Difference between revisions of "9-11/WTC Controlled demolition"
< 9-11
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(link to WP Censorship article) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Evidence== | ==Evidence== | ||
[[File:911car.jpeg|320xpx|thumbnail|Scorched cars parked at a lower level garage, inconsistent with just a collapse.]] | [[File:911car.jpeg|320xpx|thumbnail|Scorched cars parked at a lower level garage, inconsistent with just a collapse.]] | ||
| − | |||
[[File:Wtc thermite 2.jpg|320xpx|thumbnail|WTC Molten Metal]] | [[File:Wtc thermite 2.jpg|320xpx|thumbnail|WTC Molten Metal]] | ||
| − | * Nano Thermite: In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by an international team of academically credited researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in several dust samples from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.<ref>[[File:Nano-Thermite.pdf |Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe]] The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.</ref> Although [[Wikipedia]] suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been | + | * Nano Thermite: In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by an international team of academically credited researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in several dust samples from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.<ref>[[File:Nano-Thermite.pdf |Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe]] The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.</ref> Although [[Wikipedia]] suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been [[WikiSpooks:Problems with Wikipedia/Censorship|removed]] from their article on nano-thermite (see the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nano-thermite talk page] to understand this process better). |
| − | * Over 100 witnesses testified to having heard bombs in the world trade center (including those experienced to make such | + | * Over 100 witnesses testified to having heard bombs in the world trade center (including those experienced to make such judgments such as firefighters), evidence which was ignored by the [[9/11 Commission]]. |
* Squibs (see above) are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions. | * Squibs (see above) are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
===Evasion by NIST=== | ===Evasion by NIST=== | ||
| − | It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions | + | It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, [[NIST]] publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in the collapse of the World Trade Centers.<ref>“NIST Video: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Building Fell.” August 2008. NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology. July 2009</ref> In fact, NIST never even tested for explosive residue, In response to independent researchers’ questions for clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.<ref>Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf></ref> NIST did however admit WTC 7's free fall. This, despite the fact that [[standard operating procedure]] requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth (which could not be put out for several months), brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete" and other evidence.<ref>section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.</ref> <ref>[http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/The_New_Pearl_Harbor The New Pearl Harbor], a 2013 video compiling [[9-11]] evidence by [[Massimo Mazzuco]]</ref> |
| − | did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, [[NIST]] publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in | ||
| − | the collapse of the World Trade Centers.<ref>“NIST Video: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Building Fell.” August 2008. NIST: National Institute of | ||
| − | Standards and Technology. July 2009</ref> In fact, NIST never even tested for explosive residue, In response to independent researchers’ questions for | ||
| − | clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such | ||
| − | tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.<ref>Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf></ref> NIST did however admit WTC 7's free fall. This, despite the fact that [[standard operating procedure]] requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth (which could not be put out for several months), brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete" and other evidence.<ref>section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.</ref> <ref>[http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/The_New_Pearl_Harbor The New Pearl Harbor], a 2013 video compiling [[9-11]] evidence by [[Massimo Mazzuco]]</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 26 July 2014
 | |
| Exposed by | Steven E. Jones |
|---|---|
| Interest of | 9/11 Consensus Panel, AE911 Truth, Zdeněk Bažant, David Chandler, Niels Harrit, Robert Korol, Kevin Ryan, Ted Walte |
| Description | On September 11th, 3 steel reinforced buildings from the World Trade Center suddenly collapsed at freefall speed into their own footprints, a set of events to which Wikipedia devotes only a single article, one purged of 'fringe' scientific evidence at odds with the official narrative. |
On September 11th, 2001, three buildings from the World Trade Center suddenly collapsed symmetrically into their own footprints, leaving no large pieces of wreckage and eleven hundred bodies never being identified even by body parts but instead just a large amount of powdered concrete and small sections of steel.
Contents
Official Narrative
Wikipedia provides a quick summary of the official narrative, that the steel reinforced skyscrapers collapsed due to fire and structural damage, an historically unprecedented event. Notably English Wikipedia deems this set of three unprecedented and deadly collapses worthy of only a single article (as of April 2014, around 10,000 words, just longer than their article on Toilet paper orientation).
Evidence
- Nano Thermite: In 2009 a paper was published in a peer reviewed journal by an international team of academically credited researchers providing evidence of such an "exotic accelerant" (i.e. the explosive nano-thermite) in several dust samples from the 2001 attack on the World Trade center.[1] Although Wikipedia suggests that peer reviewed journals are a reliable source, that finding was termed a "fringe theory" and as of April 2014, all links to the 9/11 collapse have been removed from their article on nano-thermite (see the talk page to understand this process better).
- Over 100 witnesses testified to having heard bombs in the world trade center (including those experienced to make such judgments such as firefighters), evidence which was ignored by the 9/11 Commission.
- Squibs (see above) are explosive charges used to cut steel support columns. A waves of small explosions is visible in videos of the world trade center buildings' collapses, proceeding downwards several stories below the main explosions.
- Molten metal: There are numerous photographs and eyewitness testimonies to the presence of molten metal at the WTC, both in the buildings and in the rubble.
- Scorched Vehicles parked at lower level garage plastic, rubber, and glass, were completely burned off by a hot blast.
- Peer reviewed scientific journals recording the existence of extremely high temperatures incapable from office fires or jet fuel fires.
- Carbon Nanotubes: Found in the WTC dust and lungs of first responders, formation requires extremely high temperatures specific metal catalysts, and carbon compounds exactly like those found in nanothermite formulations.
- A distinct “white smoke” present—clearly different from smoke caused by a normal structural fire indicated by eyewitnesses and photographic evidence. The second major product of the thermite reaction is aluminum oxide, which is emitted as a white solid shortly after reaction.
- The elemental composition of the metallic microspheres from the WTC dust matches that of metallic microspheres produced by the thermite reaction.[2]
Evasion by NIST
It has been publicly acknowledged that, in their investigation of the World Trade Center’s destruction, federally-funded laboratories and commissions did not follow the scientific method. In August 2006, NIST publicly released a statement that they found no evidence of the involvement of explosives in the collapse of the World Trade Centers.[3] In fact, NIST never even tested for explosive residue, In response to independent researchers’ questions for clarification of their statement, NIST confessed that the federally-funded investigators did not check for the presence of explosive residue and such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. when asked the question, “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?” The public response was that NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.[4] NIST did however admit WTC 7's free fall. This, despite the fact that standard operating procedure requests that checks be made for "exotic accelerants", indicators of which "include an exceedingly rapid rate of fire growth (which could not be put out for several months), brilliant flares (particularly at the start of the fire), and melted steel or concrete" and other evidence.[5] [6]
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-11 | “immediately after the attacks on the World Trade Center, the entire area in lower Manhattan was sealed off to the public and to the news media. All cameras were prohibited inside the secured perimeter and any “unauthorized” cameras were immediately confiscated.” | 8 May 2009 | |
| 9-11/WTC7/Destruction | “I do know that that wall, I remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger that it had in destroying other things-- that they did it in a controlled fashion.” | John Kerry | |
| Rudy Giuliani | <nowiki>“I went down to the se and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner [[[Bernard Kerik]]], the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center [1 or 2] was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”</nowiki> | Rudy Giuliani | 11 JL |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Dimitri Khalezov Interview | interview | 14 October 2010 | Daniel Estulin Dimitri Khalezov | Daniel Estulin probes the startling claims of Dimitri Khalezov - an ex-Soviet army nuclear weapons specialist - about the events of 9-11 and the then pending extradition of his colleague Victor Bout from Thailand to the USA on arms trafficking charges |
| Document:Donald Rumsfeld and the demolition of WTC 7 | article | 22 May 2014 | Kevin Ryan | Further evidence of Donald Rumsfeld's complicity in the events of 9/11, with particular reference to his substantial connection to WTC7 and his lying about it and its destruction.. |
| Document:E-mail from Kevin Ryan to Frank Gayle | 11 November 2004 | Kevin Ryan | An Email expressing puzzlement at NIST's unreasonable claims about steel melting from a jet fuel fire, after which the author was dismissed | |
| Document:Kevin Ryan - A personal Decision | article | 17 March 2011 | Kevin Ryan | |
| File:Demolition access to the WTC towers.pdf | essay | 22 February 2012 | Kevin Ryan | |
| File:NIST Analyses Brookman.pdf | paper | 26 March 2010 | Ronald Brookman | |
| File:Nanothermite Smoking Gun.pdf | article | 18 August 2009 | Michael Schmidt | An introduction to the nano-thermite issue and how the "investigators" chose to ignore this aspect. |
| File:The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers.pdf | Paper | 12 April 2007 | Gregory Jenkins Matt Sullivan | An analysis of the implausibility of the argument that "directed energy weapons" caused the destruction of buildings on 9-11, which is argued by Judy Wood. |
| File:The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites.pdf | paper | 2 July 2008 | Kevin Ryan | An examination of NIST's connections to the nano-thermite. |
| File:The physics of high-rise building collapses.pdf | paper | 24 August 2016 | Steven E. Jones Tony Szamboti Robert Korol Ted Walte | On September 11, 2001, the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises. Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred. |
| File:Traces of Tritium at WTC.pdf | article | 7 April 2002 | T.M. Semkow R.S. Hafner P.P Parekh G.J. Wozniak D.K. Haines L. Husain R.L. Rabun P.G. Williams | This article was submitted to 23rd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
The Official Culprit
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| "9-11/The 19 Hijackers" | A collection of 19 Muslim men blamed for the 9/11 attacks, 15 of whom were given visas to enter USA (in several cases, irregularly) at the orders of Richard Armitage. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ File:Nano-Thermite.pdf The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2 (2009): 7-31.
- ↑ http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-to-debunk-wtc-thermite/5360964
- ↑ “NIST Video: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Building Fell.” August 2008. NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology. July 2009
- ↑ Fletcher, Catherine S. “NIST Response to Request for Correction.” 27 September 2007. Journal of 9/11 Studies. July 2009 <http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/NISTresponseToRequestForCorrectionGourleyEtal2.pdf>
- ↑ section 19.2.4 on “Exotic Accelerants” of the National Fire Protection Association N.F.P .A. 921.
- ↑ The New Pearl Harbor, a 2013 video compiling 9-11 evidence by Massimo Mazzuco
PDF reports available on Wikispooks
- The NIST Analysis: A Close look at WTC 7 - Ronald H Bookman 26 March 2010
- The Nano-Thermite Smoking Gun - Republic Magazine - Issue 16
- Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermite - Kevin Ryan 2 July 2008
