Difference between revisions of "The Lancet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|website=https://www.thelancet.com/ | |website=https://www.thelancet.com/ | ||
|founders=Thomas Wakley | |founders=Thomas Wakley | ||
| + | |description=Top medical journal used to promote the [[COVID-19 Official narrative]]. | ||
|type=journal | |type=journal | ||
|facebook=https://www.facebook.com/TheLancetMedicalJournal | |facebook=https://www.facebook.com/TheLancetMedicalJournal | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
}}'''''The Lancet''''' is a highly reputed medical journal. | }}'''''The Lancet''''' is a highly reputed medical journal. | ||
| − | == | + | ==COVID-19== |
| + | |||
| + | ===''We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin''=== | ||
| + | In March 2020, ''The Lancet'' published a statement by [[Peter Daszak]], co-authored by 26 others<ref>[[Charles Calisher]], [[Dennis Carroll]], [[Rita Colwell]], [[Ronald B. Corley]], [[Christian Drosten]], [[Luis Enjuanes]], [[Jeremy Farrar]], [[Hume Field]], [[Josie Golding]], [[Alexander Gorbalenya]], [[Bart Haagmans]], [[James M. Hughes]], [[William B. Karesh]], [[Gerald T. Keusch]], [[Sai Kit Lam]], [[Juan Lubroth]], [[John S. Mackenzie]], [[Larry Madoff]], [[Jonna Mazet]], [[Peter Palese]], [[Stanley Perlman]], [[Leo Poon]], [[Bernard Roizman]], [[Linda Saif]], [[Kanta Subbarao]] and [[Mike Turner]]</ref> which noted that "The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."<ref>https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext</ref> Although the original author was not mentioned, by November 2020 emails had emerged onto the internet that revealed that Daszak had written it an solicited the 26 co-signers.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ecohealth-alliance-orchestrated-key-scientists-statement-natural-origin-sars-cov-2</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Hydroxychloroquine hit piece=== | ||
In May 2020 ''The Lancet'' published a paper on the dangers of ''[[Hydroxychloroquine]]''. This was later withdrawn.<ref>https://www.globalresearch.ca/leaked-deadly-hcq-world-top-medical-journals-lancet-nejm-exploited-big-pharma/5715859</ref> | In May 2020 ''The Lancet'' published a paper on the dangers of ''[[Hydroxychloroquine]]''. This was later withdrawn.<ref>https://www.globalresearch.ca/leaked-deadly-hcq-world-top-medical-journals-lancet-nejm-exploited-big-pharma/5715859</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 19 November 2020
 The Lancet     | |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Founder(s) | Thomas Wakley |
| Author(s) | Unknown |
| Local copy | Broken Link: [[{{{local}}}]] |
| Top medical journal used to promote the COVID-19 Official narrative. | |
The Lancet is a highly reputed medical journal.
Contents
COVID-19
We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin
In March 2020, The Lancet published a statement by Peter Daszak, co-authored by 26 others[1] which noted that "The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."[2] Although the original author was not mentioned, by November 2020 emails had emerged onto the internet that revealed that Daszak had written it an solicited the 26 co-signers.[3]
Hydroxychloroquine hit piece
In May 2020 The Lancet published a paper on the dangers of Hydroxychloroquine. This was later withdrawn.[4]
Water fluoridation
- Full article: Water/Fluoridation
- Full article: Water/Fluoridation
In 2014, The Lancet published a paper which mentioned that "A meta-analysis of 27 cross-sectional studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water, mainly from China, suggests an average IQ decrement of about seven points in children exposed to raised fluoride concentrations."[5].
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big pharma | “Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” | Richard Horton | 2015 |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ Charles Calisher, Dennis Carroll, Rita Colwell, Ronald B. Corley, Christian Drosten, Luis Enjuanes, Jeremy Farrar, Hume Field, Josie Golding, Alexander Gorbalenya, Bart Haagmans, James M. Hughes, William B. Karesh, Gerald T. Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Juan Lubroth, John S. Mackenzie, Larry Madoff, Jonna Mazet, Peter Palese, Stanley Perlman, Leo Poon, Bernard Roizman, Linda Saif, Kanta Subbarao and Mike Turner
- ↑ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext
- ↑ https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ecohealth-alliance-orchestrated-key-scientists-statement-natural-origin-sars-cov-2
- ↑ https://www.globalresearch.ca/leaked-deadly-hcq-world-top-medical-journals-lancet-nejm-exploited-big-pharma/5715859
- ↑ http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC4418502&blobtype=pdf
