Fulvio Grimaldi
 Fulvio Grimaldi      (journalist, activist) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | 12 May, 1934 Florence, Italy |
| Nationality | Italian |
| Interests | • Eritrea • mass migration |
Italian journalist, television host and blogger. | |
Fulvio Grimaldi is an Italian journalist, television host and blogger.
Career
Grimaldi worked as a journalist and war correspondent in his 40-year career for radio (BBC), for various newspapers, and since 1986 at RAI.
In March 1999, in controversy over the war on Yugoslavia, he left state television. During the war, he went to Yugoslavia to protest the bombing by being a human shield to protect the bridges of Belgrade. He moved to the Liberazione, the newspaper of Rifondazione Comunista, a party for which he ran for the Senate in 2001, without being elected. In Liberazione he managed a column called "Mondocane" (a word that will later be the title of his blog) until he was removed from the newspaper in May 2003, a dismissal due to political conflicts, having found himself in dissent (from the left) with the party line regarding some international issues (Iraq, Palestine, Cuba and Yugoslavia).
He then worked on self-produced video documentaries on global crises and wars, dealing with international politics.
His blog Mondocane regularly publishes comments on geopolitical issues, especially in opposition to Western interventions and intelligence services, and in support of socialist governments. He deals extensively with deep politics.
In April 2021 he appeared in a documentary, The Story of Giulio Regeni, dedicated to Regeni's death, in an intervention in which points out that an Italian researcher who died in Egypt in 2014 probably was an agent of the British secret services.
He also participated in cameo as a film actor, in the film Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion from 1970, in which he played the role of Patané, a journalist for the newspaper Paese Sera.
Views
There are three major operations with which the finance-capitalist sphere pursues totalitarian political, military, economic and cultural domination over humanity in the third millennium, the single state of surveillance and control without gaps or cracks. They all originate in the so-called turn of the tide of the 1980s, a response to the insurrectional wave of the previous decade and a harbinger of the offensive unleashed twenty years later, starting with the flattening and passivization of consciences and knowledge with the hi-tech tools from Silicon Valley's apprentice sorcerers.
(1) The spread of drugs for the war on drugs; (2) the spread of terrorism for the war on terrorism; (3) mass migration aimed at a single superstate that pursues the destruction of all statehood through the creation of masses taken from their historical context, homogenized by abandonment, despair, loss of collective soul and name and a destiny of irremediable subordination.
If the strategy of destruction of human rights (understood as freedom, privacy, work, autonomy, social relations) is successful, they will replaced by so-called civil rights (mostly understood as overcoming the biological ones) and the right to wage war and destruction on those who it is alleged to be accused of violating human rights.
In any case, the obviously desired side effects are depopulation, general impoverishment, strengthening of a supranational, to a large exent Anglo-Saxon family-based financial elite. Through the accumulation of wealth, unthinkable in the framework of the old class struggle and with the technological tools of which it maintains a monopoly, a concentration of power unprecedented in the history of life on this planet is ensured.
That this process has been able to advance without encountering major obstacles, at least in the West, is also due to the support, to the point of explicit complicity, of subjects, groups, newspapers that call themselves leftists.This support is partly fully aware, partly unconscious due to the scleroticization of one's vision of class relations and the lack of understanding of the radical changes that have taken place, the lack of thinking induced by the propaganda of the dominant.
Much is revealed to us from how the various parts in the comedy have dealt with the phenomenon of migration, without ever investigating its origin and the colonialist strategy that triggers it and which aims to deprive countries of the stealable resources of the youthful energies that would guarantee their control and development and, at the same time, with social dumping in the arrival countries, lowerering the conditions and demands of the locals, and promoting further transfers of wealth from the bottom up.[1]
