Difference between revisions of "Corporate media/Islamophobia"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia= |image= |constitutes=islamophobia }} Post 9/11, the '''islamophobia is promulgated by corporate media''' more by what it omits to state than...")
 
m (Text replacement - " -- " to " — ")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
 
|wikipedia=
 
|wikipedia=
|image=
+
|image=Corporate media_islamophobia.png
 +
|image_width=408px
 +
|image_caption=Bob Beckel on [[Fox News]] declaring himself an islamaphobe
 
|constitutes=islamophobia
 
|constitutes=islamophobia
 
}}
 
}}
Post [[9/11]], the '''[[islamophobia]] is promulgated by [[corporate media]]''' more by what it omits to state than by what it reports. For example, the [[Corporate media]] in Western countries was quick to repeat the US government's {{on}} about the [[19 hijackers|19 ''Muslim'' hijackers]] without subjecting it to any critical scrutiny (even to the point of not checking whether these people did in fact die on that day).<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm</ref> In 2016, a UK national newspaper was the first to express doubt about the highly dubious {{on}} of the "[[19 hijackers]]".<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/709000/Was-9-11-an-inside-job-Call-for-TRUTH-over-Building-7-collapse-on-eve-of-15th-anniversary</ref>
+
'''[[Islamophobia]] is promulgated by [[corporate media]]''' since [[9/11]] at least as much by what it omits to state than by what it reports. For example, the [[Corporate media]] in Western countries was quick to repeat the US government's {{on}} about the [[19 hijackers|19 ''Muslim'' hijackers]] without subjecting it to any critical scrutiny (even to the point of not checking whether these people did in fact die on that day).<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm</ref>  
  
Some corporate media have squarely addressed the incorrect equation of Islam with terrorism, such as a ''[[Huffington Post]]'' article from December 20915, entitled "Muslims Are Not Terrorists: A Factual Look at Terrorism and Islam".<ref>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/muslims-are-not-terrorist_b_8718000.html</ref> However, by and large, the corporate media, directed by official government sources,<ref name=ug672/> are very quick to Islam with terrorism, as if to establish a connection between the two. It is very rare that it does this with [[Christianity]], [[Judaism]] or other [[religion]]s. As former [[NSA director]], [[William Odom]] observed:
+
==Trusting government==
 +
By and large, especially since 9/11, corporate media have been very reluctant to seriously question {{on}}s dispensed by [[establishment]] sources,<ref name=ug672>http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/672</ref> are quick to equate Islam with terrorism, as if to establish a connection between the two. It is very rare that it does this with [[Christianity]], [[Judaism]] or other [[religion]]s. As former [[NSA director]], [[William Odom]] observed:
 
{{SMWQ
 
{{SMWQ
 
|subjects=War On Terror, Muslim terrorists, Corporate media/Islamophobia
 
|subjects=War On Terror, Muslim terrorists, Corporate media/Islamophobia
|text=[[Terrorism]] cannot be defeated because it’s not an enemy, it’s a tactic. A war against Al Qaida is sensible and supportable, but a war against a tactic is ludicrous and hurtful... a [[propaganda]] ploy to swindle others into supporting one’s own terrorism ... and encourages prejudices against Muslims everywhere. What if we said “[[Catholic]] [[Christian]] [[IRA]] [[hitmen]]” ?
+
|text=[[Terrorism]] cannot be defeated because it’s not an enemy, it’s a tactic. A war against [[Al Qaida]] is sensible and supportable, but a war against a tactic is ludicrous and hurtful... a [[propaganda]] ploy to swindle others into supporting one’s own terrorism ... and encourages prejudices against Muslims everywhere. What if we said “[[Catholic]] [[Christian]] [[IRA]] [[hitmen]]” ?
 
|authors=William Odom  
 
|authors=William Odom  
 
|date=2006
 
|date=2006
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
===Serious doubt===
 +
In 2016, [[Jon Austin]] of the UK's ''[[Daily Express]]'' was the first UK corporate media to express serious doubt about the highly dubious {{on}} of the "[[19 hijackers]]"<ref>http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/709000/Was-9-11-an-inside-job-Call-for-TRUTH-over-Building-7-collapse-on-eve-of-15th-anniversary</ref> which has so effectively fuelled the islamophobic "[[war on terror]]".
 +
 +
==Tackling the issue==
 +
Different corporate media address different population segments, and some are much more islamophobic than others. The ''[[Huffington Post]]'' has run several articles challenging the facile equation of Islam with terrorism, such as article from December 2015, entitled "Muslims Are Not Terrorists: A Factual Look at Terrorism and Islam".<ref>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/muslims-are-not-terrorist_b_8718000.html</ref> In November 2015 [[Gabriel Arana]] headlined an article for the Huffington Post "''Islamophobic Media Coverage Is Out Of Control. It Needs To Stop''" and wrote that "as journalists, it is our duty to dispel myths and counter misinformation — not perpetuate them."
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 15:29, 14 April 2020

Concept.png Corporate media/Islamophobia
(“islamophobia”)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Corporate media islamophobia.png
Bob Beckel on Fox News declaring himself an islamaphobe

Islamophobia is promulgated by corporate media since 9/11 at least as much by what it omits to state than by what it reports. For example, the Corporate media in Western countries was quick to repeat the US government's official narrative about the 19 Muslim hijackers without subjecting it to any critical scrutiny (even to the point of not checking whether these people did in fact die on that day).[1]

Trusting government

By and large, especially since 9/11, corporate media have been very reluctant to seriously question official narratives dispensed by establishment sources,[2] are quick to equate Islam with terrorism, as if to establish a connection between the two. It is very rare that it does this with Christianity, Judaism or other religions. As former NSA director, William Odom observed:

Terrorism cannot be defeated because it’s not an enemy, it’s a tactic. A war against Al Qaida is sensible and supportable, but a war against a tactic is ludicrous and hurtful... a propaganda ploy to swindle others into supporting one’s own terrorism ... and encourages prejudices against Muslims everywhere. What if we said “Catholic Christian IRA hitmen” ?”
William Odom (2006)  [citation needed]

Serious doubt

In 2016, Jon Austin of the UK's Daily Express was the first UK corporate media to express serious doubt about the highly dubious official narrative of the "19 hijackers"[3] which has so effectively fuelled the islamophobic "war on terror".

Tackling the issue

Different corporate media address different population segments, and some are much more islamophobic than others. The Huffington Post has run several articles challenging the facile equation of Islam with terrorism, such as article from December 2015, entitled "Muslims Are Not Terrorists: A Factual Look at Terrorism and Islam".[4] In November 2015 Gabriel Arana headlined an article for the Huffington Post "Islamophobic Media Coverage Is Out Of Control. It Needs To Stop" and wrote that "as journalists, it is our duty to dispel myths and counter misinformation — not perpetuate them."

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
"Islamophobia"“"terrorism" in the post-9/11 American vernacular has become shorthand for "Islamic terrorism."”Gregory Krieg2 April 2017
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References