Difference between revisions of "9-11/Truth movement"
< 9-11
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(image) |
(description) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|image=911_truth.jpg | |image=911_truth.jpg | ||
|image_width=300px | |image_width=300px | ||
| + | |description=A much maligned (and infiltrated) group with various levels of conviction that the US government's {{on}} of 9/11 is a the pack of self-serving lies and should be exposed as such. | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 1 September 2015
 9-11/Truth movement  | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interest of | • Cynthia McKinney • Manfred Petritsch |
| A much maligned (and infiltrated) group with various levels of conviction that the US government's official narrative of 9/11 is a the pack of self-serving lies and should be exposed as such. | |
Contents
Official narrative
Wikipedia reports that "Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement are conspiracy theorists who dispute the mainstream account of the September 11 attacks of 2001..."[1] A predictable bunch of official functionaries have joined the effort to debunk the growing groundswell of support for a new investigation into the events of that day.
Official response
The preferred establishment response has been silence. When this has been so long as to become in itself suspicious, the commercially-controlled media have released various hit pieces.
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| 9/11 CitizensWatch | |
| AE911 Truth | A high profile 9/11 truth group, including over 2300 qualified architects and engineers |
| Lawyers Committee for 911 Inquiry | A organisation of professionals seeking legal accountability for the events of 9-11 and the prosecution of those responsible |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Truthdig | “I have studiously avoided blogging about “The U.S. government planned 9/11” conspiracy theories because, frankly, they strain credulity* (Editor’s note: I originally had written “…frankly, they’re crap; no government could keep a secret like that from leaking.” But as anything is theoretically possible, I decided to soften my statement); it seems unlikely to the extreme that the government could keep a secret like that from leaking.” | Blair Golson | 5 September 2006 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:911 Truth and the MSM | article | 15 February 2010 | Elizabeth Woodworth | A description of the changing response of the corporate media to the events of 9/11 over the 8 years since the event. |
| Document:Left-leaning Despisers of the 9-11 Truth Movement | open letter | 6 July 2010 | David Ray Griffin | |
| Document:Organised 911 Disinformation | article | November 2010 | 'A Staff Writer' | This makes particular reference to the "Citizens Investigation Team" and the video of their evidence <a href="#cite_note-1">[1]</a> |
| Document:The First 9-11 Sceptic | article | 12 September 2001 | David McGowan | Written whilst the events of 11 September 2001 were still unfolding, posted on the author's web site the following morning, qualifying it as probably the first sceptic post to hit the internet. |
| Document:Waging the Battle for Reality | essay | 29 May 2011 | Anthony James Hall | A Propagandist’s Journey in Search of his so-called Conspiracist Underground. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
