Difference between revisions of "File:MH17Analysis.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (t)
m (Text replacement - "|sourceURL" to "|source_URL")
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|subjects=Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
 
|subjects=Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
 
|source_name=Vineyard of the Saker
 
|source_name=Vineyard of the Saker
|sourceURL=http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/detailed-expert-analysis-of-mh17-downing.html
+
|source_URL=http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/detailed-expert-analysis-of-mh17-downing.html
 
|comment=Notable for effectively disproving the ''"shoot-down by a rebel-operated Buk SAM"'' claim. It does so by  analysing known and claimed 'Buk' positions, the plane track/speed  and the technical characteristics of the Buk missile system. It demonstrates that Ukrainian army 'Buk' installations were positioned such that they COULD have been responsible but does not address aircraft damage photographs and other evidence indicating that a 'Buk' shootdown is unlikely and that it may have been brought down by an A2A missile, cannon-fire from a fighter plane or a combination of the two.
 
|comment=Notable for effectively disproving the ''"shoot-down by a rebel-operated Buk SAM"'' claim. It does so by  analysing known and claimed 'Buk' positions, the plane track/speed  and the technical characteristics of the Buk missile system. It demonstrates that Ukrainian army 'Buk' installations were positioned such that they COULD have been responsible but does not address aircraft damage photographs and other evidence indicating that a 'Buk' shootdown is unlikely and that it may have been brought down by an A2A missile, cannon-fire from a fighter plane or a combination of the two.
  

Latest revision as of 16:43, 26 September 2014

Persuasive MH17 crash analysis demonstrating that, IF the aircraft was brought down by a 'Buk' SAM, then the missile could NOT have been fired from territory controlled by the DPR militia

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png technical analysis  by Anonymous dated 2014/08/06
Subjects: Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
Source: Vineyard of the Saker (Link)

Authored by 'Vineyard of the Saker' reader 'CDN' where professional expertise is also claimed

Wikispooks Comment

Notable for effectively disproving the "shoot-down by a rebel-operated Buk SAM" claim. It does so by analysing known and claimed 'Buk' positions, the plane track/speed and the technical characteristics of the Buk missile system. It demonstrates that Ukrainian army 'Buk' installations were positioned such that they COULD have been responsible but does not address aircraft damage photographs and other evidence indicating that a 'Buk' shootdown is unlikely and that it may have been brought down by an A2A missile, cannon-fire from a fighter plane or a combination of the two.

There are over 160 comments on the Vineyard of the Saker post accompanying the advice of this analysis, many of them with useful additional information and speculation

★ Start a Discussion about this document



File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current05:42, 21 August 2014 (11.71 MB)Peter (talk | contribs)Analysis of the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 Category:Doc
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.