Difference between revisions of "BBC/Propaganda"

From Wikispooks
< BBC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(robert stuart's research)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{event
 
{{event
 
|constitutes=propaganda
 
|constitutes=propaganda
|perpetrators=deep state
+
|perpetrators=UK/Deep state
 
|image=BBC_Propaganda.jpg
 
|image=BBC_Propaganda.jpg
 +
|start=18 October 1922
 +
|description=The BBC has been a tool of the [[UK deep state]] since its foundation in 1922.
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
 
The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm...
 
The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm...
 +
 +
==September 11, 2001==
 +
Rather than investigate how the BBC evidenced [[foreknowledge of the destruction of WTC7]], or why in 2007, Richard Porter, a BBC Senior Editor incorrectly claimed that the BBC "no longer ha[d] the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage"<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html</ref>, the BBC instead produced three episodes of ''[[Conspiracy Files]]'' about the events of that day.
  
 
==Dr Rola==
 
==Dr Rola==
Line 12: Line 17:
  
 
[[Robert Stuart]] inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."<ref>https://bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/2015/07/22/bbc-upholds-complaint-re-substitution-of-napalm-bomb-footage/</ref>
 
[[Robert Stuart]] inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."<ref>https://bbcpanoramasavingsyriaschildren.wordpress.com/2015/07/22/bbc-upholds-complaint-re-substitution-of-napalm-bomb-footage/</ref>
 +
 +
==Bilderberg==
 +
{{FA|Bilderberg}}
 +
In 2011 the BBC published an article by [[Tom de Castella]] entitled ''Bilderberg mystery: Why do people believe in cabals?'', subtly reframing the "mystery" of the [[Bilderberg group]] away from substantial matters such as what the group does, towards why people are interested in it. The article quoted journalist [[David Aaronovitch]] as stating that the [[Bilderberg]] is "really an occasional supper club for the rich and powerful".<ref>http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-13682082</ref>
 +
 +
==Calais Jungle==
 +
{{FA|BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle}}
 +
 +
==COVID-19==
 +
{{To be added to}}
 +
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
{{Stub}}
+
 
 +
==References==
 +
{{Reflist}}

Latest revision as of 22:02, 27 November 2021

Event.png BBC/Propaganda(propaganda) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
BBC Propaganda.jpg
Date18 October 1922 - Present
PerpetratorsUK/Deep state
DescriptionThe BBC has been a tool of the UK deep state since its foundation in 1922.

Official narrative

The BBC attempts to achieve best results for its license payers. Hmmm...

September 11, 2001

Rather than investigate how the BBC evidenced foreknowledge of the destruction of WTC7, or why in 2007, Richard Porter, a BBC Senior Editor incorrectly claimed that the BBC "no longer ha[d] the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage"[1], the BBC instead produced three episodes of Conspiracy Files about the events of that day.

Dr Rola

Full article: Dr Rola

In 2011, the BBC broadcast the highly suspicious "Dr Rola" report. This 'unverified' footage appeared calculated to provoke pro-war sentiment; purporting as it did to show the aftermath of a Syrian napalm/chemical weapon attack on a school. The report certainly contained a doctored soundtrack (the BBC have admitted as much) and may even have been a complete fake. The event has been compared to the infamous Nurse Nayirah footage (for which, also, no one has been brought to book).[2]

Robert Stuart inquired about video editing and was told in 2015 that "there is no formal policy which obliges BBC News to inform viewers that footage has been changed or to confirm when asked the source of material used."[3]

Bilderberg

Full article: Rated 4/5 Bilderberg

In 2011 the BBC published an article by Tom de Castella entitled Bilderberg mystery: Why do people believe in cabals?, subtly reframing the "mystery" of the Bilderberg group away from substantial matters such as what the group does, towards why people are interested in it. The article quoted journalist David Aaronovitch as stating that the Bilderberg is "really an occasional supper club for the rich and powerful".[4]

Calais Jungle

Full article: BBC coverage of the Calais Jungle

COVID-19

Template:To be added to


 

Examples

Page nameDescription
BBC coverage of the Calais JungleCoverage of the European migrant crisis from the BBC.
Conspiracy FilesA series of programmes, each of which focuses on a particular "Conspiracy theories".

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Jonathan Cook“It looks suspiciously like one scene in particular, of people with horrific burns, was staged.”Jonathan Cook8 March 2017
Craig Murray“This video of Robert Stuart is a must see. Let me pin my colours to the mast and say that I am absolutely convinced that the BBC did deliberately and knowingly fake evidence of chemical attacks.”Craig Murray9 March 2016

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:BBC Bombastarticle11 July 2011David CromwellAn authoritative run-down on BBC News as a model propaganda mouthpiece for the dominant establishment narrative of UK foreign policy initiatives and involvements abroad. The article provides startling chapter and verse on a number of recent examples
Document:Is Fukushima's nuclear nightmare over? Don’t count on itarticle12 March 2016Chris BusbyUpdate on the developing Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear disaster and a good illustration of BBC use of "Experts" to present and give credibility to outrageous falsehoods in support of the "nothing to see here" propaganda of the nuclear industry.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References