Difference between revisions of "Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament"
(slight reword) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==7-7 Bombings== | ==7-7 Bombings== | ||
[[image:MI5-photos-of-77-bombers-007.jpg|550px|left|Why remove details and colour and add noise to a suspect's photo before sending it for "identification"?... and isn't this a question that Parliament's "Intelligence and Security Committee" should be interested in?|thumbnail]] | [[image:MI5-photos-of-77-bombers-007.jpg|550px|left|Why remove details and colour and add noise to a suspect's photo before sending it for "identification"?... and isn't this a question that Parliament's "Intelligence and Security Committee" should be interested in?|thumbnail]] | ||
− | In 2009, the Intelligence and Security Committee held an inquiry into the [[7/7 London Bombings]], and noted that the picture of suspects [[Mohammad Sidique Khan]] and [[Shehzad Tanweer]] shown to [[Mohammed Junaid Babar]] for identification purposes was of "poor quality". In fact, it was a black and white, lower contrast photo with added noise. Moreover, it was so badly cropped as to remove parts of Mohammad Siddique Khan's nose and more than half of Shehzad Tanweer's head and body. The Guardian dryly noted in 2011 that "The committee appears not to have been aware of the original, very clear, colour photograph of both men."<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/feb/21/mi5-cropped-7-7-bombings</ref> If this | + | In 2009, the Intelligence and Security Committee held an inquiry into the [[7/7 London Bombings]], and noted that the picture of suspects [[Mohammad Sidique Khan]] and [[Shehzad Tanweer]] shown to [[Mohammed Junaid Babar]] for identification purposes was of "poor quality". In fact, it was a black and white, lower contrast photo with added noise. Moreover, it was so badly cropped as to remove parts of Mohammad Siddique Khan's nose and more than half of Shehzad Tanweer's head and body. ''[[The Guardian]]'' dryly noted in 2011 that "The committee appears not to have been aware of the original, very clear, colour photograph of both men."<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/feb/21/mi5-cropped-7-7-bombings</ref> If this were in fact the case, this would tend to suggest that the committee is no more than a facade. |
==Report on Privacy and Security, March 2015== | ==Report on Privacy and Security, March 2015== |
Revision as of 05:15, 9 November 2015
Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament | |
---|---|
Formation | 1994 |
Parent organization | British House of Commons, House of Lords |
Type | regulator |
Interests | MI5, MI6, GCHQ, Joint Intelligence Committee |
Membership | • Malcolm Rifkind • Hazel Blears • Robin Butler • Menzies Campbell • Mark Field • George Howarth • Julian Lewis • Michael Ancram • Fiona Mactaggart |
Nominal overseer the UK's main intelligence intelligence agencies such as MI5, MI6, GCHQ, JIC, DIS. Probably completely captured. |
Contents
Official narrative
The Intelligence and Security Committee was established under the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to oversee the three main UK intelligence agencies: MI5, MI6 and GCHQ. It has since expanded its remit to include intelligence related elements of the Cabinet Office including the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC); the Assessments Staff; and the Intelligence, Security and Resilience Group. The committee also takes evidence from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS).[1]
Capture
The ISC is an anomolous statutory committee rather than a normal parliamentary select committee. There was an unsuccessful attempt to bring the committee under the administration of parliament in July 2008.[2] The committee produces an unclassified annual report but its work is invariably conducted in secret. The pedigrees of some of the members of this committee suggest that they are establishment insiders hand appointed because their principal loyalty is to the deep state. The committee may well be 100% compromised.
7-7 Bombings
In 2009, the Intelligence and Security Committee held an inquiry into the 7/7 London Bombings, and noted that the picture of suspects Mohammad Sidique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer shown to Mohammed Junaid Babar for identification purposes was of "poor quality". In fact, it was a black and white, lower contrast photo with added noise. Moreover, it was so badly cropped as to remove parts of Mohammad Siddique Khan's nose and more than half of Shehzad Tanweer's head and body. The Guardian dryly noted in 2011 that "The committee appears not to have been aware of the original, very clear, colour photograph of both men."[3] If this were in fact the case, this would tend to suggest that the committee is no more than a facade.
Report on Privacy and Security, March 2015
A special report was published by the ISC following its inquiry into privacy, security and the legislative framework. The report found that although GCHQ collects and analyses data in bulk, it does not conduct mass surveillance. The report said the legal framework should be simplified to improve transparency and identified past oversight omissions including unregulated databases and use of the Telecommunications Act 1984.[4][5][6]
Membership
The UK Parliament appoints the nine members from both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, after considering nominations from the Prime Minister. The importance of the Chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee is unknown, but it has been chaired by MPs with deep political connections
An Office Holder on Wikispooks
Name | From |
---|---|
Robin Janvrin | 2015 |
Known members
6 of the 9 of the members already have pages here:
Member | Description |
---|---|
Michael Ancram | Likely took over from Norman Lamont as European chair of Le Cercle. |
Mark Field | Spooky British Conservative Party politician |
George Howarth | |
Julian Lewis | British Conservative Party politician. Lewis has attended Le Cercle, and has been Chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee since 2020. |
Fiona Mactaggart | |
Malcolm Rifkind | British Conservative politician with many deep state connections |
References
- ↑ Intelligence and Security Committee, Cabinet Office, accessed 28 February 2010.
- ↑ "Intelligence and Security Committee — Should belong to the House — rejected". The Public Whip. 17 July 2008.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/feb/21/mi5-cropped-7-7-bombings
- ↑ "UK surveillance 'lacks transparency', ISC report says". BBC. 12 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑ "Privacy and Security: A modern and transparent legal framework". Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. 12 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
- ↑
{{URL|example.com|optional display text}}