Difference between revisions of "Save Cox's Walk Footbridge Oaks"
(Crowdfunding) |
m |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Recognising the strength of public opinion against felling the trees, the Council obtained two design proposals from its consultants that would repair the bridge and retain the trees. However, it still concluded that they were too expensive and risky, and is currently persisting with its original plan. But Highways has said that it is open to other proposals, and this is what we have the opportunity to present to them now. | Recognising the strength of public opinion against felling the trees, the Council obtained two design proposals from its consultants that would repair the bridge and retain the trees. However, it still concluded that they were too expensive and risky, and is currently persisting with its original plan. But Highways has said that it is open to other proposals, and this is what we have the opportunity to present to them now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Halting the felling=== | ||
| + | In November 2019, [https://twitter.com/PennieHedge Pennie Hedge tweeted:] | ||
| + | :"Temporary halt on felling the trees!! | ||
| + | :"Tweet from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Hayes_(politician) Helen Hayes MP today:] | ||
| + | :"'Pleased to say that following further discussion and representations from me, @CatherineRose6 & @AndySimmons10 Southwark Council has agreed to halt the decision to fell two oak trees in Sydenham Hill Woods so that further options can be explored & community engagement take place'."<ref>''[https://se23.life/t/coxs-walk-footbridge-oaks-to-be-cut-down-felling-halted/13343 "Cox’s Walk footbridge oaks to be cut down"]''</ref> | ||
===Crowdfunding=== | ===Crowdfunding=== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
===Surveying users=== | ===Surveying users=== | ||
As well as the petition, which showed the strength of local feeling in favour of retaining the trees, we have also conducted a [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A5cU7UayHaAMosX_0g1HCUDBAGQSBdsH/view Survey on how people used Cox’s Walk and the footbridge,] and their preferences for its future (the bridge was shut in January because some non-structural timbers supporting the parapet were rotten). This clearly showed that keeping the trees was of paramount importance to over 90% of respondees. Keeping the historic design of the bridge was also important to many. The design we are now proposing achieves both.<ref>''[https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/saveoaks "On 28th July 2020 we successfully raised £2,665 with 73 supporters in 28 days"]''</ref> | As well as the petition, which showed the strength of local feeling in favour of retaining the trees, we have also conducted a [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A5cU7UayHaAMosX_0g1HCUDBAGQSBdsH/view Survey on how people used Cox’s Walk and the footbridge,] and their preferences for its future (the bridge was shut in January because some non-structural timbers supporting the parapet were rotten). This clearly showed that keeping the trees was of paramount importance to over 90% of respondees. Keeping the historic design of the bridge was also important to many. The design we are now proposing achieves both.<ref>''[https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/saveoaks "On 28th July 2020 we successfully raised £2,665 with 73 supporters in 28 days"]''</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Temporary solution== | ==Temporary solution== | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 19 November 2020
 Save The Footbridge Oaks(protest)     | |
|---|---|
 Campaigning to Save The Footbridge Oaks[1] | |
| Founder(s) | Pennie Hedge |
Save Cox's Walk Footbridge Oaks is a campaign to save two healthy, mature oak trees from being cut down as part of Southwark Council's proposed repairs to the footbridge on Cox's Walk, Sydenham Hill and Dulwich Woods in London. Notices have been posted saying that contractors FM Conway and subcontractors C S G (Ushers) Ltd are to remove the trees in the week commencing Monday 16 November 2020.
A 38 Degrees petition organised by Pennie Hedge, founder of the Save Cox's Walk Footbridge Oaks campaign, has garnered over 4,000 signatories.[2] On 19 November 2020, Pennie Hedge tweeted:
- "Felling Day minus 3. Petition now has 4,087 signatures. @lb_southwark Climate Change Consultation claims to have 'inclusivity, transparency and ambition' as its guiding principles.
- "Why not start now and open a genuine dialogue with us?"[3]
Contents
Background
In January 2019 Southwark Council gave itself planning permission to fell two mature, healthy oak trees growing close to the footbridge on Cox’s Walk. This is a footpath running from Dulwich Common on the South Circular A205 to Sydenham Hill, and leading to Dulwich and Sydenham Hill Woods, a conservation area of ancient woodland. The trees are growing in the Sydenham Hill Wood nature reserve managed by London Wildlife Trust (LWT), whose objections to the planning application were overruled (although 14 young oaks were planted as compensation – 2 of which have already died). The Council argued that essential repairs to the footbridge could not be carried out with the trees in place. The public consultation over the removal of these trees was held for two weeks over Christmas 2018.
Unnecessary price to pay
Campaign founder Pennie Hedge explained:
The loss of these two trees seemed to many of us who love these woods, a high and probably unnecessary price to pay for repairs to the bridge. The trees have a value of over £240,000 as assessed by the Capital Asset Value of Amenity Trees (CAVAT). Their value as wildlife habitats and for carbon sequestration would take many decades for the young trees to replicate. The footbridge was originally built in 1865 to cross the High Level Railway to Crystal Palace, and although repaired and rebuilt many times, retains its main historic features. The railway is long gone and the cutting is now part of the LWT nature reserve. We started a petition, asking the Council to reconsider and to look for alternative repairs that would retain the trees. The petition has over 2,800 signatures.
Recognising the strength of public opinion against felling the trees, the Council obtained two design proposals from its consultants that would repair the bridge and retain the trees. However, it still concluded that they were too expensive and risky, and is currently persisting with its original plan. But Highways has said that it is open to other proposals, and this is what we have the opportunity to present to them now.
Halting the felling
In November 2019, Pennie Hedge tweeted:
- "Temporary halt on felling the trees!!
- "Tweet from Helen Hayes MP today:
- "'Pleased to say that following further discussion and representations from me, @CatherineRose6 & @AndySimmons10 Southwark Council has agreed to halt the decision to fell two oak trees in Sydenham Hill Woods so that further options can be explored & community engagement take place'."[4]
Crowdfunding
The independent engineer volunteered his time to produce the outline proposals for the bridge repair. However, more detailed design work is needed to get the proposal to the stage where we can present it to the Council, and we need to recompense him for the time he would need to do this. We also need a full report from the arboriculturist to present as evidence that retaining the trees would not pose a risk to either the work or the trees themselves.
Surveying users
As well as the petition, which showed the strength of local feeling in favour of retaining the trees, we have also conducted a Survey on how people used Cox’s Walk and the footbridge, and their preferences for its future (the bridge was shut in January because some non-structural timbers supporting the parapet were rotten). This clearly showed that keeping the trees was of paramount importance to over 90% of respondees. Keeping the historic design of the bridge was also important to many. The design we are now proposing achieves both.[5]
Temporary solution
In October 2020, Pennie Hedge posted on Facebook:
We have this week emailed the Council to ask for the rotten timbers on the bridge to be removed immediately, so that the bridge can be reopened. This would be a temporary measure that would allow time for them to work with us for a cost-effective repair that retains the oaks, keeps the bridge and reinstates the timber superstructure.
We had hoped that the Council would engage with us sooner to work our design to construction detail in the most cost-effective way and enable all the repairs to be completed this winter. However, as it is now five weeks since the meeting on 22nd September and we are still awaiting responses to our questions and comments, it is clear that this is not going to happen. Added to that, Councillors have told us that the Southwark Highways network is principally funded by Transport for London, which has well publicised financial problems. Is this the moment to be spending over a quarter of a million pounds on a woodland footbridge?
What we are proposing is a temporary solution that would allow the footbridge to open again and also allow time for the best possible design to be worked out, which could be implemented once the financial situation has improved.
Re-opening the footbridge is obviously important for users, particularly with winter coming on and the paths through the woods becoming extremely muddy – already the case after all this rain! It is also vital for the health of the London Wildlife Trust Sydenham Hill Nature Reserve because of the impact trampling has had since the footbridge was closed, and particularly during the lockdown.[6]
Alternative to felling
On 6 November 2020, Pennie Hedge reported:
The Council intends to go ahead and cut down the trees, week commencing 16th November. We have one more week to Save the Oaks.
Cutting them down is not inevitable. 'Every effort' has not been made. It is Southwark Council's active choice to cut them down. There are alternatives.
If you're a Southwark resident and want to help, please contact your MP and local councillor to ask for the felling to be stopped and the Highways officers to work with us to produce a cost effective, sustainable repair to the footbridge that keeps the trees.[7]
Political tweets
On 16 November 2020, Southwark Lib Dems tweeted:
- Trees have voices...and Residents too!!! @lb_southwark
- @SouthwarkLabour time to remember your No 1 Fairer Future promise? Thank you @SaveOaks[8]
Campaign interview
On 17 November 2020, local resident Susan Haseldine was interviewed sur place by author, blogger and YouTuber Sean James Cameron.[9]
| Save The Footbridge Oaks campaign |
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Peaceful Eco-activism & Lawyers for Nature are Triumphant | Article | 22 December 2021 | Paul Powlesland | "We went from trees potentially being unnecessarily felled to allow work to take place, to those trees being not only saved, but protected into the future. That could only be achieved by a combination of peaceful activism and the assistance of Lawyers for Nature. And now, those trees will hopefully far outlive us all, which is a very satisfying outcome indeed." |
References
- ↑ "Campaigners fight to save Southwark oak trees from the chop"
- ↑ "Save the Cox's Walk Footbridge Oak Trees"
- ↑ "Why not start now and open a genuine dialogue with us?"
- ↑ "Cox’s Walk footbridge oaks to be cut down"
- ↑ "On 28th July 2020 we successfully raised £2,665 with 73 supporters in 28 days"
- ↑ "Temporary measure"
- ↑ "Alternative to felling"
- ↑ "Trees have voices...and Residents too!"
- ↑ "Save The Footbridge Oaks Campaign Interview"
