Difference between revisions of "Institute for Statecraft/Cover up"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
===Complete takedown===
 
===Complete takedown===
On 22 January 2019, the Integrity Initiative "temporarily" deleted the entire contents of their website.<ref>https://www.rt.com/news/449451-integrity-initiative-deletes-content/</ref> The Institute for Statecraft followed suit shortly afterwards.
+
On 22 January 2019, the [[Integrity Initiative]] "temporarily" deleted the entire contents of their website.<ref>https://www.rt.com/news/449451-integrity-initiative-deletes-content/</ref> The Institute for Statecraft followed suit shortly afterwards.
  
 
==Corporate media blackout==
 
==Corporate media blackout==

Revision as of 10:05, 18 February 2020

Concept.png Institute for Statecraft/Cover up
(Cover up)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Chris Williamson Institute for Statecraft door slam.jpg

The cover-up of the Institute for Statecraft has proved problematic since its exposure, through the Integrity Initiative leak was so sudden. As a multi-million pound organisation with a multiplicity of staff members and ongoing prior commitments it was not easy to flush down the memory hole.

Initial efforts

After the initial Integrity Initiative leak, Chris Williamson visited the Institute for Statecraft HQ at Temple on the morning of 19 December 2018 with a delegation from The Canary. On learning their intentions, Daniel Lafayeedney reportedly "slammed the door in his face, without saying anything".[1]

Website

Removal of names

Comparison of two snapshots of the Institute for Statecraft website, 22 November 2018 and 10 January 2019 shows that six names were removed from the list of fellows: Jack Agazarian‎‎ (Senior Fellow), William Bortrick‎ (Senior Associate Fellow), Robert Dover‎ (Senior Associate Fellow), Martin Edmonds (Senior Associate Fellow), Ben Nimmo‎ (Senior Fellow), Malik Niazi‎ (Senior Fellow).

Complete takedown

On 22 January 2019, the Integrity Initiative "temporarily" deleted the entire contents of their website.[2] The Institute for Statecraft followed suit shortly afterwards.

Corporate media blackout

Western commercially-controlled media had,for the most part, little to say about the Institute for Statecraft. This may reflect a D-Notice and/or general disinclination to go near a perceived third rail topic. A partial explanation is also provided by the existence of the IfS/II's "clusters", which extended internationally, and included journalists.

Wikipedia

By January 2020, Wikipedia had just 3 sentences about the Integrity Initiative Leak.

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References