Difference between revisions of "9-11/Legal action"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{event |wikipedia= |constitutes=Legal action }} '''The legal position as regards 9/11''' is complex, self-contradictory and not well reported by {{ccm}}. ==9-11/Compensa...")
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Blaming Iran==
 
==Blaming Iran==
[[image:George Daniels.jpg|Manhattan based US District Judge George Daniels has issued various ruling about 9-11|left|thumbnail|333px]]
+
[[image:George Daniels.jpg|Manhattan based US District Judge [[George Daniels]] has issued various ruling about 9-11|left|thumbnail|333px]]
 
[[Stanley Hilton]] attempted to prosecute [[cabal]] members for their involvement, but was told that since they were employed by the US government, they had "[[sovereign immunity]]" from such lawsuits.  
 
[[Stanley Hilton]] attempted to prosecute [[cabal]] members for their involvement, but was told that since they were employed by the US government, they had "[[sovereign immunity]]" from such lawsuits.  
  
Line 23: Line 23:
 
===2018:-"Narrowly articulate a reasonable basis"===
 
===2018:-"Narrowly articulate a reasonable basis"===
 
In March 2018, George Daniels ruled that plaintiffs suing Saudi Arabia had “narrowly articulate a reasonable basis” and could proceed.
 
In March 2018, George Daniels ruled that plaintiffs suing Saudi Arabia had “narrowly articulate a reasonable basis” and could proceed.
 
  
 
==2001 Anthrax attacks==
 
==2001 Anthrax attacks==
{{FA2001 Anthrax attacks}}
+
{{FA|2001 Anthrax attacks}}
 
The FBI's investigation into the [[2001 Anthrax attacks]] was led by [[Richard Lambert]], who in 2015 sued the FBI, alleging that they were concealing evidence that could have exonerated Ivins.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html</ref><ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-fbi-hiding-evidence-anthrax-case-20150415-story.html</ref>
 
The FBI's investigation into the [[2001 Anthrax attacks]] was led by [[Richard Lambert]], who in 2015 sued the FBI, alleging that they were concealing evidence that could have exonerated Ivins.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html</ref><ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-fbi-hiding-evidence-anthrax-case-20150415-story.html</ref>
  
In September 2011, an 8 year legal battle concluded when the US federal government agreed to pay $2.5 million to the family of Robert Stevens, the first anthrax victim. This exposed slack rules and sloppy recordkeeping at the Army’s biodefense laboratory at [[Fort Detrick]].
+
The FBI accused [[Steven Hatfill]] with the attacks. After "a decade of lawsuits" he cleared his name.<ref>http://www.newsweek.com/2014/06/27/steven-hatfills-strange-trip-accused-terrorist-medical-adventurer-255295.html</ref>
 +
 
 +
In September 2011, an 8 year legal battle concluded when the US federal government agreed to pay $2.5 million to the family of Robert Stevens, the first anthrax victim. This exposed slack rules and sloppy recordkeeping at the Army’s biodefense laboratory at [[Fort Detrick]].<ref>https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/421-national-security/8653-us-to-pay-25m-in-photo-editors-anthrax-death</ref>
  
  

Revision as of 08:47, 29 March 2018

Event.png 9-11/Legal action(Legal action) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png

The legal position as regards 9/11 is complex, self-contradictory and not well reported by commercially-controlled media.

9-11/Compensation fund

Full article: 9-11/Compensation fund

97% of victims' family members accepted money from the 9-11/Compensation fund and in so doing agreed not to be involved in legal action about the attacks. Beverly Eckert notably refused and stated that "My silence cannot be bought". She died in February 2009 in a small plane crash. Lawyer Michael H. Doran was working with families who rejected the government's offer when he died in a plane crash on April 28, 2009.

Blaming Iran

Manhattan based US District Judge George Daniels has issued various ruling about 9-11

Stanley Hilton attempted to prosecute cabal members for their involvement, but was told that since they were employed by the US government, they had "sovereign immunity" from such lawsuits.

In 2011, U.S. District Judge George Daniels blamed Iran, the Taliban and al Qaeda for the attacks, and demanded that Iran pay over $10 billion.

Saudi Arabia

US trial judges twice ruled that Saudi Arabia is immune from prosecution under the federal Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, but in 2013, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York revived a lawsuit in light of a 2011 decision that had allowed similar claims to proceed against Afghanistan.

2015:- "Sovereign immunity"

In September 2015, George Daniels ruled further that Saudi Arabia had "sovereign immunity" from prosecution in regard to 9-11.[1]

2018:-"Narrowly articulate a reasonable basis"

In March 2018, George Daniels ruled that plaintiffs suing Saudi Arabia had “narrowly articulate a reasonable basis” and could proceed.

2001 Anthrax attacks

Full article: Rated 4/5 2001 Anthrax attacks

The FBI's investigation into the 2001 Anthrax attacks was led by Richard Lambert, who in 2015 sued the FBI, alleging that they were concealing evidence that could have exonerated Ivins.[2][3]

The FBI accused Steven Hatfill with the attacks. After "a decade of lawsuits" he cleared his name.[4]

In September 2011, an 8 year legal battle concluded when the US federal government agreed to pay $2.5 million to the family of Robert Stevens, the first anthrax victim. This exposed slack rules and sloppy recordkeeping at the Army’s biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick.[5]


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References