Difference between revisions of "Document:Libya: Fine, but why Britain"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(David Cameron seemingly gung ho on toppling the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, while Barack Obama takes a back seat)
 
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|source_URL=http://labourlist.org/2011/03/libya-fine-but-why-britain/
 
|source_URL=http://labourlist.org/2011/03/libya-fine-but-why-britain/
 
|authors=Brian Barder
 
|authors=Brian Barder
|subjects=2011 Attacks on Libya, UN Security Council, David Cameron, Malcolm Rifkind, Muammar Gaddafi, Nicholas Sarkozy, Barack Obama, Libya
+
|subjects=2011 Attacks on Libya, UN Security Council, David Cameron, Malcolm Rifkind, Muammar Gaddafi, Nicholas Sarkozy, Barack Obama, Libya, Shukri Ghanem
 
|description=[[David Cameron]] seemingly gung ho on toppling the Libyan leader, [[Muammar Gaddafi]], while [[Barack Obama]] takes a back seat
 
|description=[[David Cameron]] seemingly gung ho on toppling the Libyan leader, [[Muammar Gaddafi]], while [[Barack Obama]] takes a back seat
 
|image=London_Conference_on_Libya_2011.jpg
 
|image=London_Conference_on_Libya_2011.jpg

Revision as of 15:03, 4 May 2016

London Conference on Libya 2011.jpg
David Cameron seemingly gung ho on toppling the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, while Barack Obama takes a back seat

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png article  by Brian Barder dated 20 March 2011
Subjects: 2011 Attacks on Libya, UN Security Council, David Cameron, Malcolm Rifkind, Muammar Gaddafi, Nicholas Sarkozy, Barack Obama, Libya, Shukri Ghanem
Source: Labour List (Link)


Wikispooks Comment
Photo-call of participants in the March 2011 London Conference on Libya that resolved to support military action against Libya pursuant to 2011 UNSC resolutions 1970 and 1973.

★ Start a Discussion about this document



References