Difference between revisions of "City of London"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
("Ring of Steel" idea)
m (sponsors full Fact)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|map=The_City_London.svg
 
|map=The_City_London.svg
 
|coordinates=51.5155, -0.0922
 
|coordinates=51.5155, -0.0922
 +
|sponsors=Full Fact
 +
|description=A tiny part of central London not fully subject to the authority of parliament.
 
}}
 
}}
  
The '''City of London''' is a tiny part of [[London]] to which special rules apply. It has its own police force, the [[City of London police]].
+
The '''City of London''' is a tiny part of central [[London]] to which special laws apply. It has its own police force, the [[City of London police]].
  
 
==Jurisdiction==
 
==Jurisdiction==
It is the only jurisdiction in the UK not fully subject to the authority of parliament.<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/08/britain-civilised-mafia-state</ref>
+
It is the only jurisdiction in the UK not fully subject to the authority of parliament.<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/08/britain-civilised-mafia-state</ref> This is occasionally exaggerated to suggest it is "a sovereign city-state, completely separate from London".<ref>https://www.itnj.org/frequently-asked-questions/</ref>  
  
 
==Control technology==
 
==Control technology==
Line 16: Line 18:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
{{Stub}}
 

Latest revision as of 08:31, 10 August 2022

Place.png City of London  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
The City London.svg
Subpage(s)City of London/Police
A tiny part of central London not fully subject to the authority of parliament.

The City of London is a tiny part of central London to which special laws apply. It has its own police force, the City of London police.

Jurisdiction

It is the only jurisdiction in the UK not fully subject to the authority of parliament.[1] This is occasionally exaggerated to suggest it is "a sovereign city-state, completely separate from London".[2]

Control technology

On 24 December 2016, the BBC announced on the advice of MI5 and "counter-terrorism police" that "a "ring of steel" costing £5m had been proposed to protect the skyscrapers in London's "Square Mile" from terrorist attack," including manned checkpoints, rising street bollards and crash-proof barricades. It made reference to the Berlin Christmas market attack.[3]

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Matthew Ehret“[...] The City of London is a very old institution and is has been the center of world finance for hundreds of years. So how were they able to control 400 million Indians, for 200 years, how were they able to do that? When they only had at most maybe 12-13.000 soldiers physically on the ground. That doesn't make sense.

And so it's only when you begin to realize, okay it's a much more multifaceted component, you have intelligence, you have cultural warfare, which is something reserved for the elite, as far as a knowledge of science of cultural warfare. This is not something you learn in community college. This is something which is reserved for a very select batch of young people, who are perhaps of the right family, who have the right inclinations, who are selected, they're discovered, they're provided sometimes, Rode-scholarships as part of their process of reaching upper level management position. And in the course of doing that, a set of experiences is provided to those young people, who go through an Oxford, or another, there's there's a variety of these types of scholarships that are provided, who then are brought into a sense of an understanding of the longer waves of history and how history actually moves, versus how we're taught in popular books you can buy at your local bookstore, which involves controlling the way people are thinking, controlling the way they're feeling,

[the interviewer mentions the Tavistock Institute] That's one aspect. Yeah it's the psychological warfare component of the British Empire. [on the question if it is the main component of that kind of operation]

Yeah it's an artery, there's also other aspects of it too. There is cultural wars that also involve approaches to science. What method will be permitted in the scientific world, so what sorts of theories are going to receive money, financial support, publications in peer-reviewed journals and which approaches to science are going to be crushed, choked of funding. There's things like that. There's also artistic aspects too. What sorts of artistic traditions will be provided money, revenue to grow, and which ones will be choked off. Why are we producing no more Beethovens, or Mozart's, or Schubert's today, why is that?

[interviewer mentions the sub-standard quality of modern music/artists and the propaganda aspects of it]

It's kind of like this question of, terrorism foreign and domestic, is: are these naturally occurring phenomenon, or are they artificially created to induce a certain effect in a target society you want to control, through fear and through other things, confusion. And it's the same sort of thing with abstract art, a-tonalist music, scientific theories that are useless. We discovered the god particle 10 years ago, what changed? Nothing!

[Matthew Ehret continues that with billions of founding of the LHC an observation was made that had no effect on the world that people experience, it only could unite theoretical models that were not compatible before (since gravity was a force that could not fit with the other four fundamental forces)]

Is that a real scientific discovery, if you make a discovery and then nothing changes? No, not at all. A scientific discovery comes [brings] with it, a power of of action, of having an ability to make better discoveries, but also live a better life, to translate those discoveries into new ways of having better technologies, of having more power to move to live a better life [...]”
Matthew Ehret19 June 2022

 

Groups Headquartered Here

GroupStart
City of London School1442 JL
N M Rothschild & Sons

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Rachel Reeves needs to develop some decent ideas very quicklyblog post25 May 2023Richard MurphyRachel Reeves is a person out of time, out of ideas, and right now with no answer to any question that might reasonably be asked of her. It's very depressing.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References