Integrity Initiative/Projection

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concept.png Integrity Initiative/Projection
(Projection)Rdf-icon.png
Integrity Initiative Projection.png
Leaked materials from the Integrity Initiative reveal a lot of attention paid to "Russian Propaganda", with little or no serious effort to try to understand the truth or falsehood of what its pronouncements.

The Integrity Initiative appears to be projecting its own Russophobia with copious references to "Russian Propaganda". The group is quick to name anyone who is less than wholehearted in endorsing the truth as spoken by the BBC as a "pro-Russian" news source.

Official narrative

When asked about the Integrity Initiative, the UK government acted as if it had not understood the concerns and repeated the charge that anyone criticising it was somehow under the sway of Russia - so there is no official narrative about the projection exemplified by the Integrity Initiative. The document below left, from leak 4, may provide a revealing insights into the group.

An illustrative example of the projection by the Integrity Initiative.[1]

"Russia's anti-Western Campaign"

A document from the 2nd Integrity Initiative leak is entitled "Domestic Determinants of Russia’s anti-Western Campaign".

Wartime mentality

Full article: Permanent war mentality‎‎

It is essential to understand their ability to lie and to have no remorse for their murderous actions, be it an individual, such as Litvinenko and possibly Skripal, or be it hundreds of their own people or thousands of innocent victims in Ukraine or Syria.
Integrity Initiative [2]
Emphasis in original

“Information war” (informatsionnaya voyna)

There is a clear distinction between the Russian definition: an all-encompassing, and not limited to wartime and the Western one: limited, tactical information operations carried out during hostilities.

Russian approach is much broader than simply sowing lies and denial, for instance maintaining that Russian troops and equipment are not where they plainly are.

Russian state and non-state actors have exploited history, culture, language, nationalism and more to carry out cyber-enhanced disinformation campaigns with much wider objectives.

Russian aims to extract, exfiltrate, manipulate, distort, or insert information, or just isolate a target from sources of information other than Russian ones.”
Integrity Initiative [3]

Russia "in decline"?

“Russsia’s “escalate-to-deescalate” doctrine provides the geo-strategic context within which its New Generation Warfare is operationalised. Putin has prepared his country to fight in any circumstances so that, when the victims and their neighbors hesitate, the Kremlin can intimidate both the victims and potential supporters into submission. For a Moscow whose society and economy is in decline, this strategy can succeed only if it can previously undermine the societies and governmental structures of the countries Putin targets by successfully employing a wide range of instruments of power – political, economic, social, technological; disinformation, malign influence, corruption, cyber, dirty tricks and the like. These methods exploit our weaknesses, divide our populations by exaggerating cultural differences within societies, drive wedges between nations with shared values by exaggerating the risks of collective security and dismissing the costs associated with its failure.”
' [citation needed]
The document does not mention authorship, but may be Chris Donnelly since he introduces both days of the seminar.
Emphasis added

"Putin’s Russia is emerging as a superpower which poses a threat to the West and its values."[citation needed]

Uncritical attitude

Information sources are routinely classified as "pro-Russian", as if support of any Russian narrative implied support for all Russian narratives. This failure to see that news sources may have an integrity to their output which reflects their own, deeply held beliefs -- so being "pro-Russian" on some topics and "anti-Russian" on others -- be a projection of the group's uncritical approach to information and lack of commitment to a truth beyond any official narrative.

The group's documents assume that the UK government's official narrative on the Skripal Affair is the unvarnished truth:

Postimees has published 14 articles after the Skirpal (sic.) attack. Most of them are referring to the facts announced by the UK government or security forces.”
Integrity Initiative [4]

 

An example

Page nameDescription
Document:Notes from colleagues in the Baltic States who are monitoring Russia carefullyA document from the Integrity Initiative Leak which asserts that "A criminal investigation [into the Skripal affair] alone will not throw these essential clues up, and is unlikely to yield sufficient judicial evidence We need to be looking at, and explaining, this attack from a political and military-intelligence perspective. That means educating our audience to understand how Russia sees this world as being at war."


References

  1. Integrity Initiative/Leak/4
  2. Integrity Initiative/Leak
  3. Integrity Initiative/Leak/5 Institute for Statecraft & Center for Naval Analyses Joint Workshop minutes
  4. Integrity Initiative/Leak ii_Network_Skripal_10.09.18_Part1.pdf