Difference between revisions of "Nuclear Posture Review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 8 February 2018.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
m |
(Author link in ref) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|image_caption=New [[Trump Nuclear Doctrine]] | |image_caption=New [[Trump Nuclear Doctrine]] | ||
|sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Nuclear_Posture_Review | |sourcewatch=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Nuclear_Posture_Review | ||
| + | |description=Upgrade of nuclear weapons | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | The '''Nuclear Posture Review''' | + | The '''Nuclear Posture Review''' is a process “to determine what the role of nuclear weapons in [[United States]] security strategy should be.”<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20090806232307/http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr95/npr_.html</ref> |
In his first year in office, President [[Barack Obama]] gave a landmark address in Prague in which he famously affirmed “clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” The commitment to total nuclear disarmament was a major departure from the [[George W. Bush]] administration — the first time, in fact, that the United States had declared a nuclear-free world a major policy goal. | In his first year in office, President [[Barack Obama]] gave a landmark address in Prague in which he famously affirmed “clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” The commitment to total nuclear disarmament was a major departure from the [[George W. Bush]] administration — the first time, in fact, that the United States had declared a nuclear-free world a major policy goal. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
| − | The first NPR of 2002 was the second of these quadrennial reviews of United States nuclear forces undertaken by the [[United States Department of Defense]]. The first took place in 1994. The final report is National Security ''Classified'' and submitted to the [[US Congress]].<ref> | + | The first NPR of 2002 was the second of these quadrennial reviews of United States nuclear forces undertaken by the [[United States Department of Defense]]. The first took place in 1994. The final report is National Security ''Classified'' and submitted to the [[US Congress]].<ref>http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/statement-president-barack-obama-release-nuclear-posture-review </ref> |
| − | The 2002 Nuclear Posture Review also included components requiring the "Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only [[Russia]] and the "Axis of Evil" — [[Iraq]], [[Iran]], and [[North Korea]] — but also [[China]], [[Libya]] and [[Syria]]."<ref> | + | The 2002 Nuclear Posture Review also included components requiring the "Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only [[Russia]] and the "Axis of Evil" — [[Iraq]], [[Iran]], and [[North Korea]] — but also [[China]], [[Libya]] and [[Syria]]."<ref>[[William Arkin]] : “[https://web.archive.org/web/20020315070751/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-arkinmar10.story Secret Plan Outlines the Unthinkable]” - ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' of 10 March 2002 (via [[Internet Archive]])</ref> |
===Reducing the nuclear stockpile=== | ===Reducing the nuclear stockpile=== | ||
| − | President [[Barack Obama]]'s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review was preceded by high expectations because of his 2009 speech in Prague, [[Czech Republic]] where he prominently outlined a vision of a world without nuclear weapons. His NPR was hoped by observers to make concrete moves toward this goal.<ref> | + | President [[Barack Obama]]'s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review was preceded by high expectations because of his 2009 speech in Prague, [[Czech Republic]] where he prominently outlined a vision of a world without nuclear weapons. His NPR was hoped by observers to make concrete moves toward this goal.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/us/politics/01nuke.html</ref> The finished 2010 policy<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/05/AR2010030502260.html</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/04/06/GR2010040604804.html</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040601369.html</ref> renounces development of any new nuclear weapons such as the bunker-busters proposed by the Bush administration, and for the first time rules out a nuclear attack against non-nuclear-weapon states who are in compliance with the [[Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty]]. This rule pointedly excludes [[Iran]] and [[North Korea]].<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8604217.stm</ref><ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html</ref><ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/07arms.html</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | As part of the implementation of the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, the U.S. Government is reviewing its nuclear deterrence requirements and nuclear plans to ensure that they are aligned to address today's threats. [[Rose Gottemoeller]], US Acting Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, said in early June 2012 that the United States was considering what forces the United States needed to maintain for strategic stability and deterrence, including extended deterrence and assurance to US allies and partners. Based on this analysis the United States would develop proposals for potential further reductions in its nuclear stockpile.<ref> | + | As part of the implementation of the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, the U.S. Government is reviewing its nuclear deterrence requirements and nuclear plans to ensure that they are aligned to address today's threats. [[Rose Gottemoeller]], US Acting Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, said in early June 2012 that the United States was considering what forces the United States needed to maintain for strategic stability and deterrence, including extended deterrence and assurance to US allies and partners. Based on this analysis the United States would develop proposals for potential further reductions in its nuclear stockpile.<ref>http://www.rttnews.com/1899925/us-not-developing-new-nuclear-weapons-no-new-nuclear-missions.aspx?type=usp</ref> |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:40, 1 September 2022
 Nuclear Posture Review     | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Upgrade of nuclear weapons |
The Nuclear Posture Review is a process “to determine what the role of nuclear weapons in United States security strategy should be.”[1]
In his first year in office, President Barack Obama gave a landmark address in Prague in which he famously affirmed “clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.” The commitment to total nuclear disarmament was a major departure from the George W. Bush administration — the first time, in fact, that the United States had declared a nuclear-free world a major policy goal.
Now, eight years later, it’s the Trump administration’s turn to lay out its nuclear weapons policy. And according to a pre-decisional draft of the 2018 NPR obtained by the Huffington Post, Trump’s Department of Defense has gone a decidedly different route: new nukes, for no good reason:[2]
- "The new US nuclear posture is a reckless, irresponsible, and destabilising departure from the previous attitude toward nuclear weapons. The use of even a small part of the existing arsenal of the United States would be sufficient to destroy life on earth. Yet, the posture review calls for more weapons, speaks of nuclear weapons as 'usable', and justifies their use in 'First Strikes' even against countries that do not have nuclear weapons."[3]
Contents
History
The first NPR of 2002 was the second of these quadrennial reviews of United States nuclear forces undertaken by the United States Department of Defense. The first took place in 1994. The final report is National Security Classified and submitted to the US Congress.[4]
The 2002 Nuclear Posture Review also included components requiring the "Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only Russia and the "Axis of Evil" — Iraq, Iran, and North Korea — but also China, Libya and Syria."[5]
Reducing the nuclear stockpile
President Barack Obama's 2010 Nuclear Posture Review was preceded by high expectations because of his 2009 speech in Prague, Czech Republic where he prominently outlined a vision of a world without nuclear weapons. His NPR was hoped by observers to make concrete moves toward this goal.[6] The finished 2010 policy[7][8][9] renounces development of any new nuclear weapons such as the bunker-busters proposed by the Bush administration, and for the first time rules out a nuclear attack against non-nuclear-weapon states who are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This rule pointedly excludes Iran and North Korea.[10][11][12]
As part of the implementation of the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, the U.S. Government is reviewing its nuclear deterrence requirements and nuclear plans to ensure that they are aligned to address today's threats. Rose Gottemoeller, US Acting Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, said in early June 2012 that the United States was considering what forces the United States needed to maintain for strategic stability and deterrence, including extended deterrence and assurance to US allies and partners. Based on this analysis the United States would develop proposals for potential further reductions in its nuclear stockpile.[13]
External links
- The official 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
- The unclassified briefing
- Nuclear Posture Review Report a leak of Excerpts from the report, 8 January 2002
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Speech to the European Parliament by Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of ICAN | Speech | 7 February 2018 | Beatrice Fihn | "Are you going to support the new Trump Nuclear Doctrine? Join the thinking of Russia, North Korea? Cheer on a new nuclear arms race? Or are you going to support the work for the prohibition and the elimination of nuclear weapons? You cannot do both." |
| Document:US Nuclear Policy Review: The World Is Our Enemy | Article | 8 February 2018 | Christopher Black | “We (the United States) will keep you guessing as to when and against whom we will use them (nuclear weapons). We will maintain our role as the greatest state terrorist by keeping the nuclear Damocles sword over the heads of the people of the world constantly to ensure that the world acts in our interest.” |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20090806232307/http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr95/npr_.html
- ↑ "Exclusive: Here Is A Draft Of Trump’s Nuclear Review. He Wants A Lot More Nukes."
- ↑ "The Nuclear Posture Review: The World Will Not Survive the American Neoconservatives’ Doctrine of US World Hegemony"
- ↑ http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/statement-president-barack-obama-release-nuclear-posture-review
- ↑ William Arkin : “Secret Plan Outlines the Unthinkable” - Los Angeles Times of 10 March 2002 (via Internet Archive)
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/us/politics/01nuke.html
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/05/AR2010030502260.html
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/04/06/GR2010040604804.html
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040601369.html
- ↑ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8604217.stm
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/06arms.html
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/07arms.html
- ↑ http://www.rttnews.com/1899925/us-not-developing-new-nuclear-weapons-no-new-nuclear-missions.aspx?type=usp
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 8 February 2018.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
