Difference between revisions of "9-11/WTC Controlled demolition"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Squibs are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions.
 
Squibs are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions.
  
−
==Evasion by NIST==
+
==Nano-thermite==
 +
In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by a team of researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in the dust from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.<ref>[[File:Nano-Thermite.pdf |Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe]] The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.</ref> Although  [[Wikipedia]] suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been erased from their article on nano-thermite (as usual, see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nano-thermite talk page] to understand more of the censorship process that removed it).
 +
 
 +
===Evasion by NIST===
 
It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions
 
It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions
 
did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, [[NIST]] publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in
 
did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, [[NIST]] publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in
Line 20: Line 23:
 
clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such
 
clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such
 
tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.<ref>Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf></ref> This, despite the fact that [[standard operating procedure]] requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth, brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete."<ref>section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.</ref> Melted concrete and steel ''was'' found at the world trade center site, and extremely high temperatures ''were'' reported.<ref>[http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/The_New_Pearl_Harbor The New Pearl Harbor], a 2013 video compiling [[9-11]] evidence by [[Massimo Mazzuco]]</ref>
 
tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.<ref>Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf></ref> This, despite the fact that [[standard operating procedure]] requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth, brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete."<ref>section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.</ref> Melted concrete and steel ''was'' found at the world trade center site, and extremely high temperatures ''were'' reported.<ref>[http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/The_New_Pearl_Harbor The New Pearl Harbor], a 2013 video compiling [[9-11]] evidence by [[Massimo Mazzuco]]</ref>
−
 
−
==Thermitic material in WTC dust==
 
−
In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by a team of researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in the dust from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.<ref>[[File:Nano-Thermite.pdf |Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe]] The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.</ref> Although  [[Wikipedia]] suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been erased from their article on nano-thermite (as usual, see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nano-thermite talk page] to understand more of the censorship process that removed it).
 
  
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}

Revision as of 14:21, 24 April 2014

Event.png 9-11/WTC Controlled demolition  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
911-wtc-explosion.jpg
Exposed bySteven E. Jones
Interest of9/11 Consensus Panel, AE911 Truth, Zdeněk Bažant, David Chandler, Niels Harrit, Robert Korol, Kevin Ryan, Ted Walte
DescriptionOn September 11th, 3 steel reinforced buildings from the World Trade Center suddenly collapsed at freefall speed into their own footprints, a set of events that English Wikipedia has decided to devote only a single article to. Scientific evidence is censored from their article.

On September 11th, 2001, three buildings from the World Trade Center suddenly collapsed symmetrically into their own footprints, leaving no large pieces of wreckage but instead just a large amount of powdered concrete and small sections of steel. Revealingly, Wikipedia deems this set of three remarkable collapses worthy of only a single article (as of April 2014, around 10,000 words, just longer than their article on Toilet paper orientation).

Bombs

Over 100 witnesses testified to having heard bombs in the world trade center (including those experienced to make such judgements such as firefighters), evidence which was ignored by the 9/11 Commission.

Squibs

Squibs are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions.

Nano-thermite

In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by a team of researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in the dust from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.[1] Although Wikipedia suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been erased from their article on nano-thermite (as usual, see the talk page to understand more of the censorship process that removed it).

Evasion by NIST

It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, NIST publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in the collapse of the World Trade Centers.[2] In fact, NIST never even tested for explosive residue, In response to independent researchers’ questions for clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.[3] This, despite the fact that standard operating procedure requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth, brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete."[4] Melted concrete and steel was found at the world trade center site, and extremely high temperatures were reported.[5]


 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
9-11“immediately after the attacks on the World Trade Center, the entire area in lower Manhattan was sealed off to the public and to the news media. All cameras were prohibited inside the secured perimeter and any “unauthorized” cameras were immediately confiscated.”8 May 2009
9-11/WTC7/Destruction“I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion.”John Kerry
Rudy Giuliani<nowiki>“I went down to the se and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner [[[Bernard Kerik]]], the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center [1 or 2] was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”</nowiki>Rudy Giuliani11 JL

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Dimitri Khalezov Interviewinterview14 October 2010Daniel Estulin
Dimitri Khalezov		Daniel Estulin probes the startling claims of Dimitri Khalezov - an ex-Soviet army nuclear weapons specialist - about the events of 9-11 and the then pending extradition of his colleague Victor Bout from Thailand to the USA on arms trafficking charges
Document:Donald Rumsfeld and the demolition of WTC 7article22 May 2014Kevin RyanFurther evidence of Donald Rumsfeld's complicity in the events of 9/11, with particular reference to his substantial connection to WTC7 and his lying about it and its destruction..
Document:E-mail from Kevin Ryan to Frank Gayleemail11 November 2004Kevin RyanAn Email expressing puzzlement at NIST's unreasonable claims about steel melting from a jet fuel fire, after which the author was dismissed
Document:Kevin Ryan - A personal Decisionarticle17 March 2011Kevin Ryan
File:Demolition access to the WTC towers.pdfessay22 February 2012Kevin Ryan
File:NIST Analyses Brookman.pdfpaper26 March 2010Ronald Brookman
File:Nanothermite Smoking Gun.pdfarticle18 August 2009Michael SchmidtAn introduction to the nano-thermite issue and how the "investigators" chose to ignore this aspect.
File:The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers.pdfPaper12 April 2007Gregory Jenkins
Matt Sullivan		An analysis of the implausibility of the argument that "directed energy weapons" caused the destruction of buildings on 9-11, which is argued by Judy Wood.
File:The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites.pdfpaper2 July 2008Kevin RyanAn examination of NIST's connections to the nano-thermite.
File:The physics of high-rise building collapses.pdfpaper24 August 2016Steven E. Jones
Tony Szamboti
Robert Korol
Ted Walte		On September 11, 2001, the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises. Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred.
File:Traces of Tritium at WTC.pdfarticle7 April 2002T.M. Semkow
R.S. Hafner
P.P Parekh
G.J. Wozniak
D.K. Haines
L. Husain
R.L. Rabun
P.G. Williams		This article was submitted to 23rd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

 

The Official Culprit

NameDescription
"9-11/The 19 Hijackers"A collection of 19 Muslim men blamed for the 9/11 attacks, 15 of whom were given visas to enter USA (in several cases, irregularly) at the orders of Richard Armitage.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References

  1. ↑ File:Nano-Thermite.pdf The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.
  2. ↑ “NIST Video: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Building Fell.” August 2008. NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology. July 2009
  3. ↑ Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf>
  4. ↑ section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.
  5. ↑ The New Pearl Harbor, a 2013 video compiling 9-11 evidence by Massimo Mazzuco


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.


PDF reports available on Wikispooks

Retrieved from "https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=9-11/WTC_Controlled_demolition&oldid=34588"