Difference between revisions of "Parapolitics"
(import) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Parapolitics''' is used to describe either covert political activity that is hidden from the public or a complete (de facto) political system, typically comprising elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, hidden from the public; political actions of subterfuge, secrecy, and deceit; and is increasingly used in discussions on democracy to describe the behaviour of the [[deep state]] (i.e. coalitions of institutions and corporations who operate above or outside of the elected government). | '''Parapolitics''' is used to describe either covert political activity that is hidden from the public or a complete (de facto) political system, typically comprising elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, hidden from the public; political actions of subterfuge, secrecy, and deceit; and is increasingly used in discussions on democracy to describe the behaviour of the [[deep state]] (i.e. coalitions of institutions and corporations who operate above or outside of the elected government). | ||
| + | ==Peter Dale Scott's usage== | ||
'''[[Peter Dale Scott]] employs the term "parapolitics," in a completely different manner, as a manifestation of "[[Deep Politics]]":''' | '''[[Peter Dale Scott]] employs the term "parapolitics," in a completely different manner, as a manifestation of "[[Deep Politics]]":''' | ||
{{QB|''"...the investigation of '''parapolitics''', which I defined (with the [[CIA]] in mind) as a 'system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.'...I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But '''parapolitics''' as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional... it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture's rational surface. Thus I now refer to '''parapolitics''' as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged."''}} | {{QB|''"...the investigation of '''parapolitics''', which I defined (with the [[CIA]] in mind) as a 'system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.'...I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But '''parapolitics''' as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional... it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture's rational surface. Thus I now refer to '''parapolitics''' as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged."''}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | He defined it follows: | ||
| + | {{QB| | ||
| + | Parapolitics:<i> | ||
| + | #a system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished. | ||
| + | #generally, covert politics, the conduct of public affairs not by rational debate and responsible decision-making but by indirection, collusion, and deceit… | ||
| + | #the political exploitation of irresponsible agencies or parastructures, such as intelligence agencies… Ex. | ||
| + | ##‘The Nixon doctrine, viewed in retrospect, represented the application of parapolitics on a hitherto unprecedented scale.’ | ||
| + | ##‘Democracy and parapolitics, even in foreign affairs, are ultimately incompatible.’ </i><ref>The War Conspiracy, Bobbs Merrill, 1972, p.173, (chapter epigraph)</ref> | ||
| + | }} | ||
==Original Usage== | ==Original Usage== | ||
| − | The term '''parapolitics''' was first used by Professor [[Raghavan Iyer]] of Oxford University in his 1979 work ''Parapolitics: Toward the City of Man.'' It proposes a more all-encompassing conception than that of the traditional politics of stability, power and self-preservation. | + | The term '''parapolitics''' was first used by Professor [[Raghavan Iyer]] of [[Oxford University]] in his 1979 work ''Parapolitics: Toward the City of Man.'' It proposes a more all-encompassing conception than that of the traditional politics of stability, power and self-preservation. |
| − | In | + | In Iyer's conception, parapolitics is best understood as the activity of continually rethinking the foundations as well as the frontiers of political principles, systems and issues. In this sense, the ‘parapolitical’ transcends conventional politics while still being reflected in it. His dialectic of parapolitical engagement calls for establishing critical distance and a clear understanding the potential costs of commitment - mainly in terms of Establishment disapproval. |
{{QB|''"Parapolitics signifies the imaginative application of seminal ideas vitalizing political theory and practice; the elaboration of fundamental principles into paradigms of relationships among persons and between civil means and humane ends; the quest for political understanding and action based upon expanding self-awareness; and the ever-receding perspective of ideals rooted in the ethics, metaphysics and psychology of self-transcendence."''<br/> | {{QB|''"Parapolitics signifies the imaginative application of seminal ideas vitalizing political theory and practice; the elaboration of fundamental principles into paradigms of relationships among persons and between civil means and humane ends; the quest for political understanding and action based upon expanding self-awareness; and the ever-receding perspective of ideals rooted in the ethics, metaphysics and psychology of self-transcendence."''<br/> | ||
Raghavan Iyer<ref>, ''Parapolitics: Toward the City of Man'', Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979, p. 27</ref>}} | Raghavan Iyer<ref>, ''Parapolitics: Toward the City of Man'', Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979, p. 27</ref>}} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 27: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*[http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/'' Lobster - The Journal of Parapolitics''.] | *[http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/'' Lobster - The Journal of Parapolitics''.] | ||
| − | + | {{SMWDocs}} | |
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{Reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Parapolitics]] | [[Category:Parapolitics]] | ||
Revision as of 17:15, 18 March 2019
 Parapolitics  | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Lobster Magazine |
| A system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished. | |
Parapolitics is used to describe either covert political activity that is hidden from the public or a complete (de facto) political system, typically comprising elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, hidden from the public; political actions of subterfuge, secrecy, and deceit; and is increasingly used in discussions on democracy to describe the behaviour of the deep state (i.e. coalitions of institutions and corporations who operate above or outside of the elected government).
Peter Dale Scott's usage
Peter Dale Scott employs the term "parapolitics," in a completely different manner, as a manifestation of "Deep Politics":
"...the investigation of parapolitics, which I defined (with the CIA in mind) as a 'system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.'...I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But parapolitics as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional... it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture's rational surface. Thus I now refer to parapolitics as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged."
He defined it follows:
Parapolitics:
- a system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.
- generally, covert politics, the conduct of public affairs not by rational debate and responsible decision-making but by indirection, collusion, and deceit…
- the political exploitation of irresponsible agencies or parastructures, such as intelligence agencies… Ex.
- ‘The Nixon doctrine, viewed in retrospect, represented the application of parapolitics on a hitherto unprecedented scale.’
- ‘Democracy and parapolitics, even in foreign affairs, are ultimately incompatible.’ [1]
Original Usage
The term parapolitics was first used by Professor Raghavan Iyer of Oxford University in his 1979 work Parapolitics: Toward the City of Man. It proposes a more all-encompassing conception than that of the traditional politics of stability, power and self-preservation.
In Iyer's conception, parapolitics is best understood as the activity of continually rethinking the foundations as well as the frontiers of political principles, systems and issues. In this sense, the ‘parapolitical’ transcends conventional politics while still being reflected in it. His dialectic of parapolitical engagement calls for establishing critical distance and a clear understanding the potential costs of commitment - mainly in terms of Establishment disapproval.
"Parapolitics signifies the imaginative application of seminal ideas vitalizing political theory and practice; the elaboration of fundamental principles into paradigms of relationships among persons and between civil means and humane ends; the quest for political understanding and action based upon expanding self-awareness; and the ever-receding perspective of ideals rooted in the ethics, metaphysics and psychology of self-transcendence."
Raghavan Iyer[2]
External links
