Difference between revisions of "BBC/Propaganda"
(robert stuart's research) |
(→Update) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{event | {{event | ||
|constitutes=propaganda | |constitutes=propaganda | ||
| − | |perpetrators= | + | |perpetrators=UK/Deep state |
|image=BBC_Propaganda.jpg | |image=BBC_Propaganda.jpg | ||
| + | |start=18 October 1922 | ||
| + | |description=The BBC has been a tool of the [[UK deep state]] since its foundation in 1922. | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm... | The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==September 11, 2001== | ||
| + | Rather than investigate how the BBC evidenced [[foreknowledge of the destruction of WTC7]], or why in 2007, Richard Porter, a BBC Senior Editor incorrectly claimed that the BBC "no longer ha[d] the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage"<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html</ref>, the BBC instead produced three episodes of ''[[Conspiracy Files]]'' about the events of that day. | ||
==Dr Rola== | ==Dr Rola== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
[[Robert Stuart]] inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."<ref>https://bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/2015/07/22/bbc-upholds-complaint-re-substitution-of-napalm-bomb-footage/</ref> | [[Robert Stuart]] inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."<ref>https://bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/2015/07/22/bbc-upholds-complaint-re-substitution-of-napalm-bomb-footage/</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Bilderberg== | ||
| + | {{FA|Bilderberg}} | ||
| + | In 2011 the BBC published an article by [[Tom de Castella]] entitled ''Bilderberg mystery: Why do people believe in cabals?'', subtly reframing the "mystery" of the [[Bilderberg group]] away from substantial matters such as what the group does, towards why people are interested in it. The article quoted journalist [[David Aaronovitch]] as stating that the [[Bilderberg]] is "really an occasional supper club for the rich and powerful".<ref>http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-13682082</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Calais Jungle== | ||
| + | {{FA|BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==COVID-19== | ||
| + | {{To be added to}} | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| − | {{ | + | |
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{Reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 27 November 2021
 | |
| Date | 18 October 1922 - Present |
|---|---|
| Perpetrators | UK/Deep state |
| Description | The BBC has been a tool of the UK deep state since its foundation in 1922. |
Contents
Official narrative
The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm...
September 11, 2001
Rather than investigate how the BBC evidenced foreknowledge of the destruction of WTC7, or why in 2007, Richard Porter, a BBC Senior Editor incorrectly claimed that the BBC "no longer ha[d] the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage"[1], the BBC instead produced three episodes of Conspiracy Files about the events of that day.
Dr Rola
- Full article: Dr Rola
- Full article: Dr Rola
In 2011, the BBC broadcast the highly suspicious "Dr Rola" report. This 'unverified' footage appeared calculated to provoke pro-war sentiment; purporting as it did to show the aftermath of a Syrian napalm/chemical weapon attack on a school. The report certainly contained a doctored soundtrack (the BBC have admitted as much) and may even have been a complete fake. The event has been compared to the infamous Nurse Nayirah footage (for which, also, no one has been brought to book).[2]
Robert Stuart inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."[3]
Bilderberg
- Full article:
Bilderberg
- Full article:
In 2011 the BBC published an article by Tom de Castella entitled Bilderberg mystery: Why do people believe in cabals?, subtly reframing the "mystery" of the Bilderberg group away from substantial matters such as what the group does, towards why people are interested in it. The article quoted journalist David Aaronovitch as stating that the Bilderberg is "really an occasional supper club for the rich and powerful".[4]
Calais Jungle
- Full article: BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle
- Full article: BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle
COVID-19
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle | Coverage of the European migrant crisis from the BBC. |
| Conspiracy Files | A series of programmes, each of which focuses on a particular "Conspiracy theories". |
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Cook | “It looks suspiciously like one scene in particular, of people with horrific burns, was staged.” | Jonathan Cook | 8 March 2017 |
| Craig Murray | “This video of Robert Stuart is a must see. Let me pin my colours to the mast and say that I am absolutely convinced that the BBC did deliberately and knowingly fake evidence of chemical attacks.” | Craig Murray | 9 March 2016 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:BBC Bombast | article | 11 July 2011 | David Cromwell | An authoritative run-down on BBC News as a model propaganda mouthpiece for the dominant establishment narrative of UK foreign policy initiatives and involvements abroad. The article provides startling chapter and verse on a number of recent examples |
| Document:Is Fukushima's nuclear nightmare over? Don’t count on it | article | 12 March 2016 | Chris Busby | Update on the developing Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear disaster and a good illustration of BBC use of "Experts" to present and give credibility to outrageous falsehoods in support of the "nothing to see here" propaganda of the nuclear industry. |
