Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rian van Rijbroek"
m (Clarification) |
m (Got blocked by the HTML) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
Created page for a mysterious individual. | Created page for a mysterious individual. | ||
| − | While her potential interesting connections only include the notoriously active Willem Vermeend and an UK/Swedish Security/IT-firm, she was brought in 3 days after the [[AIVD]] | + | While her only potential interesting connections only include the notoriously active Willem Vermeend and an UK/Swedish Security/IT-firm, she was brought in 3 days after the [[AIVD]] |
and [[Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service]] revealed to been the source for the investigation led by [[Robert Mueller]], while reacting to an increasingly bigger Dutch problem of minimal capacity of Dutch servers to withstand merely decent [[Denial-of-service attacks]]. | and [[Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service]] revealed to been the source for the investigation led by [[Robert Mueller]], while reacting to an increasingly bigger Dutch problem of minimal capacity of Dutch servers to withstand merely decent [[Denial-of-service attacks]]. | ||
Revision as of 07:31, 27 July 2018
Created page for a mysterious individual. While her only potential interesting connections only include the notoriously active Willem Vermeend and an UK/Swedish Security/IT-firm, she was brought in 3 days after the AIVD and Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service revealed to been the source for the investigation led by Robert Mueller, while reacting to an increasingly bigger Dutch problem of minimal capacity of Dutch servers to withstand merely decent Denial-of-service attacks.
Few details I left out; 1. Her company received an €300.000 deposition out of the blue with no known projects or promotion (as van Rijbroek doesn't have any contact info whatsoever while she owns a relatively expansive mansion in the Southern Province of Brabant). 2. One Dutch stylist (her only known employee) removed her listed internship from '07 to '11 on LinkedIn, following her TV appearance. 3. While Kaspersky sued her for remarks she didn't make but was reported to, one wonders why nobody else requested some source.
Maybe she's a pawn for Vermeend. Maybe she's crazy or a very bad actor. Maybe a combination. Please let me know if she raises enough eyebrows to be included here.
