NIST

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 01:44, 20 May 2017 by Robin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Group.png NIST   WebsiteRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
NIST.png
HeadquartersGaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.
LeaderUnder Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director of NIST
SubpageNIST/Director
Now infamous for their attempt to cover-up the truth of the 9-11 controlled demolitions.

September 11th, 2001

In 2002 the National Construction Safety Team Act mandated NIST to conduct an investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2 and the 47-storey 7 World Trade Center. The point man for the "World Trade Center Collapse Investigation" has been named as Stephen Cauffman‎ and the lead investigator WAS Shyam Sunder,[1] covered three aspects, including a technical building and fire safety investigation to study the factors contributing to the probable cause of the collapses of the WTC Towers (WTC 1 and 2) and WTC 7.

NIST blocked release of various videos about 9/11. In response to FOIA requests they later released videos, including video about firefighters discusing explosives in the WTC.[2] They also released video[Why?] in 2010 showing Michael Hess calling from the 8th floor of WTC7.

Compromised cryptography

NIST is responsible for standardising cryptographic algorithms and standardised Dual_EC_DRBG, which already by 2004 was understood by some researchers to have a possible kleptographic backdoor in its design, with the unusual property that it was theoretically impossible for anyone but Dual_EC_DRBG's designers (NSA) to confirm the backdoor's existence. Bruce Schneier concluded shortly after standardization that the "rather obvious" backdoor (along with other deficiencies) would mean that nobody would use Dual_EC_DRBG.[3] The backdoor would allow NSA to decrypt for example SSL/TLS encryption which used Dual_EC_DRBG as a CSPRNG.[4]

Snowden's revelations

In December 2013, a Reuters news article alleged that in 2004, before NIST had standardized Dual_EC_DRBG, NSA paid RSA Security $10 million in a secret deal to use Dual_EC_DRBG as the default in the RSA BSAFE cryptography library, which resulted in RSA Security becoming the most important distributor of the insecure algorithm.[5] RSA denied ever knowingly colluded with the NSA to adopt an algorithm that was known to be flawed, saying "we have never kept [our] relationship [with the NSA] a secret".[6]


 

Employee on Wikispooks

EmployeeJobAppointed
John GrossResearch Structural EngineerJuly 1983

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
File:NIST Analyses Brookman.pdfpaper26 March 2010Ronald Brookman
File:Nanothermite Smoking Gun.pdfarticle18 August 2009Michael SchmidtAn introduction to the nano-thermite issue and how the "investigators" chose to ignore this aspect.
File:The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites.pdfpaper2 July 2008Kevin RyanAn examination of NIST's connections to the nano-thermite.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.

  1. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o
  3. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  4. Matthew Green. "The Many Flaws of Dual_EC_DRBG".Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
  5. {{URL|example.com|optional display text}}
  6. The Security Division of EMC, RSA,. "RSA Response to Media Claims Regarding NSA Relationship". RSA. Retrieved 22 December 2013.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").