Difference between revisions of "Great Barrington declaration"
(Created the page.) |
(general update) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|website=https://gbdeclaration.org/ | |website=https://gbdeclaration.org/ | ||
|image= | |image= | ||
− | | | + | |description=Open letter published in October [[2020]] during the [[Covid]] [[lockdowns]], calling for "targeted interventions to protect those most at risk". |
− | |constitutes=letter | + | |authors=Sunetra Gupta,Carl Heneghan,Karol Sikora,Sam Williams |
+ | |recipients=Boris Johnson,Rishi Sunak,Chris Whitty,Frank Atherton,Gregor Ian Smith,Michael McBride,Patrick Vallance | ||
+ | |constitutes=open letter | ||
|start=4 October 2020 | |start=4 October 2020 | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | The '''Great Barrington Declaration''' is an open letter by 25 "prominent scientists" published in October [[2020]] to protest against the [[Covid]] [[lockdowns]], but before the "[[Covid jab|vaccines]]" were rolled out. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Authors and signatories== | ||
+ | The declaration was initiated by Professor [[Sunetra Gupta]], Professor of theoretical epidemiology, the University of Oxford; Professor [[Carl Heneghan]]; Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, the University of Oxford; Professor [[Karol Sikora]]; Consultant oncologist and Professor of medicine, [[University of Buckingham]]; and [[Sam Williams]]; Director and co-founder of Economic Insight; and originally co-signed by 21 other scientists.<ref name=letter>[[Document:A targeted and evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 policy response (an open letter)]]</ref> The open letter was later signed by several hundred thousand citizens and medical professionals.<reF>https://gbdeclaration.org/view-signatures/</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Own words== | ||
+ | It called for a number of measures, including "clearly stated objective for the overall response to Covid-19", to "consider the complex trade-offs that occur: (i) within any [[healthcare system]]; and (ii) between healthcare, society and the economy."<ref name=letter/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | "The unstated objective currently appears to be one of suppression of the virus, until such a time that a vaccine can be deployed. This objective is increasingly unfeasible (notwithstanding our more specific concerns regarding existing policies) and is leading to significant harm across all age groups, which likely offsets any benefits.<ref name=letter/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The appeal concluded "In light of the above, our strategy should therefore target interventions to protect those most at risk"<ref name=letter/> , especially the elderly and other "high risk groups". | ||
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
− | [[Wikipedia]] says it was "sponsored by the [[American Institute for Economic Research]], a [[libertarian]] free market think tank associated with climate change denial". | + | [[Wikipedia]] says it was "sponsored by the [[American Institute for Economic Research]], a [[libertarian]] free market think tank associated with [[climate denial|climate change denial]]".<ref>https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/</ref> |
− | Undermined and smeared by the [[CCM]]. | + | Undermined and smeared by the [[CCM]] <ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/health/coronavirus-great-barrington.html</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-den-of-dissent-inside-the-white-house-task-force-as-coronavirus-surges/2020/10/19/7ff8ee6a-0a6e-11eb-859b-f9c27abe638d_story.html</ref><ref>https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-23/coronacheck-craig-kelly-george-christensen-hydroxychloroquine/12802672</ref><ref>https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/espen-nakstad-kritiserer-omstridt-korona-opprop/s/12-95-3424033410</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/11/the-rebel-scientists-cause-would-be-more-persuasive-if-it-werent-so-half-baked</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts-dr-johnny-bananas-covid</ref> (see the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrington_Declaration Wikipedia article]), and parts of the "alternative media"<ref>https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/10/31/wwti-o31.html</ref> |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 11:40, 25 September 2024
Great Barrington declaration (open letter) | |
---|---|
Type | file of unspecified type |
Founded | 4 October 2020 |
Author(s) | • Sunetra Gupta • Carl Heneghan • Karol Sikora • Sam Williams |
Recipient(s) | Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Chris Whitty, Frank Atherton, Gregor Ian Smith, Michael McBride, Patrick Vallance |
Open letter published in October 2020 during the Covid lockdowns, calling for "targeted interventions to protect those most at risk". |
The Great Barrington Declaration is an open letter by 25 "prominent scientists" published in October 2020 to protest against the Covid lockdowns, but before the "vaccines" were rolled out.
Authors and signatories
The declaration was initiated by Professor Sunetra Gupta, Professor of theoretical epidemiology, the University of Oxford; Professor Carl Heneghan; Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, the University of Oxford; Professor Karol Sikora; Consultant oncologist and Professor of medicine, University of Buckingham; and Sam Williams; Director and co-founder of Economic Insight; and originally co-signed by 21 other scientists.[1] The open letter was later signed by several hundred thousand citizens and medical professionals.[2]
Own words
It called for a number of measures, including "clearly stated objective for the overall response to Covid-19", to "consider the complex trade-offs that occur: (i) within any healthcare system; and (ii) between healthcare, society and the economy."[1]
"The unstated objective currently appears to be one of suppression of the virus, until such a time that a vaccine can be deployed. This objective is increasingly unfeasible (notwithstanding our more specific concerns regarding existing policies) and is leading to significant harm across all age groups, which likely offsets any benefits.[1]
The appeal concluded "In light of the above, our strategy should therefore target interventions to protect those most at risk"[1] , especially the elderly and other "high risk groups".
Official narrative
Wikipedia says it was "sponsored by the American Institute for Economic Research, a libertarian free market think tank associated with climate change denial".[3]
Undermined and smeared by the CCM [4][5][6][7][8][9] (see the Wikipedia article), and parts of the "alternative media"[10]
Related Document
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:A targeted and evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 policy response (an open letter) | Open letter | 21 September 2020 | Karol Sikora Sunetra Gupta Carl Heneghan Sam Williams | An open letter to UK PM Boris Johnson from prominent scientists to hinder a new lockdown and change other failed policies |
References
- ↑ a b c d Document:A targeted and evidence-based approach to the COVID-19 policy response (an open letter)
- ↑ https://gbdeclaration.org/view-signatures/
- ↑ https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/health/coronavirus-great-barrington.html
- ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-den-of-dissent-inside-the-white-house-task-force-as-coronavirus-surges/2020/10/19/7ff8ee6a-0a6e-11eb-859b-f9c27abe638d_story.html
- ↑ https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-23/coronacheck-craig-kelly-george-christensen-hydroxychloroquine/12802672
- ↑ https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/espen-nakstad-kritiserer-omstridt-korona-opprop/s/12-95-3424033410
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/11/the-rebel-scientists-cause-would-be-more-persuasive-if-it-werent-so-half-baked
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts-dr-johnny-bananas-covid
- ↑ https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/10/31/wwti-o31.html