Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wallenberg Sphere"
(Feedback welcome on new term) |
m (|constitutes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Lacking a good value for |constitutes, the phrase "[[deep state faction]]" sprang to mind. Distinct from a [[deep state milieu]], where deep state operatives of the past, present & future all mix, a faction could be more like a family, in the extended sense. Factions may split or coalesce, like a shallow political parties, they may form alliances to gain power, i.e. a single [[deep state]] may be made up multiple distinct factions. Is this a useful concept, or is it unneeded, or duplication? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC) | Lacking a good value for |constitutes, the phrase "[[deep state faction]]" sprang to mind. Distinct from a [[deep state milieu]], where deep state operatives of the past, present & future all mix, a faction could be more like a family, in the extended sense. Factions may split or coalesce, like a shallow political parties, they may form alliances to gain power, i.e. a single [[deep state]] may be made up multiple distinct factions. Is this a useful concept, or is it unneeded, or duplication? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If I look at social media engagement, infographics are becoming more and more popular and longer and detailed. Power structures keep fragmenting, I keep adding (?) to several willing participants that act as compartmentalized liaisons (that deep state tool you mentioned comes to mind, maybe that is something to re-work when finishing the first two WP-projects(?)). Anyway, I'd vote in favour. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 05:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:44, 5 June 2021
Lacking a good value for |constitutes, the phrase "deep state faction" sprang to mind. Distinct from a deep state milieu, where deep state operatives of the past, present & future all mix, a faction could be more like a family, in the extended sense. Factions may split or coalesce, like a shallow political parties, they may form alliances to gain power, i.e. a single deep state may be made up multiple distinct factions. Is this a useful concept, or is it unneeded, or duplication? -- Robin (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
If I look at social media engagement, infographics are becoming more and more popular and longer and detailed. Power structures keep fragmenting, I keep adding (?) to several willing participants that act as compartmentalized liaisons (that deep state tool you mentioned comes to mind, maybe that is something to re-work when finishing the first two WP-projects(?)). Anyway, I'd vote in favour. --Jun (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
