Difference between revisions of "MacBride Principles"
(Importing from WP and expanding) |
m (tidy references,description) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Concept | {{Concept | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBride_Principles | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBride_Principles | ||
− | |image= | + | |image=The_MacBride_Principles.jpg |
− | |image_width= | + | |image_width=240px |
− | |image_caption=[[Kevin McNamara]]'s 2010 book | + | |image_caption=Dr [[Kevin McNamara]]'s 2010 book |
+ | |description=Affirmative action proposals for Northern Ireland. | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | Drafted by [[Seán MacBride]] and published by the [http://www.irishnationalcaucus.org/ Irish National Caucus] (INC) in November 1984, the '''MacBride Principles''' contained nine affirmative action proposals aimed at eliminating religious discrimination in the employment practices of [[United States]] corporations with subsidiaries in [[Northern Ireland]]. The weapon used by the MacBride campaigners was the US federal constitution. | |
− | Supported by the United States government, there was a fierce reaction by the British government to the Principles. Its attempts to suppress them were unsuccessful. Using interviews with key personalities involved and hitherto unpublished and inaccessible archives of the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, and papers obtained using the [[FOIA|Freedom of Information Acts]] of the United States and the [[United Kingdom]], the evolution of the McBride Campaign | + | States and cities in the Union could pass their own corporate legislation incorporating the MacBride Principles and use their pension fund investments to table shareholder resolutions seeking the Principles' inclusion in employment policies. Later developments saw their application to US and foreign firms supplying goods and services to states and cities. Using devolved legislation, the MacBride campaign broke the stranglehold on the discussion of Irish issues maintained by the US, UK and Irish governments in the Congress. It was debated in state legislatures and city councils. Irish-America was motivated to participate in a nonviolent campaign to achieve social justice in Northern Ireland.<ref>''[http://www.irishnationalcaucus.org/principle/the-macbride-principles-the-essence/ "The MacBride Principles – The Essence"]''</ref> |
+ | |||
+ | Supported by the United States government, there was a fierce reaction by the British government to the MacBride Principles. Its attempts to suppress them were unsuccessful. Using interviews with key personalities involved and hitherto unpublished and inaccessible archives of the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, and papers obtained using the [[FOIA|Freedom of Information Acts]] of the United States and the [[United Kingdom]], the evolution of the McBride Campaign was mapped out in full in a 2010 book by [[Kevin McNamara]], who brought particular insight through his role as a British [[Member of Parliament]] and former [[Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland]].<ref>''[https://www.amazon.com/Macbride-Principles-Irish-America-Strikes/dp/1846312175 "The Macbride Principles: Irish America Strikes Back"]''</ref> | ||
==Nine MacBride Principles== | ==Nine MacBride Principles== | ||
− | The nine MacBride Principles were promoted by Irish priest Seán McManus and the | + | The nine MacBride Principles were promoted by Irish priest Seán McManus and the Irish National Caucus, and by John Finucanne and the American Irish Political Education Committee (PEC), and were drafted by [[Nobel Peace Prize|Nobel Laureate]] [[Seán MacBride]] (a founding member of [[Amnesty International]]): |
#Increasing the representation of individuals from under-represented religious groups in the workforce including managerial, supervisory, administrative, clerical and technical jobs. | #Increasing the representation of individuals from under-represented religious groups in the workforce including managerial, supervisory, administrative, clerical and technical jobs. | ||
#Adequate security for the protection of minority employees both at the workplace and while travelling to and from work. | #Adequate security for the protection of minority employees both at the workplace and while travelling to and from work. | ||
Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
#The appointment of a senior management staff member to oversee the company's affirmative action efforts and the setting up of timetables to carry out affirmative action principles.<ref>''[http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/macbride.html "Launch date link accessed August 2009"]''</ref> | #The appointment of a senior management staff member to oversee the company's affirmative action efforts and the setting up of timetables to carry out affirmative action principles.<ref>''[http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/macbride.html "Launch date link accessed August 2009"]''</ref> | ||
− | In addition to the above, each signatory to the principles | + | In addition to the above, each signatory to the principles was required to report annually to an independent monitoring agency on progress in their implementation. |
− | + | The [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government regarded the MacBride Principles as unrealistic and impracticable, such as protection of employees on their way to and from work, and perceived them as throttling foreign investment in Northern Ireland and increasing the economic problems of the province.<ref>Cowley, Martin, ''"Hume Attacks SF Cynicism on MacBride Principles"'', Irish Times, 24. 9. 1987, p. 7.</ref> | |
− | There was acceptance, but also a lack of great enthusiasm, by both the Government of the [[Republic of Ireland]], and by moderate nationalists in Northern Ireland, amongst them the [[Social Democratic and Labour Party]] (SDLP), as the | + | There was acceptance, but also a lack of great enthusiasm, by both the Government of the [[Republic of Ireland]], and by moderate nationalists in Northern Ireland, amongst them the [[Social Democratic and Labour Party]] (SDLP), as the MacBride Principles chimed with developing European labour law provisions. In 1987 the then Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs, [[Brian Lenihan]] was quoted as follows regarding the McBride Principles: |
− | :“The Government's policy is to press for action by the British Government on measures in the short and medium term aimed at promoting equality of opportunity…”. He later wrote in 1989 “The Government's view is that there is nothing objectionable in the MacBride | + | :“The Government's policy is to press for action by the British Government on measures in the short and medium term aimed at promoting equality of opportunity…”. He later wrote in 1989 “The Government's view is that there is nothing objectionable in the MacBride Principles”.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20110609195446/http://www.oireachtas-debates.gov.ie/D/0372/D.0372.198705070027.html</ref> |
==Parallel British reforms== | ==Parallel British reforms== | ||
− | Within Northern Ireland itself, reforms had begun after the | + | Within Northern Ireland itself, reforms had begun after the [[Edward Heath|Heath]] government suspended the Parliament of Northern Ireland in March 1972 and had proceeded to the [[Jim Callaghan|Callaghan]] government's Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1976.<ref>''[http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/hmso/fea1976.htm "Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1976"]''</ref> This was amended by the [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] government in 1989.<ref>''[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/32/contents "Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1989"]''</ref> In 1999 the Fair Employment and Treatment Order 1998 became law under the [[Tony Blair|Blair]] government. |
− | Since then complaints are handled by the Fair Employment Commission for Northern Ireland, now a part of the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland, a non-governmental but publicly funded agency. The MacBride Principles certainly speeded the reform process in the 1980s, but it is debatable whether they contributed significantly after 1989. In a 2003 report the Irish National Caucus felt that the reforms had not yet achieved complete parity, emphasising that Northern Irish Catholics were still more likely to be unemployed and | + | Since then complaints are handled by the Fair Employment Commission for Northern Ireland, now a part of the [[Equality Commission for Northern Ireland]], a non-governmental but publicly funded agency. The MacBride Principles certainly speeded the reform process in the 1980s, but it is debatable whether they contributed significantly after 1989. In a 2003 report the Irish National Caucus felt that the reforms had not yet achieved complete parity, emphasising that Northern Irish Catholics were still more likely to be unemployed and under-educated, and less likely to work in managerial positions, than other groups, and calling for affirmative action policies.<ref>''[https://web.archive.org/web/20060519075847/http://www.irishnationalcaucus.org/pages/MacBride/IRRC%20Report%20on%20Fair%20Employment%20January%202003.htm "Fair Employment in Northern Ireland - INC report 2003"]''</ref> |
==Campaign== | ==Campaign== | ||
− | The MacBride | + | The MacBride Principles campaign was conducted on a three-fold level: |
− | + | 1. Federal - The MacBride Principles became the law of the United States in October 1998. The US House and Senate passed the MacBride Principles — as part of the "Omnibus Appropriations Act" for Fiscal Year 1999 — and [[Bill Clinton|President Clinton]] signed them into law. The MacBride law mandates that recipients of US contributions to the [[International Fund for Ireland]] (IFI) must be in compliance with the MacBride Principles. (The US has been contributing about $19.6 million per year since 1986 to the IFI.) | |
− | + | 2. State and Cities - Millions of dollars in state and city pension funds are invested in American corporations doing business in Northern Ireland. The MacBride Principles campaign lobbies to have legislation passed to direct these funds to be invested, in the future, only in companies that endorse the Principles (again, note, not divestment or disinvestments). This is the first step. The second step — once the MacBride Principles investment law has been passed — is to lobby cities and states to enact a "selective purchasing" law, barring the state or city from purchasing goods or services from companies in Northern Ireland that have not endorsed the Principles. | |
− | + | ||
+ | 3. Shareholder resolutions - The campaign works to have shareholders introduce and pass resolutions asking companies to endorse the MacBride Principles. | ||
==Endorsement== | ==Endorsement== | ||
Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
* some American Roman Catholic bishops | * some American Roman Catholic bishops | ||
* Virtually all Irish-American organisations. | * Virtually all Irish-American organisations. | ||
− | + | {{SMWDocs}} | |
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 8 August 2021
MacBride Principles | |
---|---|
Dr Kevin McNamara's 2010 book | |
Affirmative action proposals for Northern Ireland. |
Drafted by Seán MacBride and published by the Irish National Caucus (INC) in November 1984, the MacBride Principles contained nine affirmative action proposals aimed at eliminating religious discrimination in the employment practices of United States corporations with subsidiaries in Northern Ireland. The weapon used by the MacBride campaigners was the US federal constitution.
States and cities in the Union could pass their own corporate legislation incorporating the MacBride Principles and use their pension fund investments to table shareholder resolutions seeking the Principles' inclusion in employment policies. Later developments saw their application to US and foreign firms supplying goods and services to states and cities. Using devolved legislation, the MacBride campaign broke the stranglehold on the discussion of Irish issues maintained by the US, UK and Irish governments in the Congress. It was debated in state legislatures and city councils. Irish-America was motivated to participate in a nonviolent campaign to achieve social justice in Northern Ireland.[1]
Supported by the United States government, there was a fierce reaction by the British government to the MacBride Principles. Its attempts to suppress them were unsuccessful. Using interviews with key personalities involved and hitherto unpublished and inaccessible archives of the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, and papers obtained using the Freedom of Information Acts of the United States and the United Kingdom, the evolution of the McBride Campaign was mapped out in full in a 2010 book by Kevin McNamara, who brought particular insight through his role as a British Member of Parliament and former Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.[2]
Contents
Nine MacBride Principles
The nine MacBride Principles were promoted by Irish priest Seán McManus and the Irish National Caucus, and by John Finucanne and the American Irish Political Education Committee (PEC), and were drafted by Nobel Laureate Seán MacBride (a founding member of Amnesty International):
- Increasing the representation of individuals from under-represented religious groups in the workforce including managerial, supervisory, administrative, clerical and technical jobs.
- Adequate security for the protection of minority employees both at the workplace and while travelling to and from work.
- The banning of provocative religious or political emblems at the workplace.
- All job openings should be publicly advertised and special recruitment efforts should be made to attract applicants from under-represented religious groups.
- Lay-off, recall, and termination procedures should not in practice favour particular religious groupings.
- The abolition of job reservations, apprenticeship restrictions and differential employment criteria, which discriminate on the basis of religious or ethnic origin.
- The development of training programmes that will prepare substantial numbers of current minority employees for skilled jobs, including the expansion of existing programmes and the creation of new programmes to train, upgrade, and improve the skills of minority employees.
- The establishment of procedures to assess, identify, and actively recruit minority employees with the potential for further advancement.
- The appointment of a senior management staff member to oversee the company's affirmative action efforts and the setting up of timetables to carry out affirmative action principles.[3]
In addition to the above, each signatory to the principles was required to report annually to an independent monitoring agency on progress in their implementation.
The Thatcher government regarded the MacBride Principles as unrealistic and impracticable, such as protection of employees on their way to and from work, and perceived them as throttling foreign investment in Northern Ireland and increasing the economic problems of the province.[4]
There was acceptance, but also a lack of great enthusiasm, by both the Government of the Republic of Ireland, and by moderate nationalists in Northern Ireland, amongst them the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP), as the MacBride Principles chimed with developing European labour law provisions. In 1987 the then Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Brian Lenihan was quoted as follows regarding the McBride Principles:
- “The Government's policy is to press for action by the British Government on measures in the short and medium term aimed at promoting equality of opportunity…”. He later wrote in 1989 “The Government's view is that there is nothing objectionable in the MacBride Principles”.[5]
Parallel British reforms
Within Northern Ireland itself, reforms had begun after the Heath government suspended the Parliament of Northern Ireland in March 1972 and had proceeded to the Callaghan government's Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1976.[6] This was amended by the Thatcher government in 1989.[7] In 1999 the Fair Employment and Treatment Order 1998 became law under the Blair government.
Since then complaints are handled by the Fair Employment Commission for Northern Ireland, now a part of the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland, a non-governmental but publicly funded agency. The MacBride Principles certainly speeded the reform process in the 1980s, but it is debatable whether they contributed significantly after 1989. In a 2003 report the Irish National Caucus felt that the reforms had not yet achieved complete parity, emphasising that Northern Irish Catholics were still more likely to be unemployed and under-educated, and less likely to work in managerial positions, than other groups, and calling for affirmative action policies.[8]
Campaign
The MacBride Principles campaign was conducted on a three-fold level:
1. Federal - The MacBride Principles became the law of the United States in October 1998. The US House and Senate passed the MacBride Principles — as part of the "Omnibus Appropriations Act" for Fiscal Year 1999 — and President Clinton signed them into law. The MacBride law mandates that recipients of US contributions to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) must be in compliance with the MacBride Principles. (The US has been contributing about $19.6 million per year since 1986 to the IFI.)
2. State and Cities - Millions of dollars in state and city pension funds are invested in American corporations doing business in Northern Ireland. The MacBride Principles campaign lobbies to have legislation passed to direct these funds to be invested, in the future, only in companies that endorse the Principles (again, note, not divestment or disinvestments). This is the first step. The second step — once the MacBride Principles investment law has been passed — is to lobby cities and states to enact a "selective purchasing" law, barring the state or city from purchasing goods or services from companies in Northern Ireland that have not endorsed the Principles.
3. Shareholder resolutions - The campaign works to have shareholders introduce and pass resolutions asking companies to endorse the MacBride Principles.
Endorsement
The MacBride Principles have been passed in the following 18 US states:
Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont and California.
They have also been passed or endorsed by over 40 cities, and are pending in many more. The following organisations or individuals have also endorsed them:
- American Irish Political Education Committee
- The Reverend Jesse Jackson
- Randall Robinson of TransAfrica, the group that sponsored Nelson Mandela's visit to the United States
- Former New York State Governor George Pataki
- Former New York State Governor Mario Cuomo
- Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
- Former New York City Mayor David Dinkins
- Former Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn (and former Ambassador to the Vatican)
- The AFL-CIO
- The National Council of Churches
- The American Baptist Convention
- The Episcopal Church
- The Lutheran Pension Board
- The United Church of Christ Board of World Ministries
- The United Methodist Church
- some American Roman Catholic bishops
- Virtually all Irish-American organisations.
Related Document
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Has the media ignored good news about Jeremy Corbyn | Blog post | 11 December 2017 | Patrick Worrall | No-platforming Jeremy Corbyn: Tories and Unionists have a visceral hate of Seán MacBride |
References
- ↑ "The MacBride Principles – The Essence"
- ↑ "The Macbride Principles: Irish America Strikes Back"
- ↑ "Launch date link accessed August 2009"
- ↑ Cowley, Martin, "Hume Attacks SF Cynicism on MacBride Principles", Irish Times, 24. 9. 1987, p. 7.
- ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20110609195446/http://www.oireachtas-debates.gov.ie/D/0372/D.0372.198705070027.html
- ↑ "Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1976"
- ↑ "Fair Employment (Northern Ireland) Act 1989"
- ↑ "Fair Employment in Northern Ireland - INC report 2003"
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here