Difference between revisions of "Bribery"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(lede)
(slightly longer lede)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|description=Influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of [[money]].
 
|description=Influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of [[money]].
 
}}
 
}}
'''Bribery''' is influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of [[money]]. In most jurisdictions it is a [[crime]].
+
'''Bribery''' is influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of [[money]]. In most jurisdictions it is a [[crime]], although often [[selective prosecution]] renders it ''de facto'' legal.
  
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
==Concerns==
 
==Concerns==
Bribery cannot easily be definitively separated from payment for services rendered. Large "speaking fees" are an established norm in some cultures such as the US.
+
Bribery cannot easily be definitively separated from payment for intangible services rendered. Large "speaking fees" for particular individuals have become an established norm in cultures such as the US. In 2013, [[Hillary Clinton]], for example, was paid $675,000 for 3 speeches to [[Goldman Sachs]].<ref>http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-three-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-for-which-she-was-paid-675000/5551567</ref><ref>http://www.salon.com/2016/02/09/hillary_clintons_artful_smear_her_goldman_sachs_speaker_fees_matter_even_if_she_doesnt_understand_why/</ref>
 
 
In 2013, [[Hillary Clinton]] was paid $675,000 for 3 speeches to [[Goldman Sachs]].<ref>http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-three-speeches-to-goldman-sachs-for-which-she-was-paid-675000/5551567</ref><ref>http://www.salon.com/2016/02/09/hillary_clintons_artful_smear_her_goldman_sachs_speaker_fees_matter_even_if_she_doesnt_understand_why/</ref>
 
  
 
==Arms deals==
 
==Arms deals==

Latest revision as of 13:10, 13 September 2024

Concept.png Bribery 
(fraud,  Statecraft)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Bribery.png
Influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of money.

Bribery is influencing people by illicit gifts, very commonly of money. In most jurisdictions it is a crime, although often selective prosecution renders it de facto legal.

Official narrative

Bribery is generally illegal, and distinct from legal payments for good and services rendered.

Concerns

Bribery cannot easily be definitively separated from payment for intangible services rendered. Large "speaking fees" for particular individuals have become an established norm in cultures such as the US. In 2013, Hillary Clinton, for example, was paid $675,000 for 3 speeches to Goldman Sachs.[1][2]

Arms deals

Bribery is a routine part of (almost?) all large international arms deals, such as Al Yamamah.

Drugs deals

In 2019, US billionaire John Kapoor "was found guilty of running a wide-ranging scheme to bribe doctors nationwide by retaining them to act as speakers at sham events at restaurants ostensibly meant to educate clinicians about its fentanyl spray, Subsys."[3]


 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Peter GøtzscheBribery is routine and involves large amounts of money. Almost every type of person who can affect the interests of the industry has been bribed: doctors, hospital administrators, cabinet ministers, health inspectors, customs officers, tax assessors, drug registration officials, factory inspectors, pricing officials and political parties. In Latin America, posts as ministers of health are avidly sought, as these ministers are almost invariably rich with wealth coming from the drug industry. In the beginning of this chapter, I asked the question whether we are seeing a lone bad apple now and then, or whether pretty much the whole basket is rotten. What we are seeing is organised crime in an industry that is completely rotten.”Peter Gøtzsche2013
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References