Difference between revisions of "International law"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{concept |WP=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law |constitutes=law }} {{SMWDocs}} ==References== {{reflist}} {{Stub}}")
 
(Add about Amy Baker B.)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
|WP=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law
+
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law
 
|constitutes=law
 
|constitutes=law
 
}}
 
}}
 +
"The one thing there has not been in the international response is accountability, either political or legal. To date, no person or institution has been held accountable for the destruction of a functioning state. No one has resigned or been fired; no one has been indicted or prosecuted. Incredibly, there has been no accountability in spite of the fact that this is not the first time the Americans and the British have teamed up in recent memory to wreck a state in the name of good intentions."<ref name=twas>[[Document:To Wreck A State - The New International Crime]] by [[Amy Baker Benjamin]]</ref>
 +
 +
[[Yale]] professor [[Paul Kahn]] noted over twenty years ago, “International law will not be taken seriously as a constraint on government policy as long as illegal behavior is divorced from personal consequences.”
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{Stub}}
 
{{Stub}}

Latest revision as of 08:47, 19 August 2016

Concept.png International law 
(law)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Interest of• John Bellinger
• Francis Boyle
• Michael Scharf
• Ian Townsend-Gault
• Ruth Wedgwood

"The one thing there has not been in the international response is accountability, either political or legal. To date, no person or institution has been held accountable for the destruction of a functioning state. No one has resigned or been fired; no one has been indicted or prosecuted. Incredibly, there has been no accountability in spite of the fact that this is not the first time the Americans and the British have teamed up in recent memory to wreck a state in the name of good intentions."[1]

Yale professor Paul Kahn noted over twenty years ago, “International law will not be taken seriously as a constraint on government policy as long as illegal behavior is divorced from personal consequences.”

 

Examples

Page nameDescription
UNGA Request for ICJ Advisory Opinion
UNSCR 2728/24Demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Watch the West continue to make a mockery of international lawblog post19 July 2024Jonathan CookThe World Court concludes that the Palestinians are owed massive reparations. At a bare minimum, western governments must recognise the state of Palestine and impose sanctions on Israel until it withdraws from the occupied territories.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.