Difference between revisions of "Eastern Europe"
(Created page with "{{place |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Europe |image= |image_caption= |constitutes=region |location=Europe }} {{SMWDocs}} ==References== {{reflist}} {{Stub}}") |
(Some history from the 1989 Bilderberg report) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|location=Europe | |location=Europe | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==WW II== | ||
| + | After [[World War II]], large parts of Eastern Europe was occupied by the [[Red Army]] and were apportioned under the control of the [[USSR]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Yugoslavia== | ||
| + | {{FA|Yugoslavia}} | ||
| + | [[Yugoslavia]] was ''not'' occupied by the Red Army and followed a relatively independent path. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==1989== | ||
| + | The report of the [[1989 Bilderberg]] records that {{SMWQ | ||
| + | |format=inline | ||
| + | |text=The great risk is that of explosion. Prediction is notoriously difficult, and in Eastern Europe more than anywhere. But on a sober assessment one can see a serious possibility of some kind of an explosion of popular discontent in four out of the six [[East European]] states over the next few years: [[Romania]], [[Poland]], [[Hungary]] and [[Czechoslovakia]]. (Some analysts would add the [[GDR]]). No one can predict what course such an explosion would take, nor how the [[Soviet Union]] would react to it. A direct military intervention could spell the end of '[[perestroika]]' not just in the country concerned but in the Soviet Union itself. | ||
| + | |subjects=USSR, perestroika, cold war | ||
| + | |date=1989 | ||
| + | |source_name=1989 Bilderberg | ||
| + | |source_URL=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf | ||
| + | |source_details=Conference report p.23 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The report of the [[1989 Bilderberg]] predicted, incorrectly, that {{SMWQ | ||
| + | |format=inline | ||
| + | |text=The political stability of Eastern Europe will continue into the [[1990s|nineties]]. | ||
| + | |subjects=1990s, Eastern Europe | ||
| + | |date=1989 | ||
| + | |source_name=File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf | ||
| + | |source_URL=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf | ||
| + | |source_details=Conference report p.23 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 4 May 2021
 Eastern Europe(Region)    | |
|---|---|
WW II
After World War II, large parts of Eastern Europe was occupied by the Red Army and were apportioned under the control of the USSR.
Yugoslavia
- Full article: Yugoslavia
- Full article: Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia was not occupied by the Red Army and followed a relatively independent path.
1989
The report of the 1989 Bilderberg records that “The great risk is that of explosion. Prediction is notoriously difficult, and in Eastern Europe more than anywhere. But on a sober assessment one can see a serious possibility of some kind of an explosion of popular discontent in four out of the six East European states over the next few years: Romania, Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia. (Some analysts would add the GDR). No one can predict what course such an explosion would take, nor how the Soviet Union would react to it. A direct military intervention could spell the end of 'perestroika' not just in the country concerned but in the Soviet Union itself.” [1]
The report of the 1989 Bilderberg predicted, incorrectly, that “The political stability of Eastern Europe will continue into the nineties.” [2]
Related Quotations
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | “The political stability of Eastern Europe will continue into the nineties.” | 1989 | |
| Stef Blok | “I don't think you'll ever be able to centrally organize the EU countries accepting refugees in equal amounts. Eastern-Europeans would never agree to that. Even if we would force them, hands on their back and they'd say "yes", even then, walk a week through Warsaw or Prague. There are no colored people there. They would be gone within a week. They would be literally beaten up. They don't have a life there.” | Stef Blok | 2018 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Chris Donnelly proposal to FCO | document | 24 May 2018 | Chris Donnelly | The local partner then needs to do or commission an assessment of the agents or promoters of corruption and influence, eg key businessmen or politicians, as well as opposition politicians and clean businessmen, journalists etc who can be allies. These we bring out on trips to London, HQ NATO etc. |
| Document:Would-be German chancellor Scholz jumps the gun on EU expansion eastward, which may provoke more states to follow the UK and exit | Article | 15 August 2021 | Paul Nuttall | Olaf Scholz is a possible candidate for Chancellor of Germany at the September 2021 German parliamentary election. He has warned Russia to expect further European integration and expansion into Eastern Europe. Will this encourage more countries to follow the UK and leave the European Union? |
References
- ↑ https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf 1989 Bilderberg Conference report p.23, 1989
- ↑ https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1989.pdf Conference report p.23, 1989
