Difference between revisions of "IPCC"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(link)
(Hockey stick graph)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
 
[[Vincent Richard Gray]], who was an "Expert Reviewer" for the IPCC,<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20100611050451/http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=155&Itemid=1</ref> called for the agency to be abolished; claiming it was “fundamentally corrupt” and that significant parts of the work of the IPCC (data collection, scientific methods employed) were unsound<ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.25-201351/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_R._Gray</ref><ref>http://archive.today/2013.12.09-222913/http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=55387187-4d06-446f-9f4f-c2397d155a32</ref> and that the IPCC resisted all efforts to try to discuss or rectify these problems.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2013/09/20/the-palpable-politicization-of-science-by-global-warming-alarmists/</ref>
 
[[Vincent Richard Gray]], who was an "Expert Reviewer" for the IPCC,<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20100611050451/http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=155&Itemid=1</ref> called for the agency to be abolished; claiming it was “fundamentally corrupt” and that significant parts of the work of the IPCC (data collection, scientific methods employed) were unsound<ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.25-201351/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_R._Gray</ref><ref>http://archive.today/2013.12.09-222913/http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=55387187-4d06-446f-9f4f-c2397d155a32</ref> and that the IPCC resisted all efforts to try to discuss or rectify these problems.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2013/09/20/the-palpable-politicization-of-science-by-global-warming-alarmists/</ref>
 
+
[[File:Ipcc hockey.jpg|thumb|480px|right|A rendering of IPCC's "[[Hockey stick graph]]".<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/feb/09/hockey-stick-graph-ipcc-report</ref>]]
 
{{SMWQ
 
{{SMWQ
 
|text='''The globe is warming because of increasing greenhouse gas emissions'''<p>''No evidence is presented to justify this conclusion. There are “projections” of computer models but these are not predictions, they are merely the results of assumptions made in the model. No “projected” result has ever been successfully related to an actual change in the climate.''
 
|text='''The globe is warming because of increasing greenhouse gas emissions'''<p>''No evidence is presented to justify this conclusion. There are “projections” of computer models but these are not predictions, they are merely the results of assumptions made in the model. No “projected” result has ever been successfully related to an actual change in the climate.''

Latest revision as of 20:02, 8 January 2022

Group.png IPCC   WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
AbbreviationIPCC
Formation1988
Parent organizationUN
Type Panel
Interests“climate change”

Not to be confused with the "Independent Police Complaints Commission", a now defunct group interested in complaints about the UK police.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is an intergovernmental body of the United Nations that is dedicated to providing information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of the risk of human-induced climate change.

Criticism

Vincent Richard Gray, who was an "Expert Reviewer" for the IPCC,[1] called for the agency to be abolished; claiming it was “fundamentally corrupt” and that significant parts of the work of the IPCC (data collection, scientific methods employed) were unsound[2][3] and that the IPCC resisted all efforts to try to discuss or rectify these problems.[4]

A rendering of IPCC's "Hockey stick graph".[5]

The globe is warming because of increasing greenhouse gas emissions

No evidence is presented to justify this conclusion. There are “projections” of computer models but these are not predictions, they are merely the results of assumptions made in the model. No “projected” result has ever been successfully related to an actual change in the climate.
Vincent Richard Gray [6]


 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Climategate its the heat source stupidCommentary
Document:People and Data Cherry-Picked For the IPCC Political Agendaarticle20 April 2014Tim BallA cogent critique of the UN IPCC personnel and methodology designed to suborn and harness science to a clearly political agenda. Written by a Doyen of climate science and author of the book "The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science".
File:Climategate-emails.pdfarticleMarch 2010John Costella
File:IPCC AR5 ZODS.zipreportJanuary 2011Unknown
New Climate Reality, New MediaArticle10 August 2021Mike SmallCall out the worst of columnists and publications spouting writing that is clearly against the common good and against humanity’s future. A weekly prize for the worst culprits. Naming and shaming disinformation and sponsored propaganda.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.