9-11/Pentagon

 9-11/Pentagon

Date	2001-09-11
Perpetrators	9-11/Perpetrators
Description	The Pentagon was attacked on September 11th, allegedly by a plane, although insufficient evidence has been presented to prove this beyond reasonable doubt. A lot of CCTV footage of what happened has been confiscated by the US government and not released.

Official Narrative

Hijacker Hani Hanjour made a 270° corkscrew diving turn into the pentagon with American Airlines Flight 77, a 125 feet wide Boeing 757. This reached around 800 km/h and knocked down 5 light posts as it approached the Pentagon before crashing directly into the south face, creating a 16 feet wide hole. No CCTV footage of the event has been made available as it was confiscated by the FBI for reasons of "National security". After some delay, a single camera's footage was released, and although a fireball is visible, a 757 is not and the video is missing a frame.

Problems

Did a 757 really hit this building?

Rarely shown by the corporate media is a photo to the right of the initial impact on the pentagon before the roof collapse. Note that no airplane wreckage is shown on the lawn and the windows on the left side are still in shape where the plane's vertical stabilizer would have hit. It is aerodynamically impossible to fly a Boeing 757 at 20 feet above the ground for half a mile which the official narrative's south path approach requires.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, obtained data from the NTSB via the Freedom of Information Act that is allegedly derived from Flight 77′s Flight Data Recorder. Analysis of that data by Pilots for 9/11 Truth determined that the data contradicted the 9/11 Commission Report in several significant ways, the altitude of the aircraft would have been at least 300 feet too high to have struck the light poles.The altitude of the aircraft would have been at least 100 feet too high to have struck the Pentagon. In addition multiple credible witness reported a north side approach to the pentagon meaning it could not have hit the pentagon. Also closer witnesses reported that flight 77 flew over and past the pentagon. Taxi cab driver, Lloyde England, initially claimed that a silent stranger helped him remove the light pole from his car but later admitted to staging the downed light poles. Multiple witnesses and experts note that the damage appears to be more consistent with a cruise missile rather than a 757.

Many experienced professional pilots have expressed doubt that they could have manage the feasibility of the maneuver that Hanjour is alleged to have carried out. Moreover, he was known as a "terrible" pilot, and his flight instructor said he could not even handle a single-engine Cessna 172.

Missile damage to the Pentagon

A P-700 Granit Cruise Missile Sketch

The theory that a Missile is what caused the damage to the Pentagon is supported by many experts, including Dr. Janette Sherman, a well-respected radiation expert, who used a Geiger counter to measure radiation levels from about 12 miles downwind of the Pentagon shortly after the attack on 9/11. Sherman reported that the Geiger counter reading was extremely high, 8-10 times greater than normal. Indicating that a “depleted uranium warhead may have been used”.

Dimitri Khalezov a former soviet intelligence officer and whistleblower responsible for nuclear intelligence claims that a stolen soviet P-700 “Granit” missile equipped with a standard “Navy-type” 500 kiloton thermo-nuclear warhead was responsible for damage to the pentagon.

Quotes

“From my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon… The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn’t happen immediately, it wasn’t until almost about forty-five minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.” - Jamie Mcintyre, CNN

“a strange lack of visible debris on the Pentagon lawn, where I stood only moments after the impact. . . . I saw . . . no airplane metal or cargo debris.” Karen Kwiatkowski, U.S. Air Force

“When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.” - retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke PhD

“One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?”- Major General Albert Stubblebine

In an interview with Parade Magazine in October 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was asked “How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?” Rumsfeld replied:

“There were lots of warnings… It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”

In an interview in September 2006 with CNN’s Miles O’Brien, former 9/11 Commissioner member, Timothy Roemer, says that a missile caused the damage to the Pentagon and then quickly corrects himself to line up with the official story:

"Roemer: “There was — there were many times, Miles, that you were afraid. You were — you were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night, seeing one of our fortresses pried open by a missile, an airplane, thinking about the number of people that probably died on the plane and on the ground…”

Lon Rains, who was an Editor for Space News at the time, happened to be driving his car near the Pentagon when it was hit by a missile on 9/11. In an article titled Eyewitness: The Pentagon, published on June 30, 2005, Rains wrote:

“That morning, like many others, the traffic slowed to a crawl just in front of the Pentagon. With the Pentagon to the left of my van at about 10 o’clock on the dial of a clock, I glanced at my watch to see if I was going to be late for my appointment. At that moment I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound that began behind me and stopped suddenly in front of me and to my left. In fractions of a second I heard the impact and an explosion. The next thing I saw was the fireball. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane.”

“I’m not an explosives or crash site expert, but I am highly knowledgeable in causes and effects related to nuclear radiation contamination. What happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used.” -Dr. Leuren Moret former scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory

Target Selection

E.P. Heidner writes that "the Office of Naval Intelligence in the Pentagon, which sustained a direct hit that day, was without a doubt, a target that was pinpointed for destruction".

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had announced $2.3 trillion dollars missing on the day prior to 9/11. The budget analysis office at the pentagon which is responsible for investigation was hit on 9-11.

Building Condition?

The building was undergoing reinforcement at the time of the attack. User:Polaris97 writes:

A few days prior to the "9/11" event, the History Channel presented a show in which the Pentagon was a main focus. During the hour-long program, mild-tempered issues were raised related to the quickly deteriorating conditions plaguing the buildings’ structure—outmoded materials used in the initial construction now demanding renovations. However, the fear of astronomical costs for these renovations was put forth as a questionable deterrent for the American public: considering the age of the building (1941-2001), would the facility be relegated to sit as some type of museum and relic of a war-time era gone by, or would it receive the necessary attention to reclaim its glory and dominance over the global stage of military force and strategy? At the end of the program, while the credits were displayed, a narrator was making statements and asking questions about the uncertain fate of this American icon; among the rhetorical questions asked, the option of bomb-proof reinforcement was posited, considering the martial status the Pentagon represents.

Too many years after the event, I tried to acquire a screen-shot of the listing of programs scheduled on that day (most likely the 6th, a Thursday, but certainly before the weekend). However, the History Channel web site would not allow gleaning of the shows for that date. If anyone reading has further or more in-depth insights into this particular confluence, please share! In all of my years of “9/11” research, I have not heard a single statement from a television viewer or researcher in reference to this perspective, but it is certain that such persons are indeed out there. I mention this issue because as the spectacle unfolded, my immediate thoughts were continually revisiting the (now considerably strange) show I had watched recently. I do not know if this is a relevant piece of the puzzle, but it served as the catalytic issue for my continued interest in what happened that day.

 

Related Quotation

Page	Quote	Author
Norman Mineta	“I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant.”	Norman Mineta

 

Related Document

Title	Type	Publication date	Author(s)	Description
Document:Norad-911-Jochen Scholz	interview	30 January 2011	Jochen Scholz	Excerpted from a NuoViso interview with Lieutenant-Colonel Jochen Scholz of the German air force on 911 and the war on terror.

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.