Difference between revisions of "Weapon of mass destruction"
(clarification, as far as possible) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Official Narrative== | ==Official Narrative== | ||
| − | [[Wikipedia]] states that "a weapon of mass destruction (WMD or WoMD) is a nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical or other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere. | + | [[Wikipedia]] states that "a weapon of mass destruction (WMD or WoMD) is a nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical or other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere". It goes along the lines of the [[DHS]] definition.<ref>https://www.dhs.gov/topic/weapons-mass-destruction</ref> |
| − | ==Problems== | + | ==Problems with the terminology== |
| + | Nuclear, chemical and biological weapons can justifiably be called ''weapons of mass destruction'' and are self-evident so. There appears to be indication that the term is going to be used for weapons of lesser capacity, ie [[explosives]].<ref>https://aneskey.com/terrorism-weapons-of-mass-destruction-and-explosives/ saved at [https://web.archive.org/web/20210313123249/https://aneskey.com/terrorism-weapons-of-mass-destruction-and-explosives/ Archive.org] saved at [https://archive.ph/6d4ZI Archive.is]</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===United States=== | ||
[[US law]] is so broad that a "weapon of mass destruction" may be anything that explodes, leading political scientist and "terrorism"-fear skeptic [[John Mueller]] to comment that "As I understand it, not only is a grenade a weapon of mass destruction, but so is a maliciously-designed child's rocket even if it doesn't have a warhead."<ref>https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2013/07/mission_creep_when_e.html</ref> | [[US law]] is so broad that a "weapon of mass destruction" may be anything that explodes, leading political scientist and "terrorism"-fear skeptic [[John Mueller]] to comment that "As I understand it, not only is a grenade a weapon of mass destruction, but so is a maliciously-designed child's rocket even if it doesn't have a warhead."<ref>https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2013/07/mission_creep_when_e.html</ref> | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 13 March 2021
 "Weapon of mass destruction"  (weapon)    | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | technology, propaganda |
| Interest of | • Wouter Basson • Amy Baker Benjamin • Ian Butterfield • Combating Terrorism Center • Dale E. Klein • Herbert Levine • National Counterproliferation Center • Nuclear Threat Initiative |
The phrase "Weapon of mass destruction" is used to try to promote fear and invoke enemy images. Its duplicity is evident from the contrast between its use by commercially-controlled media and its legal definition (such as that exists).
Contents
Official Narrative
Wikipedia states that "a weapon of mass destruction (WMD or WoMD) is a nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical or other weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans or cause great damage to human-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere". It goes along the lines of the DHS definition.[1]
Problems with the terminology
Nuclear, chemical and biological weapons can justifiably be called weapons of mass destruction and are self-evident so. There appears to be indication that the term is going to be used for weapons of lesser capacity, ie explosives.[2]
United States
US law is so broad that a "weapon of mass destruction" may be anything that explodes, leading political scientist and "terrorism"-fear skeptic John Mueller to comment that "As I understand it, not only is a grenade a weapon of mass destruction, but so is a maliciously-designed child's rocket even if it doesn't have a warhead."[3]
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Biological weapon | A "bioterrorist" could use Biological weapons. Researched in Level 4 Bioweapons labs. |
| Chemical weapon | |
| Drone | Remote controlled flying robots, used for a wide range of purposes by governments or private companies as they're getting banned throughout the world for personal use. |
| Earthquake machine | A weapon of mass destruction which would trigger an earthquake |
| Explosive | |
| Nuclear weapon | Hugely destructive weapons stockpiled during the Cold War |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Disinformation" |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:A Conundrum for Corbyn | article | 12 July 2016 | Conrad Sumer | Trident could be Corbyn's much more collegiate equivalent of Blair’s “Clause 4” moment, instead of facing off and bullying his party, he could bring them all together under the banner of nuclear reduction - and if he gets it right, he will almost certainly be the next Prime Minister. |
| Document:War and Peace - The Lost Principles of Science and Value | article | 17 June 2015 | John McMurtry | A wide-ranging critique of the techniques of globalisation and the way in which apparently otherwise well-meaning western NGOs frame the worlds problems in US war propaganda terms |
| File:A Global Chronology of Incidents of Chemical, Biological, Radioactive and Nuclear Attacks 1950-2005.pdf | report | 7 July 2006 | Hamid Mohtadi Antu Murshid | A summary of Chemical, Biological, Radioactive and Nuclear Attacks, from 1950 - 2005, giving the number of injuries and fatalities, and other information (if known) on the perpetrators and motives. |
| File:Israel and CB Weapons.pdf | review | October 2001 | Avner Cohen |
An official example
| Name |
|---|
| Grenade |
