PCR method
 PCR method  (Medical method)   | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
| Start | 1983 |
| A standard DNA-amplification method in medical laboratories, but misused to create a false pandemic during the COVID-19 deep event. | |
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method widely used to rapidly make millions to billions of copies (complete copies or partial copies) of a specific DNA sample, allowing scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it (or a part of it) to a large enough amount to study in detail. PCR was invented in 1983 by the American biochemist Kary Mullis at Cetus Corporation. It is fundamental to many of the procedures used in genetic testing and research, including analysis of ancient samples of DNA and identification of infectious agents. Using PCR, copies of very small amounts of DNA sequences are exponentially amplified in a series of cycles of temperature changes. PCR is now a common and often indispensable technique used in medical laboratory research for a broad variety of applications including biomedical research and criminal forensics.
The method, which takes a small sample of DNA and doubles it for each amplification, will after a certain number of doubling create more and more errors.
The PCR test developed by Christian Drosten for SARS that gave an immense amount of false positive results (and for some reason had to be stuck in the back of the nasal passage, near the blood-brain barrier) was one of the core elements in creating the COVID-19 deep event. By increasing the number of amplification cycles the amounts of false positives could be increased or decreased at will. Doubled 25 times it is increased to 33 million; doubled 40 times the starting unit has been made a trillion, making the result scientifically meaningless.
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author |
|---|---|---|
| Theodore Dalrymple | “The British government has managed to spend approximately $50 billion on a system for testing and tracing cases of COVID-19. So far, the average citizen has been tested five times. Yet mysteriously, the British mortality rate is either above, or very similar to, that of countries that have tested and traced much less often. A parliamentary commission reported that there was no evidence that the whole system had had any beneficial effect whatever. This was a very hasty and naive conclusion. It assumed, for example, that the real object of the system was to prevent illness and save lives. But if one puts aside this facile prejudice, one may come to the conclusion that it was an enormous success, for—in now traditional fashion—it shoveled enormous quantities of public money into private pockets, no doubt seriously enriching large numbers of people. If one assumes that the purpose of the expenditure was to create or reward a clientele class, not only does everything become clear, but it changes one’s opinion as to whether or not the whole thing was a success—in its own terms, of course.” | Theodore Dalrymple |
| Anthony Fauci | “Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, and he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine...
Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on with the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way... They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to and a smugly like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people, face out, and lie directly into the camera.” | Anthony Fauci Kary Mullis |
