Difference between revisions of "Allan Francovich"
(Expanding and referencing) |
(→The Maltese Double Cross (1994): Critical review) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Productions== | ==Productions== | ||
− | ===The Maltese Double Cross | + | ==="The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie"=== |
− | [[File:Maltese_Double_Cross.jpg|400px|thumb|right| | + | [[File:Maltese_Double_Cross.jpg|400px|thumb|right|"The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie"]] |
{{FA|The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie}} | {{FA|The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie}} | ||
− | Allan Francovich produced, wrote and directed the documentary film [[The Maltese Double Cross]], which challenged the [[Lockerbie Official Narrative]] that Libya was responsible for the sabotage of [[Pan Am Flight 103]] on 21 December 1988. The film | + | Allan Francovich produced, wrote and directed the documentary film [[The Maltese Double Cross]], which challenged the [[Lockerbie Official Narrative]] that Libya was responsible for the sabotage of [[Pan Am Flight 103]] on 21 December 1988. The film suggests that the bomb was carried on board the feeder flight Pan Am 103A at Frankfurt airport by an unwitting drug mule, Khalid Jafaar, who had links to Hezbollah, the [[DEA]] and the [[CIA]]. |
When his British production company, Hemar Enterprises, released the film in November 1994, it was immediately threatened with legal action by lawyers acting for a US government official (possibly the DEA's Michael Hurley). Several screenings of the film were prevented, but Labour MP [[Tam Dalyell]] ignored libel warnings and showed the film at the British House of Commons on November 16, 1994. It was shown on UK national TV (Channel 4) on May 11, 1995.<ref>{{Citation | When his British production company, Hemar Enterprises, released the film in November 1994, it was immediately threatened with legal action by lawyers acting for a US government official (possibly the DEA's Michael Hurley). Several screenings of the film were prevented, but Labour MP [[Tam Dalyell]] ignored libel warnings and showed the film at the British House of Commons on November 16, 1994. It was shown on UK national TV (Channel 4) on May 11, 1995.<ref>{{Citation | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:"This argument was substantially undermined on November 15, 1991, only a day after the indictments were issued against the two Libyan accused. On that day the US State Department issued 'fact sheets' which detailed the evidence against the two accused. The information they contained has been repeated in numerous media reports and at least two books published in the UK since that time. One of the media reports was an item about how the Scottish and US authorities 'solved' the [[Lockerbie Bombing|Lockerbie case]], contained in a BBC 'How Do They Do That?' programme broadcast on February 15, 1994. It featured the former Chief Constable of Dumfries and Galloway Police, John Boyd. So far as we are aware, neither the [[Crown Office]] nor the [[Lord Advocate]] ever issued similarly critical statements against the BBC, John Boyd, or any of the other broadcasters, newspapers or book publishers which have raked over the evidence. | :"This argument was substantially undermined on November 15, 1991, only a day after the indictments were issued against the two Libyan accused. On that day the US State Department issued 'fact sheets' which detailed the evidence against the two accused. The information they contained has been repeated in numerous media reports and at least two books published in the UK since that time. One of the media reports was an item about how the Scottish and US authorities 'solved' the [[Lockerbie Bombing|Lockerbie case]], contained in a BBC 'How Do They Do That?' programme broadcast on February 15, 1994. It featured the former Chief Constable of Dumfries and Galloway Police, John Boyd. So far as we are aware, neither the [[Crown Office]] nor the [[Lord Advocate]] ever issued similarly critical statements against the BBC, John Boyd, or any of the other broadcasters, newspapers or book publishers which have raked over the evidence. | ||
:"The British and US authorities insist that the [[Lockerbie Bombing|Lockerbie case]] is still open. Yet during the months my team has been investigating the subject, not one approach has been made by these authorities to see any of the new evidence we have gathered. Is it any wonder that the Libyans are reluctant to stand trial in Scotland or the US?" | :"The British and US authorities insist that the [[Lockerbie Bombing|Lockerbie case]] is still open. Yet during the months my team has been investigating the subject, not one approach has been made by these authorities to see any of the new evidence we have gathered. Is it any wonder that the Libyans are reluctant to stand trial in Scotland or the US?" | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Critical review==== | ||
+ | [[John Ashton]] was researcher for the 1994 documentary film [[The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie]] about the 1988 bombing of [[Pan Am Flight 103]]. The film propounded a "drug conspiracy theory" as the motive for the bombing, a theory which was been ridiculed by [[Barry Walker]] (aka 'baz') as follows:<ref>[http://edsblogcity.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/blog-post.html?showComment=1259764729818#c1908785357458437719 "Critique of 'The Maltese Double Cross' by 'baz'"]</ref> | ||
+ | :Having watched the version televised by Channel 4 before the 'Lockerbie debate' many times I found this version of "[[The Maltese Double Cross]]" fascinating. It is far longer than the televised version and is significantly different. | ||
+ | :I have long been a critic of "[[The Maltese Double Cross]]" and "Cover-up of Convenience" written by the film's researcher [[John Ashton]] and [[Ian Ferguson]]. | ||
+ | :I have no objection to the first 1 hour and 36 minutes which was, to be honest, really very good. | ||
+ | :My objection is to the introduction of the 'drug conspiracy theory' between 1.36 and 2.16, in particular the section 1.55-2.16 and above all the blatantly fraudulent 'hotel room scene' featuring Oswald Le Winter between 2.12.50 and 02.15 (which was longer than the televised version and mentioned the character 'Lovejoy'.) | ||
+ | :In the far briefer televised version of Steve Donahue's 'evidence' he is described as an 'undercover DEA agent' with no mention of his being a convicted trafficker. The section concerning 'Mr Goldberg' and his supposed meeting with Khalid Jafaar is greatly different. | ||
+ | :While some of the 'evidence' is this forty-minute section (1.36-2.16) is demonstrably fabricated, my point is that even if these allegations of 'controlled' drug deliveries is true, is it of any relevance to the bombing? I would also point that the only evidence in the film that drugs were recovered at Tundergarth was an article in ''Private Eye'' magazine for whom [[John Ashton]] works. | ||
+ | :I also note that the evidence of Linda Forsyth that Matthew Gannon was sitting in 1st class was expunged although elsewhere the film claims on two other occasions that he was (once in Le Winter's staged 'evidence'). The official version is that he was in Business Class. | ||
+ | :My central criticism of "Cover-up of Convenience" is that most of the book was devoted to 'proving' this fraudulent section of the film. Without their obsession with Khalid Jafaar (which continues to this day in the pages of ''Private Eye'') Messrs [[John Ashton|Ashton]] and [[Ian Ferguson|Ferguson]] might have written an important book. | ||
+ | :Indeed without the 'drug conspiracy' section "[[The Maltese Double Cross]]" might have been a good film. Pity [[Allan Francovich|Francovich]] didn't grasp the bomb was introduced at Heathrow." | ||
+ | |||
+ | The full 2-hour 36-minute version of the film is available [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B5hv6scbBo here] on ''YouTube''. | ||
====Francovich a "charlatan"==== | ====Francovich a "charlatan"==== |
Revision as of 15:03, 28 October 2013
Allan Francovich (1941 – April 24, 1997) was an American film producer/director who made a series of films focused primarily on the activities of the CIA, though touching on other aspects of deep politics unaddressed in the commercially-controlled media. Francovich died in mysterious circumstances while going through customs at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, allegedly of a heart attack.[1]
Contents
Productions
"The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie"
- Full article: The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie
- Full article: The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie
Allan Francovich produced, wrote and directed the documentary film The Maltese Double Cross, which challenged the Lockerbie Official Narrative that Libya was responsible for the sabotage of Pan Am Flight 103 on 21 December 1988. The film suggests that the bomb was carried on board the feeder flight Pan Am 103A at Frankfurt airport by an unwitting drug mule, Khalid Jafaar, who had links to Hezbollah, the DEA and the CIA.
When his British production company, Hemar Enterprises, released the film in November 1994, it was immediately threatened with legal action by lawyers acting for a US government official (possibly the DEA's Michael Hurley). Several screenings of the film were prevented, but Labour MP Tam Dalyell ignored libel warnings and showed the film at the British House of Commons on November 16, 1994. It was shown on UK national TV (Channel 4) on May 11, 1995.[2], but possibly because of the likelihood of legal action, it has never been publicly screened in USA. It can however be viewed on the internet.[3].
Letter to The Guardian
The day after the Channel 4 broadcast, The Guardian published a letter from Francovich headed "The Lockerbie smears":[4]
- "The attacks by the UK and US authorities on my film "The Maltese Double Cross" ("UK and US scorn Lockerbie film", May 11) are exactly what we predicted would happen. The aim is to smear people in the film in order to divert attention from the mass of evidence that supports our claims.
- "The film shows how Lockerbie was masterminded by Iran and Syria, not Libya, and that the bomb got on the plane through a botched US intelligence operation based on Middle East drugs and hostages. Elements within western intelligence knew what was happening but failed to act. The authorities can never admit this, as to do so would make Watergate look like a vicar's tea party.
- "The smears referred to have been circulating for years and have been used to attack anyone who has suggested that US government agencies have dirty hands in the affair. The latest round of attacks was begun in a letter to Tam Dalyell MP by a Todd Leventhal, of the US Information Agency, who has the Orwellian title "Program Officer for Countering Disinformation and Misinformation". It is disturbing that the supposedly independent Scottish Crown Office should choose to repeat Leventhal's allegations without question.
- "The full Crown Office statement states that the Lord Advocate deprecates all attempts to give a version of the Lockerbie story while criminal proceedings are pending. It goes on: 'The proper place for such issues to be explored is in a criminal court.'
- "This argument was substantially undermined on November 15, 1991, only a day after the indictments were issued against the two Libyan accused. On that day the US State Department issued 'fact sheets' which detailed the evidence against the two accused. The information they contained has been repeated in numerous media reports and at least two books published in the UK since that time. One of the media reports was an item about how the Scottish and US authorities 'solved' the Lockerbie case, contained in a BBC 'How Do They Do That?' programme broadcast on February 15, 1994. It featured the former Chief Constable of Dumfries and Galloway Police, John Boyd. So far as we are aware, neither the Crown Office nor the Lord Advocate ever issued similarly critical statements against the BBC, John Boyd, or any of the other broadcasters, newspapers or book publishers which have raked over the evidence.
- "The British and US authorities insist that the Lockerbie case is still open. Yet during the months my team has been investigating the subject, not one approach has been made by these authorities to see any of the new evidence we have gathered. Is it any wonder that the Libyans are reluctant to stand trial in Scotland or the US?"
Critical review
John Ashton was researcher for the 1994 documentary film The Maltese Double Cross - Lockerbie about the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. The film propounded a "drug conspiracy theory" as the motive for the bombing, a theory which was been ridiculed by Barry Walker (aka 'baz') as follows:[5]
- Having watched the version televised by Channel 4 before the 'Lockerbie debate' many times I found this version of "The Maltese Double Cross" fascinating. It is far longer than the televised version and is significantly different.
- I have long been a critic of "The Maltese Double Cross" and "Cover-up of Convenience" written by the film's researcher John Ashton and Ian Ferguson.
- I have no objection to the first 1 hour and 36 minutes which was, to be honest, really very good.
- My objection is to the introduction of the 'drug conspiracy theory' between 1.36 and 2.16, in particular the section 1.55-2.16 and above all the blatantly fraudulent 'hotel room scene' featuring Oswald Le Winter between 2.12.50 and 02.15 (which was longer than the televised version and mentioned the character 'Lovejoy'.)
- In the far briefer televised version of Steve Donahue's 'evidence' he is described as an 'undercover DEA agent' with no mention of his being a convicted trafficker. The section concerning 'Mr Goldberg' and his supposed meeting with Khalid Jafaar is greatly different.
- While some of the 'evidence' is this forty-minute section (1.36-2.16) is demonstrably fabricated, my point is that even if these allegations of 'controlled' drug deliveries is true, is it of any relevance to the bombing? I would also point that the only evidence in the film that drugs were recovered at Tundergarth was an article in Private Eye magazine for whom John Ashton works.
- I also note that the evidence of Linda Forsyth that Matthew Gannon was sitting in 1st class was expunged although elsewhere the film claims on two other occasions that he was (once in Le Winter's staged 'evidence'). The official version is that he was in Business Class.
- My central criticism of "Cover-up of Convenience" is that most of the book was devoted to 'proving' this fraudulent section of the film. Without their obsession with Khalid Jafaar (which continues to this day in the pages of Private Eye) Messrs Ashton and Ferguson might have written an important book.
- Indeed without the 'drug conspiracy' section "The Maltese Double Cross" might have been a good film. Pity Francovich didn't grasp the bomb was introduced at Heathrow."
The full 2-hour 36-minute version of the film is available here on YouTube.
Francovich a "charlatan"
In July 2013, on Professor Black's blog, Lockerbie commentator Barry Walker accused Allan Francovich of peddling the "drug conspiracy theory"[6] and called him a "charlatan":
- Dear Professor Black,
- For the record I must protest about your censoring of my previous comment on the supposed grounds that it was defamatory. Indeed your use of the words "my target" may give anybody reading it the impression I had made some wild or intemperate claim. Perish the thought. However it is not actually clear to whom you were referring.
- From material outwith this blog it became clear that Edwin Bollier, possibly through cultural or language difficulties, may have taken Patrick Haseldine's claim to be Emeritus Professor of Lockerbie Studies seriously and was actually seeking his advice.
- I pointed out for Herr Bollier's benefit that Haseldine is not a Professor but the proprietor of a tea shop. As a gag I actually wrote that he had used the skills he had acquired in the Diplomatic Service to start his own business. This is not in the least defamatory and I certainly didn't call him a liar.
- There is a whiff of hypocrisy here. You are quite happy to publish the most outrageous insinuations, contradicted by historical fact, by others. (i.e. Ronald Reagan and George Bush somehow colluded in the murder of Archbishop Romero.) Very often I point out where claims are demonstrably untrue. While I have denounced others as charlatans and fabricators or even in Robert Baer's case as an "aviation terrorist" this is not defamatory.
- However your concern for Mr Haseldine's reputation and your fear of defamation proceedings might be slightly more credible if you had not posted the comment "Patrick Haseldine is a liar."[7]
- I take it the name Patrick Haseldine is not to be mentioned. While most followers purport to be interested in the truth I am as interested in claims that are untrue. However it is your blog but please don't insult my intelligence by pretending my comment was defamatory.[8]
Professor Black responded to Barry Walker:
- You are entirely mistaken about my concern being that the comment was defamatory of Patrick Haseldine. Your comments about him cause me not the slightest concern. What does cause me concern is your reference to people as charlatans, one recognised meaning of which is "a fraud". You are entitled to believe and to say that someone is wrong, wrongheaded, misconceived, wilfully blind. But you are not entitled to say, at least on a blog which I publish and for which I have legal responsibility, that someone [Allan Francovich] is a charlatan.[9]
Gladio (1992)
Allan Francovich interviewed parties involved in Operation Gladio, especially in Italy, and produced perhaps the most complete account on film of the Gladio/Stay Behind network.
Short Circuit (1985)
A Documentary about the murder of nuns in El Salvador.
On Company Business (1980)
An award winning documentary about the CIA, which made extensive use of interviews with current and former CIA employees.
Others
- Secret History : Murder in Mississippi (12 Dec, 1991)
- Dark Passage (1990)
- The Houses Are Full of Smoke (1987)
- Inside the CIA (1987)
- San Francisco Good Times (1977)
- Chile in the Heart (1975)
- The Lobster Pot (1973)
Death
Allan Francovich's death occurred while going through US customs at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas on April 17, 1997, age 56. It was ruled as occurring due to "natural causes" (i.e. heart attack) though its remarkable timing raises the clear possibility that it was not so simple.
References
- ↑ Obituary. The New York Times (May 3, 1997).
- ↑ Norton-Taylor, Richard (May 11, 1995), "UK and US scorn Lockerbie film", The GuardianPage Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ http://www.thedossier.info/video_cover-ups.htm - Scroll down to Allan Francovich - The Maltese Double Cross
- ↑ Francovich, Allan (May 12, 1995), "The Lockerbie smears", The GuardianPage Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ "Critique of 'The Maltese Double Cross' by 'baz'"
- ↑ "A Poisoned Pill - The Mysterious Life and Death of Ian Spiro"
- ↑ "Another Haseldine lie"
- ↑ "Francovich a 'charlatan'"
- ↑ "Not entitled to say 'charlatan'"
See also
- Lockerbie Official Narrative
- Cameron's Report on Lockerbie Forensic Evidence
- The Framing of al-Megrahi
- The How, Why and Who of Pan Am Flight 103
External links
Video
- Operation Gladio (1992) - Watch the complete documentary online
- Alternative Views #074: THE CIA: ON COMPANY BUSINESS (1980) - Allan Francovich talks with ex-CIA agent John Stockwell about On Company Business on Alternative Views
- Alternative Views #167: MAKING A MOVIE ABOUT THE CIA (1982) - Allan Francovich talks about On Company Business on Alternative Views