Difference between revisions of "Climate change/Preparation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Climate lockdowns) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Preparation for [[Climate change]]''' includes [[carbon taxes]] and certificates. | '''Preparation for [[Climate change]]''' includes [[carbon taxes]] and certificates. | ||
| − | "To understand the double-speak use of '''sustainable''', we need to go back to Maurice Strong, a billionaire Canadian oilman and close friend of David Rockefeller, the man who played a central role back in the 1970s for the idea that man-made CO2 emissions were making the world unsustainable. Strong created the UN Environment Program, and in 1988, the UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) to exclusively study manmade CO2." | + | "To understand the double-speak use of '''sustainable''', we need to go back to Maurice Strong, a billionaire Canadian oilman and close friend of David Rockefeller, the man who played a central role back in the 1970s for the idea that man-made CO2 emissions were making the world unsustainable. Strong created the UN Environment Program, and in 1988, the UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) to exclusively study manmade CO2."<ref>http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO9Jun2020.php</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ("sustainable" (i.e. [[sustainable development]]) is wording from [[Agenda 21]]) | ||
==A "sustainable" world?== | ==A "sustainable" world?== | ||
The outcome of [[carbon taxes]] is likely [[social control]] and freedom for the few, slavery and limited mobility for the many: | The outcome of [[carbon taxes]] is likely [[social control]] and freedom for the few, slavery and limited mobility for the many: | ||
| − | The decision to demonize CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, human and plant, is not random. As Prof. Richard Lindzen an MIT atmospheric physicist puts it, | + | "The decision to demonize CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, human and plant, is not random. As Prof. Richard Lindzen an MIT atmospheric physicist puts it, CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving – I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality."<ref>http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO9Jun2020.php</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ===Climate lockdowns=== | ||
| + | By mid 2020 the wording "[[climate lockdown]]" has been introduced;<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/is-a-climate-lockdown-next/</ref><ref>https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/02/06/here-come-the-climate-lockdowns-n1423647</ref> in early April 2020 a website dedicated to the topic, climatelockdown.com, has been registered.<ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.24-232008/https://whois.de/climatelockdown.com</ref><ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.23-215103/https://www.climatelockdown.com/</ref> In line with [[Bill Gates]] who published the headline: "''COVID-19 is awful. Climate change could be worse.''"<ref>https://www.gatesnotes.com/Energy/Climate-and-COVID-19</ref> and [[Deutsche Bank]], which in a strategy paper from November 2020 mentions that: ''"A certain degree of eco-dictatorship will be necessary"''.<ref>https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000513790/Climate_neutrality%3A_Are_we_ready_for_an_honest_dis.PDF</ref> | ||
===Population Reduction=== | ===Population Reduction=== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 25: | ||
Sir [[Richard Branson]] has frequently called for [[geoengineering]] to combat climate change. He helped fund the [[Royal Society]]'s inquiry into solar radiation management through his [[Carbon War Room]] "charity".<ref name=gu> | Sir [[Richard Branson]] has frequently called for [[geoengineering]] to combat climate change. He helped fund the [[Royal Society]]'s inquiry into solar radiation management through his [[Carbon War Room]] "charity".<ref name=gu> | ||
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering | ||
| − | </ref> | + | </ref> |
| + | |||
==Geo engineering lobby== | ==Geo engineering lobby== | ||
"There are clear conflicts of interest between many of the people involved in the debate," said [[Diana Bronson]], a researcher with Montreal-based [[geoengineering]] watchdog [[ETC]]. | "There are clear conflicts of interest between many of the people involved in the debate," said [[Diana Bronson]], a researcher with Montreal-based [[geoengineering]] watchdog [[ETC]]. | ||
| − | "What is really worrying is that the same small group working on high-risk technologies that will geoengineer the planet is also trying to engineer the discussion around international rules and regulations. We cannot put the fox in charge of the chicken coop." | + | "What is really worrying is that the same small group working on high-risk technologies that will geoengineer the planet is also trying to engineer the discussion around international rules and regulations. We cannot put the fox in charge of the chicken coop."<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering</ref> |
"The eco-clique are lobbying for a huge injection of [[public funds]] into [[geoengineering research]]. They dominate virtually every inquiry into geoengineering. They are present in almost all of the expert deliberations. They have been the leading advisers to parliamentary and congressional inquiries and their views will, in all likelihood, dominate the deliberations of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ([[IPCC]]) as it grapples for the first time with the scientific and ethical tangle that is climate engineering," said Clive Hamilton, professor of Public Ethics at the Australian National University, in a Guardian blog.<ref name=gu/> | "The eco-clique are lobbying for a huge injection of [[public funds]] into [[geoengineering research]]. They dominate virtually every inquiry into geoengineering. They are present in almost all of the expert deliberations. They have been the leading advisers to parliamentary and congressional inquiries and their views will, in all likelihood, dominate the deliberations of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ([[IPCC]]) as it grapples for the first time with the scientific and ethical tangle that is climate engineering," said Clive Hamilton, professor of Public Ethics at the Australian National University, in a Guardian blog.<ref name=gu/> | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 25 February 2021
 Climate change/Preparation(Disaster/Preparation)   | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Bill Gates |
Preparation for Climate change includes carbon taxes and certificates.
"To understand the double-speak use of sustainable, we need to go back to Maurice Strong, a billionaire Canadian oilman and close friend of David Rockefeller, the man who played a central role back in the 1970s for the idea that man-made CO2 emissions were making the world unsustainable. Strong created the UN Environment Program, and in 1988, the UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) to exclusively study manmade CO2."[1]
("sustainable" (i.e. sustainable development) is wording from Agenda 21)
Contents
A "sustainable" world?
The outcome of carbon taxes is likely social control and freedom for the few, slavery and limited mobility for the many:
"The decision to demonize CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, human and plant, is not random. As Prof. Richard Lindzen an MIT atmospheric physicist puts it, CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving – I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality."[2]
Climate lockdowns
By mid 2020 the wording "climate lockdown" has been introduced;[3][4] in early April 2020 a website dedicated to the topic, climatelockdown.com, has been registered.[5][6] In line with Bill Gates who published the headline: "COVID-19 is awful. Climate change could be worse."[7] and Deutsche Bank, which in a strategy paper from November 2020 mentions that: "A certain degree of eco-dictatorship will be necessary".[8]
Population Reduction
Antropologists from Cornell University [citation needed] have claimed that a decline in global temperature was the main cause for population reduction in past centuries and that the effect was stronger than any other known disaster. This might explain the deeper meaning of the term "sustainability" as understood by Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates and other deep state actors.
Carbon War Room
Sir Richard Branson has frequently called for geoengineering to combat climate change. He helped fund the Royal Society's inquiry into solar radiation management through his Carbon War Room "charity".[9]
Geo engineering lobby
"There are clear conflicts of interest between many of the people involved in the debate," said Diana Bronson, a researcher with Montreal-based geoengineering watchdog ETC.
"What is really worrying is that the same small group working on high-risk technologies that will geoengineer the planet is also trying to engineer the discussion around international rules and regulations. We cannot put the fox in charge of the chicken coop."[10]
"The eco-clique are lobbying for a huge injection of public funds into geoengineering research. They dominate virtually every inquiry into geoengineering. They are present in almost all of the expert deliberations. They have been the leading advisers to parliamentary and congressional inquiries and their views will, in all likelihood, dominate the deliberations of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as it grapples for the first time with the scientific and ethical tangle that is climate engineering," said Clive Hamilton, professor of Public Ethics at the Australian National University, in a Guardian blog.[9]
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Climategate | account of corrupt science practice |
| Food Chain Reaction | Set in the 2020 to 2030 period, the exercise focused on problems in the food supply due to population growth and severe weather, triggering social unrest. Held November 2015. ended with the implementation of a global carbon tax. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO9Jun2020.php
- ↑ http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO9Jun2020.php
- ↑ https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/is-a-climate-lockdown-next/
- ↑ https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/02/06/here-come-the-climate-lockdowns-n1423647
- ↑ http://archive.today/2021.02.24-232008/https://whois.de/climatelockdown.com
- ↑ http://archive.today/2021.02.23-215103/https://www.climatelockdown.com/
- ↑ https://www.gatesnotes.com/Energy/Climate-and-COVID-19
- ↑ https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000513790/Climate_neutrality%3A_Are_we_ready_for_an_honest_dis.PDF
- ↑ a b https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering
