Difference between revisions of "Ebola"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org" to "|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org")
(Unstub)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
|type=disease
+
|type=virus, disease
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola_virus_disease
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola_virus_disease
 
}}
 
}}
Ebola is a naturally occurring, often fatal disease. It typically occurs in outbreaks in tropical regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. It was first identified in 26 August 1976. The most recent outbreak was detected in [[Ebola/2014 event|March 2014]].
+
'''Ebola''' is a naturally occurring, often fatal disease. It typically occurs in outbreaks in tropical regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. It was first identified in 26 August 1976. The most recent outbreak was detected in [[Ebola/2014 event|March 2014]].
  
 
==Outbreaks==
 
==Outbreaks==
Line 16: Line 16:
 
==Screening technology==
 
==Screening technology==
 
In 2014, the US military was reportedly using a genetic screening technology for ebola detection that the [[FDA]] was "actively blocking" in the USA.<ref>http://www.naturalnews.com/047315_Ebola_detection_testing_technology_FDA.html</ref>
 
In 2014, the US military was reportedly using a genetic screening technology for ebola detection that the [[FDA]] was "actively blocking" in the USA.<ref>http://www.naturalnews.com/047315_Ebola_detection_testing_technology_FDA.html</ref>
 +
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{Stub}}
 

Revision as of 10:26, 20 April 2018

Concept.png Ebola Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Typevirus,  disease
Interest of• Michael Callahan
• Ron Klain
• Robert Malone
• Jon Rappoport
• Devi Sridhar
• Hans Tolzin
• Don Craig Wiley

Ebola is a naturally occurring, often fatal disease. It typically occurs in outbreaks in tropical regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. It was first identified in 26 August 1976. The most recent outbreak was detected in March 2014.

Outbreaks

The disease has had major outbreaks in 1976, 1995 and 2007. Between 1976 and 2013 it killed a total of 1,716 people.[1]

Transmission

In October 2014, CDC was criticised for lack of clarity after it removed a webpage which suggested that Ebola was transmissable from person through coughing and sneezing.[2]

Intellectual property

In 2010, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was granted patent #CA2741523A1 on a strain of Ebola known as "EboBun", derived from the 2007 outbreak.[3]

Screening technology

In 2014, the US military was reportedly using a genetic screening technology for ebola detection that the FDA was "actively blocking" in the USA.[4]

 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Francis Boyle“I have absolute proof from a Pentagon document that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was doing bio-warfare work for the Pentagon in Sierra Leone, the heart of the outbreak, as early as 1988. Why would they do that? As I suggested to try to circumvent the Biological Weapons Convention to which the US government is a party. So, always bio-warriors do use offensive and defensive bio-warfare work, violating the Biological Weapons Convention. So effectively they try to offshore it into West Africa where Liberia is not a party and Guinea is not a party. Sierra Leone is a party. But in Sierra Leone and Liberia there were disturbances which kept the world from really paying attention of what was going on in these labs.<a href="#cite_note-4">[4]</a>Francis Boyle
Sasha Latypova“The perpetrators desperately, at all cost, need you to to believe that "mutating viruses in a lab" achieves some scary result, that then can be "leaked". That anyone can do it, even a PhD student in their garage. That our enemies are doing it and will "release" a super scary bug any time now, unless the Government is "prepared" by making a stockpile of "predictive vaccines" that can be deployed in DAYS after a new scary virus is detected in China. Or Timbuktu.

It is, however, a narrative. There is no way to "mutate viruses" in a lab in the way they all imply - to artificially make them deadlier and more transmissible at the same time. This is a propaganda fairytale with a very specific goal. You should be very concerned about any person (on "their" side or "ours") who repeats it with a serious face.

Sure, scientists can experiment with soups of DNA/RNA and grow things in petri dishes. They can design mutations on the computer and try to make concoctions of things. Are those "viruses" that can "leak from the lab" and "infect the world"? No. The proof of this is that while there are 1000 biolabs in the US and Western world playing with viruses. no pandemics or epidemics have resulted from these activities.”
Sasha Latypova27 January 2023
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References