Difference between revisions of "IPSO"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 266 November 2021.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
(Importing from WP and expanding) |
m (Text replacement - "mainstream media" to "corporate media") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Press_Standards_Organisation | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Press_Standards_Organisation | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | The '''Independent Press Standards Organisation''' ('''IPSO''') is not recognised by the [[Press Recognition Panel]] (PRP) but the majority of [[ | + | The '''Independent Press Standards Organisation''' ('''IPSO''') is not recognised by the [[Press Recognition Panel]] (PRP) but the majority of [[corporate media]] industry in the [[UK]] agree to be regulated by IPSO. It was established on 8 September 2014 after the windup of the [[Press Complaints Commission]] (PCC), which had been the main industry regulator of the press in the [[United Kingdom]] since 1990. |
IPSO exists to promote and uphold the highest professional standards of journalism, and to support members of the public in seeking redress where they believe that the Editors' Code of Practice has been breached. However, IPSO's effectiveness is questioned by some critics, including [[Hacked Off]], and it has been called a "pointless so-called regulator" by the [[National Union of Journalists]] (NUJ).<ref>''[https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/apr/29/nuj-backs-impress-calling-ipso-a-pointless-so-called-regulator "NUJ backs Impress, calling Ipso a 'pointless so-called regulator'"]''</ref> | IPSO exists to promote and uphold the highest professional standards of journalism, and to support members of the public in seeking redress where they believe that the Editors' Code of Practice has been breached. However, IPSO's effectiveness is questioned by some critics, including [[Hacked Off]], and it has been called a "pointless so-called regulator" by the [[National Union of Journalists]] (NUJ).<ref>''[https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/apr/29/nuj-backs-impress-calling-ipso-a-pointless-so-called-regulator "NUJ backs Impress, calling Ipso a 'pointless so-called regulator'"]''</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:39, 14 December 2023
 IPSO    | |
|---|---|
The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) is not recognised by the Press Recognition Panel (PRP) but the majority of corporate media industry in the UK agree to be regulated by IPSO. It was established on 8 September 2014 after the windup of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), which had been the main industry regulator of the press in the United Kingdom since 1990.
IPSO exists to promote and uphold the highest professional standards of journalism, and to support members of the public in seeking redress where they believe that the Editors' Code of Practice has been breached. However, IPSO's effectiveness is questioned by some critics, including Hacked Off, and it has been called a "pointless so-called regulator" by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ).[1]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:IMPRESS dismisses Mann's smears of antisemitism against Skwawkbox and The Canary | Article | 25 November 2021 | Steve Walker | Mr Mann, or Lord Mann as he likes to be called according to his Twitter handle, has a long record of enmity toward Skwawkbox and the left media, which have highlighted his own actions and his own displays of contempt toward Gypsy Roma and Traveller people, which caused them deep hurt and even led to him being interviewed by police. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 266 November 2021.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
