminal trials leading to convictions in at least four high-profile cases, three of which were subsequently overturned on appeal. The appeal in the fourth case is ongoing'.”
Document:The Political Scientists of Lockerbie - Thomas Hayesblog post22 October 2010Guildford Four and Maguire Seven
Pan Am Flight 103/The Trial
Abdelbaset al-Megrahi
Thomas Hayes
Defence Evaluation and Research Agency
Dr Thomas Hayes' testimony was central to the Lockerbie verdict. Yet he and two colleagues conspired to withhold evidence from the 1974 alleged IRA Maguire Seven trial which would have indicated innocence. The Maguires were freed on appeal after fifteen years in jail. This matter was exposed at the Lockerbie trial, but the Judges trusted Hayes' word implicitly.
Document:The Political Scientists of Lockerbie - Tom Thurmanblog post13 November 2010FBI
Thomas Thurman
Louis Freeh
Oklahoma City bombing
Frederic Whitehurst
MST-13 Timer
William Tobin
"When I raised my concerns with my managers at the FBI laboratory, all except for one of them reminded me that Tom Thurman was the “hero” behind determining the perpetrators of the Pan Am 103 disaster. I understood from that that the FBI would not expose these issues for fear that the investigation into the Pan Am 103 bombing would be seen as possibly flawed and this would open the FBI up to criticism and outside review."
Document:Who was the Maidan sniper mastermind?article29 May 2014Russia
2014 Ukraine coup/Maidan snipers
A good overall introduction to the false-flag nature of the Kiev Maidan sniper events in February 2014 that triggered the flight of President Yanukovitch and the installation of the 22 February coup Junta
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References