Difference between revisions of "Holocaust Denier"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(enemy image) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Concept | {{Concept | ||
|description = A demonising epithet applied by the Establishment to anyone who publicly qestions any of the [[The_Holocaust#The three fundamental tennets|three fundamental tenets of 'The Holocaust']] | |description = A demonising epithet applied by the Establishment to anyone who publicly qestions any of the [[The_Holocaust#The three fundamental tennets|three fundamental tenets of 'The Holocaust']] | ||
| − | |glossary = A demonising | + | |glossary = A "Holocaust Denier" is a demonising label applied by {{TE}} to anyone who publicly ''questions'' any of the [[The Holocaust#The three fundamental tennets|three fundamental tenets of 'The Holocaust']] |
|image = holocaust denier.jpg | |image = holocaust denier.jpg | ||
|type = enemy image | |type = enemy image | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|wikipedia_protection = 1 | |wikipedia_protection = 1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | A '''"Holocaust Denier"''', contrary to what one might infer is ''not'' someone who denies that [[The Holocaust]] took place, but someone who ''questions'' whether it took place as described by the {{on}}.<ref></ref> | ||
Mainstream use of the term is similar to those of '[[Antisemite]]', '[[Nazi]]' or '[[Climate-change denier]]', among many others of the type. It is essentially a rhetorical [[ad-hominem]] device to close down debate by demoising its target as somehow 'beyond-the-pale' and thus avoid dealing with substantive issues. Its use on Wikipedia pages dealing with people who publicly question any of [[The Holocaust#The three fundamental tennets|the 3 main tenets of 'The Holocaust']] is ubiquitous. | Mainstream use of the term is similar to those of '[[Antisemite]]', '[[Nazi]]' or '[[Climate-change denier]]', among many others of the type. It is essentially a rhetorical [[ad-hominem]] device to close down debate by demoising its target as somehow 'beyond-the-pale' and thus avoid dealing with substantive issues. Its use on Wikipedia pages dealing with people who publicly question any of [[The Holocaust#The three fundamental tennets|the 3 main tenets of 'The Holocaust']] is ubiquitous. | ||
[[image:Holo re-education.jpg|230px]] | [[image:Holo re-education.jpg|230px]] | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 24 January 2018
 "Holocaust Denier"     | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | enemy image |
| Start | 1970 |
| A demonising epithet applied by the Establishment to anyone who publicly qestions any of the three fundamental tenets of 'The Holocaust' | |
A "Holocaust Denier", contrary to what one might infer is not someone who denies that The Holocaust took place, but someone who questions whether it took place as described by the official narrative.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag;
refs with no name must have content
Mainstream use of the term is similar to those of 'Antisemite', 'Nazi' or 'Climate-change denier', among many others of the type. It is essentially a rhetorical ad-hominem device to close down debate by demoising its target as somehow 'beyond-the-pale' and thus avoid dealing with substantive issues. Its use on Wikipedia pages dealing with people who publicly question any of the 3 main tenets of 'The Holocaust' is ubiquitous.
An example
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| File:The Luftl Report.pdf | An Austrian Engineer's Report on the 'Gas Chambers' of Auschwitz and Mauthausen. It concludes that the Official Narrative claims are technically impossible. |
Official examples
| Name |
|---|
| Robert Faurisson |
| Walter Lüftl |
| Mike Sivier |
| Wilhelm Stäglich |
| Ernst Zündel |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
